Literature DB >> 31006813

School-Age Children Can Recall Some Foods and Beverages Consumed the Prior Day Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) without Assistance.

Amanda Raffoul1, Erin P Hobin2, Jocelyn E Sacco3, Kirsten M Lee1, Jess Haines4, Paula J Robson5, Kevin W Dodd6, Sharon I Kirkpatrick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technological innovations allow for collection of 24-h recalls (24HRs) in a broader range of studies than previously possible. The web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) has been shown to be feasible and to perform well in capturing true intake among adults. However, data to inform use with children are limited.
OBJECTIVE: This observational feeding study was conducted to evaluate children's ability to accurately report a lunchtime meal using ASA24 without assistance.
METHODS: The study was conducted among children (n = 100) aged 10-13 y within a school setting. Students were served an individual cheese pizza, baby carrots, ranch dip, yogurt, a cookie, and 1 choice of water, juice, or milk. Plate waste was collected and weighed. The next day, participants completed ASA24 and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were generated to determine match rates by food item and age, and linear regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and accuracy of reported energy and nutrient intake. Associations between true and reported energy and nutrient intakes and portion sizes were assessed with use of t tests.
RESULTS: Just under half (49%) of children fully completed ASA24 (median time, 41 min). Children reported an exact, close, or far match for 58% of all foods and beverages consumed, ranging from 29% for dip to 76% for pizza, but also reported some items not consumed as part of the study meal. Older children completed the recall in a shorter time than younger children (mean 31 among 13 y compared with 52 min among 10 y). Intakes of energy (39%), protein (33%), and sodium (78%) were significantly overestimated, whereas portion sizes for cookies (53%) and juice (69%) were underestimated.
CONCLUSIONS: Children can report some foods and drinks consumed using ASA24, but our findings suggest challenges with independent completion, necessitating research to examine strategies, such as training and resources, to support data quality.
Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  24-h recalls; Automated Self-Administered Dietary Assessment Tool; children; dietary intake; validation feeding study

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31006813      PMCID: PMC6698634          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxz013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  28 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of dietary intake in children.

Authors:  M B Livingstone; P J Robson
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 2.  Technology-based methods of dietary assessment: recent developments and considerations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Brent J Shriver; Carmen R Roman-Shriver; Joann D Long
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Children's accuracy of portion size estimation using digital food images: effects of interface design and size of image on computer screen.

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Janice C Baranowski; Kathleen B Watson; Shelby Martin; Alicia Beltran; Noemi Islam; Hafza Dadabhoy; Su-heyla Adame; Karen Cullen; Debbe Thompson; Richard Buday; Amy Subar
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Issues in dietary intake assessment of children and adolescents.

Authors:  M B E Livingstone; P J Robson; J M W Wallace
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 5.  Measuring dietary intake in children and adolescents in the context of overweight and obesity.

Authors:  C E Collins; Jane Watson; T Burrows
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Accuracy of estimates of food portion size using food photographs--the importance of using age-appropriate tools.

Authors:  Emma Foster; John N S Matthews; Michael Nelson; Julie M Harris; John C Mathers; Ashley J Adamson
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Influence of body composition on the accuracy of reported energy intake in children.

Authors:  J O Fisher; R K Johnson; C Lindquist; L L Birch; M I Goran
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2000-11

Review 8.  A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water.

Authors:  Tracy L Burrows; Rebecca J Martin; Clare E Collins
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-10

9.  Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Victor Kipnis; Richard P Troiano; Douglas Midthune; Dale A Schoeller; Sheila Bingham; Carolyn O Sharbaugh; Jillian Trabulsi; Shirley Runswick; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Joel Sunshine; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Children's Social Desirability and Dietary Reports.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; Albert F Smith; Mark S Litaker; Michelle L Baglio; Caroline H Guinn; Nicole M Shaffer
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.045

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Qualitative Analysis of the Remote Food Photography Method and the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool for Assessing Children's Food Intake Reported by Parent Proxy.

Authors:  Traci A Bekelman; Susan L Johnson; Rachel I Steinberg; Corby K Martin; Katherine A Sauder; Sophie Luckett-Cole; Deborah H Glueck; Daniel S Hsia; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 5.234

2.  Association between gut MIcrobiota, GROWth and Diet in peripubertal children from the TARGet Kids! cohort (The MiGrowD) study: protocol for studying gut microbiota at a community-based primary healthcare setting.

Authors:  Paraskevi Massara; Carolyn Spiegel-Feld; Jill Hamilton; Jonathon L Maguire; Catherine Birken; Robert Bandsma; Elena M Comelli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  A comparison of the remote food photography method and the automated self-administered 24-h dietary assessment tool for measuring full-day dietary intake among school-age children.

Authors:  Traci A Bekelman; Corby K Martin; Susan L Johnson; Deborah H Glueck; Katherine A Sauder; Kylie K Harrall; Rachel I Steinberg; Daniel S Hsia; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Early Lifestyle Intervention for Obesity Prevention in Pediatric Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Fang Fang Zhang; Michael Kelly; Mengxi Du; Jennifer G Welch; Nadine Santacruz; Jacqueline Rhoades; Christina Luongo Kamins; ZoAnn Dreyer; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Validation of a Web-Based, Time-Use Application to Assess Children's School Meal Intakes: My E-Diary for Activities and Lifestyle (MEDAL).

Authors:  Sarah Yi Xuan Tan; Airu Chia; Ray Sugianto; Huiying Eunice Tong; Ian Yi Han Ang; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Seang Mei Saw; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Mary Foong-Fong Chong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Automated Self-Administered 24-H Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) recalls for parent proxy-reporting of children's intake (> 4 years of age): a feasibility study.

Authors:  Isobel Sharpe; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Brendan T Smith; Charles D G Keown-Stoneman; Jessica Omand; Shelley Vanderhout; Jonathon L Maguire; Catherine S Birken; Laura N Anderson
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-06-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.