Literature DB >> 35107710

Mid-term functional outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a single centre experience.

Alessio Paladini1,2, Daniel Benamran3, Ugo Pinar1, Igor Duquesne4, Davy Benarroche1, Jerome Parra1, Christophe Vaessen1, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler1, Thomas Seisen1, Morgan Roupret5.   

Abstract

For large prostate volume, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) or holmium laser enucleation are the gold standard surgical treatment medical therapy failure. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has recently been proposed as an alternative to OSP and endoscopic techniques. Our objective was to describe our extraperitoneal RASP technique for patients with benign prostate obstruction (BPO), and to report on perioperative and mid-term functional outcomes. Data were collected prospectively for all consecutive patients who underwent RASP in our high-volume tertiary hospital over a 6-year period. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and uroflow findings were compared before and after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were also assessed. Forty-seven patients were included in the study. There was no intraoperative incident and no blood transfusion was needed after surgery. Median time to bladder catheter removal was 4 days and patients were discharged the day after. Within 90 postoperative days, 6 patients (12%) experienced at least one complication, all low-grade except one (2.1%) which was Clavien IIIa grade. By univariate analysis, the only risk factor for postoperative complications was the Charlson comorbidity index (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = [1.1-4.7], p = 0.04). At 12 months, a significant improvement IPSS and uroflow rate was observed. No patient reported stress urinary incontinence. Extraperitoneal RASP appears to be a safe and effective technique for men with LUTS related to large BPO. RASP is less invasive than OSP and wide diffusion of the robot-system could lead to the rapid implementation of RASP as a treatment for large prostate.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Functional urology; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Robot-assisted laparoscopy; Surgical treatment

Year:  2022        PMID: 35107710     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01360-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  19 in total

1.  Direct Comparison of GreenLight Laser XPS Photoselective Prostate Vaporization and GreenLight Laser En Bloc Enucleation of the Prostate in Enlarged Glands Greater than 80 ml: a Study of 120 Patients.

Authors:  Vincent Misrai; Sebastien Kerever; Veronique Phe; Kevin C Zorn; Benoit Peyronnet; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with 360° circumferential reconstruction: step-by-step technique.

Authors:  Giovanni Cacciamani; Luis Medina; Akbar Ashrafi; Hannah Landsberger; Matthew Winter; Peter Mekhail; Mihir Desai; Monish Aron; Andre Berger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre.

Authors:  Morgan Pokorny; Giacomo Novara; Nicolas Geurts; Zach Dovey; Ruben De Groote; Achilles Ploumidis; Peter Schatteman; Geert de Naeyer; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Drug adherence and clinical outcomes for patients under pharmacological therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Luisella Pirozzi; Caterina Fanizza; Marilena Romero; Andrea Tubaro; Riccardo Autorino; Cosimo De Nunzio; Luigi Schips
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Rationale for Robotic-assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Obstruction.

Authors:  Dielle Meyer; Samuel Weprin; Eduardo B Zukovski; Francesco Porpiglia; Lance J Hampton; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-07-20

6.  Robotic simple prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rene Sotelo; Rafael Clavijo; Oswaldo Carmona; Alejandro Garcia; Eduardo Banda; Marcelo Miranda; Randy Fagin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Robotic Assisted Simple Prostatectomy versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Large Volume Prostate: A Comparative Analysis from a High Volume Center.

Authors:  Paolo Umari; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Morgan Pokorny; Ruben De Groote; Nicolas Geurts; Marijn Goossens; Peter Schatterman; Geert De Naeyer; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Intraoperative Adverse Incident Classification (EAUiaiC) by the European Association of Urology ad hoc Complications Guidelines Panel.

Authors:  Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jakub Pecanka; Morgan Rouprêt; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen; Dionysios Mitropoulos
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Impact of surgical wait times during summer months on the oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: 10 years' experience from a large Canadian academic center.

Authors:  Ahmed S Zakaria; Félix Couture; David-Dan Nguyen; Côme Tholomier; Hanna Shahine; Franziska Stolzenbach; Malek Meskawi; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Outcomes and general health-related quality of life among patients medically treated in general daily practice for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Richard-Olivier Fourcade; François Lacoin; Morgan Rouprêt; Alain Slama; Camille Le Fur; Emilie Michel; Axel Sitbon; François-Emery Cotté
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.