BACKGROUND: Valid methods of diet assessment are important for nutrition research and practice, but can be difficult with children. OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 version of the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall for Children (ASA24-Kids-2012), a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall (24hDR) instrument, among children aged 9 to 11 years, in two sites. DESIGN: Quasiexperimental. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: In one site, trained staff members observed and recorded foods and drinks consumed by children (n=38) during school lunch. The next day, the observed children completed both ASA24-Kids-2012 and an interviewer-administered 24hDR in a randomized order. Procedures in a second site (n=31) were similar, except observations occurred during dinner in a community location. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Foods were classified as matches (reported and consumed), intrusions (reported, but not consumed), or omissions (not reported, but consumed) for each participant. Rates of matches, intrusions, and omissions were calculated. Rates were compared between each recall method using repeated measures analysis of covariance. For matched foods, the authors determined correlation coefficients between observed and reported serving sizes. RESULTS: Match, intrusion, and omission rates between ASA24-Kids-2012 and observed intakes in Site 1 were 37%, 27%, and 35%, respectively. Comparable rates for interviewer-administered 24hDRs were 57%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. In Site 2, match, intrusion, and omission rates between ASA24-Kids-2012 and observed intakes were 53%, 12%, and 36%, respectively, vs 76% matches, 9% intrusions, and 15% omissions for interviewer-administered 24hDRs. The relationship strength between reported and observed serving sizes for matched foods was 0.18 in Site 1 and 0.09 in Site 2 for ASA24-Kids-2012, and 0.46 in Site 1 and 0.11 in Site 2 for interviewer-administered 24hDRs. CONCLUSIONS: ASA24-Kids-2012 was less accurate than interviewer-administered 24hDRs when compared with observed intakes, but both performed poorly. Additional research should assess the age at which children can complete recalls without the help of a parent or guardian, as well as elucidate under which circumstances recalls can reasonably be used among children.
BACKGROUND: Valid methods of diet assessment are important for nutrition research and practice, but can be difficult with children. OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 version of the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall for Children (ASA24-Kids-2012), a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall (24hDR) instrument, among children aged 9 to 11 years, in two sites. DESIGN: Quasiexperimental. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: In one site, trained staff members observed and recorded foods and drinks consumed by children (n=38) during school lunch. The next day, the observed children completed both ASA24-Kids-2012 and an interviewer-administered 24hDR in a randomized order. Procedures in a second site (n=31) were similar, except observations occurred during dinner in a community location. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Foods were classified as matches (reported and consumed), intrusions (reported, but not consumed), or omissions (not reported, but consumed) for each participant. Rates of matches, intrusions, and omissions were calculated. Rates were compared between each recall method using repeated measures analysis of covariance. For matched foods, the authors determined correlation coefficients between observed and reported serving sizes. RESULTS: Match, intrusion, and omission rates between ASA24-Kids-2012 and observed intakes in Site 1 were 37%, 27%, and 35%, respectively. Comparable rates for interviewer-administered 24hDRs were 57%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. In Site 2, match, intrusion, and omission rates between ASA24-Kids-2012 and observed intakes were 53%, 12%, and 36%, respectively, vs 76% matches, 9% intrusions, and 15% omissions for interviewer-administered 24hDRs. The relationship strength between reported and observed serving sizes for matched foods was 0.18 in Site 1 and 0.09 in Site 2 for ASA24-Kids-2012, and 0.46 in Site 1 and 0.11 in Site 2 for interviewer-administered 24hDRs. CONCLUSIONS:ASA24-Kids-2012 was less accurate than interviewer-administered 24hDRs when compared with observed intakes, but both performed poorly. Additional research should assess the age at which children can complete recalls without the help of a parent or guardian, as well as elucidate under which circumstances recalls can reasonably be used among children.
Authors: Suzanne Domel Baxter; Albert F Smith; Mark S Litaker; Caroline H Guinn; Michele D Nichols; Patricia H Miller; Katherine Kipp Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2006-10
Authors: Donna Spruijt-Metz; Cheng K Fred Wen; Brooke M Bell; Stephen Intille; Jeannie S Huang; Tom Baranowski Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-08-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Andrea B Goldschmidt; E Whitney Evans; Jared M Saletin; Katie O'Sullivan; Dorit Koren; Scott G Engel; Alissa Haedt-Matt Journal: Appetite Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Marilyn Stern; Jennifer Bleck; Linda J Ewing; Esther Davila; Courtney Lynn; Gregory Hale; Suzanne Mazzeo Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Suzanne D Baxter; David B Hitchcock; Julie A Royer; Albert F Smith; Caroline H Guinn Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Amanda Raffoul; Erin P Hobin; Jocelyn E Sacco; Kirsten M Lee; Jess Haines; Paula J Robson; Kevin W Dodd; Sharon I Kirkpatrick Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Maggie Grabow; Thomas Bryan; Mary Checovich; Alexander Converse; Cathy Middlecamp; Margaret Mooney; Elisa Torres; Samuel Younkin; Bruce Barrett Journal: Sustainability Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 3.251