Literature DB >> 22529393

Dynamics of unconscious contextual effects in orientation processing.

Isabelle Mareschal1, Colin W G Clifford.   

Abstract

Contextual effects abound in the real world; how we perceive an object depends on what surrounds it. A classic example of this is the tilt illusion (TI) whereby the presence of a surround shifts the perceived orientation of a target. Surprisingly, the magnitude and direction of this shift depend on the orientation difference between the target and surround: when their orientations are similar, the perceived difference is amplified and the target appears repelled in orientation from the surround (i.e., the TI). However, when their orientations are close to perpendicular, the difference is decreased and the target appears attracted in orientation toward the surround (i.e., the indirect TI). These misperceptions of orientation have revealed much about the underlying detectors involved in visual processing and how they interact with each other. What remains at stake are the levels of processing involved. To examine this, we designed a reverse-correlation technique whereby observers are blind to the orientation of the surround. We find that the TI and indirect TI occur reliably and over a similar time course, supporting the role of a single mechanism underlying orientation biases that operates in the early stages of visual processing before the conscious extraction of the surround orientation.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22529393      PMCID: PMC3358900          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200952109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks.

Authors:  J A Solomon; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours.

Authors:  J M Gold; R F Murray; P J Bennett; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation.

Authors:  P Neri; A J Parker; C Blakemore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception.

Authors:  M K Kapadia; G Westheimer; C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Contextual influences on orientation discrimination: binding local and global cues.

Authors:  I Mareschal; M P Sceniak; R M Shapley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Classification image analysis: estimation and statistical inference for two-alternative forced-choice experiments.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  James R Cavanaugh; Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision.

Authors:  C W Clifford; P Wenderoth; B Spehar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-24       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  9 in total

1.  Segmentation decreases the magnitude of the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Cheng Qiu; Daniel Kersten; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xianghui Chen; Min Gao; Qiong Yang; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Interaction Between Conscious and Unconscious Information-Processing of Faces and Words.

Authors:  Shiwen Ren; Hanyu Shao; Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Unconscious local motion alters global image speed.

Authors:  Sieu K Khuu; Charles Y L Chung; Stephanie Lord; Joel Pearson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  B or 13? Unconscious Top-Down Contextual Effects at the Categorical but Not the Lexical Level.

Authors:  Dan Biderman; Yarden Shir; Liad Mudrik
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-05-08

6.  Decoupling sensory from decisional choice biases in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Daniel Linares; David Aguilar-Lleyda; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Small-angle attraction in the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Ayse Akgöz; Elena Gheorghiu; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Visual Contextual Effects of Orientation, Contrast, Flicker, and Luminance: All Are Affected by Normal Aging.

Authors:  Bao N Nguyen; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Spatial limitations in averaging social cues.

Authors:  Joseph Florey; Colin W G Clifford; Steven Dakin; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.