Literature DB >> 17002955

Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt.

Joshua A Solomon1, Michael J Morgan.   

Abstract

The human visual system exaggerates the difference between the tilts of adjacent lines or grating patches. In addition to this tilt illusion, we found that oblique flanks reduced acuity for small changes of tilt in the centre of the visual field. However, no flanks--regardless of their tilts--decreased sensitivity to contrast. Thus, the foveal tilt illusion should not be attributed to orientation-selective lateral inhibition. Nor is it similar to conventional crowding, which typically does not impair letter recognition in the fovea. Our observers behaved as though the reference orientation (horizontal) had a small tilt in the direction of the flanks. We suggest that the extent of this re-calibration varies randomly over trials, and we demonstrate that this stochastic re-calibration can explain flank-induced acuity loss in the fovea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17002955      PMCID: PMC1635463          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  40 in total

1.  Transducer model produces facilitation from opposite-sign flanks.

Authors:  J A Solomon; A B Watson; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Decision processes in perception.

Authors:  J SWETS; W P TANNER; T G BIRDSALL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions.

Authors:  M J Morgan; G J Hole; A Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination.

Authors:  R J Snowden; S T Hammett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination.

Authors:  S F Bowne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery.

Authors:  R J Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments.

Authors:  U Polat; D Sagi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions.

Authors:  U Polat; D Sagi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02
View more
  18 in total

1.  Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrast.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Ariella V Popple
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xianghui Chen; Min Gao; Qiong Yang; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Lawful relation between perceptual bias and discriminability.

Authors:  Xue-Xin Wei; Alan A Stocker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Katharine A Tillman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Characterizing perceptual performance at multiple discrimination precisions in external noise.

Authors:  Seong-Taek Jeon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Odelia Schwartz; Terrence J Sejnowski; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Variability in visual cortex size reflects tradeoff between local orientation sensitivity and global orientation modulation.

Authors:  Chen Song; Dietrich S Schwarzkopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The relationship between search efficiency and crowding.

Authors:  Carolina Gheri; Michael J Morgan; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Moderate Alcohol Intake Changes Visual Perception by Enhancing V1 Inhibitory Surround Interactions.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Zhengchun Wang; Yifeng Zhou; Tzvetomir Tzvetanov
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.