Literature DB >> 25887786

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre.

Morgan Pokorny1, Giacomo Novara2, Nicolas Geurts1, Zach Dovey3, Ruben De Groote1, Achilles Ploumidis4, Peter Schatteman1, Geert de Naeyer1, Alexandre Mottrie5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to large benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).
OBJECTIVE: To present the perioperative and short-term functional outcomes of RASP in a large series of patients with LUTS due to BPE treated in a high-volume referral center. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively collected data for 67 consecutive patients who underwent RASP from October 2008 to August 2014. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: RASP was performed using a Da Vinci S or Si system with a transvesical approach. MEASUREMENTS: Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Continuous variables are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Comparison of preoperative and postoperative outcomes was assessed by Wilcoxon test. A two-sided value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median preoperative prostate volume was 129ml (IQR 104-180). For the 45 patients who did not have an indwelling catheter, the median preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 25 (20.5-28), the median maximum flow rate (Qmax) was 7ml/s (IQR 5-11), and the median post-void residual volume (PVRV) was 73ml (IQR 40-116). The median operative time was 97min (IQR 80-127) and the median estimated blood loss was 200ml (IQR 115-360). The postoperative complication rate was 30%, including three cases (4.5%) with grade 3b complications (major bleeding requiring cystoscopy and coagulation). The median catheterization time was 3 d (IQR 2-4) and the median length of stay was 4 d (IQR 3-5). The median follow-up was 6 mo (IQR 2-12). At follow-up, the median IPSS was 3 (IQR 0-8), the median Qmax was 23ml/s (IQR 16-35), and the median PVRV was 0ml (IQR 0-36) (all p<0.001 vs baseline values). The retrospective design is the major study limitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate good perioperative outcomes, an acceptable risk profile, and excellent improvements in patient symptoms and flow scores at short-term follow-up following RASP. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We analyzed the perioperative and functional outcomes of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy in the treatment of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to large prostatic adenoma. The procedure was associated with a relatively low risk of complications and excellent functional outcomes, including considerable improvements in symptoms and flow performance. We can conclude that the procedure is a valuable option in the treatment of such patients. However, comparative studies evaluating the efficacy of the procedure in comparison with endoscopic treatment of large prostatic adenomas are needed.
Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Robotic; Simple prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25887786     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

Review 1.  The Complex Relationship Between Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Sexual Health.

Authors:  Hanson Zhao; Howard H Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  From open simple to robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for large benign prostate hyperplasia: the time has come.

Authors:  H John; Ch Wagner; Ch Padevit; J H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Long-term results after robot-assisted adenoma enucleation].

Authors:  A Häcker; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Expanding on an Established Operative Approach.

Authors:  Ross Cockrell; David I Lee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Advances in Assistive Electronic Device Solutions for Urology.

Authors:  Kieran Holmes-Martin; Minghui Zhu; Shujun Xiao; Faezeh Arab Hassani
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.523

6.  Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Woo Jung Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-09-16

Review 7.  Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ankur A Shah; Jeffrey C Gahan; Igor Sorokin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy in the era of laser enucleation for high-volume prostates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Josselin Abi Chebel; Julien Sarkis; Elie El Helou; Elie Hanna; Georges Abi Tayeh; Albert Semaan
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-08-11

9.  Mid-term functional outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Alessio Paladini; Daniel Benamran; Ugo Pinar; Igor Duquesne; Davy Benarroche; Jerome Parra; Christophe Vaessen; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Thomas Seisen; Morgan Roupret
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-02

10.  Partial Prostatectomy for Anterior Cancer: Short-term Oncologic and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Arnauld Villers; Philippe Puech; Vincent Flamand; Georges-Pascal Haber; Mihir M Desai; Sebastien Crouzet; Xavier Leroy; Sameer Chopra; Laurent Lemaitre; Adil Ouzzane; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.