| Literature DB >> 25887588 |
Shiri Freilich1, Shery Lev2, Itay Gonda3, Eli Reuveni4, Vitaly Portnoy5, Elad Oren6, Marc Lohse7, Navot Galpaz8,9, Einat Bar10, Galil Tzuri11, Guy Wissotsky12, Ayala Meir13, Joseph Burger14, Yaakov Tadmor15, Arthur Schaffer16, Zhangjun Fei17, James Giovannoni18, Efraim Lewinsohn19, Nurit Katzir20.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melon (Cucumis melo) fruits exhibit phenotypic diversity in several key quality determinants such as taste, color and aroma. Sucrose, carotenoids and volatiles are recognized as the key compounds shaping the above corresponding traits yet the full network of biochemical events underlying their synthesis have not been comprehensively described. To delineate the cellular processes shaping fruit quality phenotypes, a population of recombinant inbred lines (RIL) was used as a source of phenotypic and genotypic variations. In parallel, ripe fruits were analyzed for both the quantified level of 77 metabolic traits directly associated with fruit quality and for RNA-seq based expression profiles generated for 27,000 unigenes. First, we explored inter-metabolite association patterns; then, we described metabolites versus gene association patterns; finally, we used the correlation-based associations for predicting uncharacterized synthesis pathways.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25887588 PMCID: PMC4448286 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0449-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Diversity of fruit quality associated traits within the RIL population. Top: Ripe fruit of the parental lines PI 414723 (left) and Dulce (right). Bottom: Distribution values of selected metabolites across the RILs population. Parental values are shown at green (PI 414723) and orange (Dulce). Accumulation values across RILs are provided at Additional file 3; units are as detailed for parental values. Parental values (PI 414723/Dulce): sucrose: 4.5/52.1 mg/g; β-carotene: 1.4/9.7 ug/g F.W.; pH: 4.6/6.6; ethylene: 235/54 ppm/kg/hour; methyl 3-(methylthio)propionate: 0/34 ng compound/gr F.W.; ethyl butanoate: 4.6/23.3 ng compound/gr F.W.
Full name, abbreviation, and classification into metabolic category of the metabolites analyzed
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Alcohols | A1 | Ethanol |
| A2 | 2-(methylthio)ethanol | |
| A3 | 3(methylthio)propanol | |
| A4 | Benzyl alcohol | |
| A5 | Benzenepropanol | |
| Acetate Esters | AE1 | Cinnamyl acetate |
| AE2 | Benzyl acetate | |
| AE3 | Phenethyl acetate | |
| AE4 | 3-phyenyl-1-propanol acetate | |
| AE5 | 2-methylbutyl acetate | |
| AE6 | 2-methylpropyl acetate | |
| AE7 | Butyl acetate | |
| AE8 | Hexyl acetate | |
| Aldehydes | ALD1 | 3-(methylthio)propanal |
| ALD2 | Benzylaldehyde | |
| ALD3 | Phenylacetaldehyde | |
| ALD4 | ( | |
| ALD5 | Hexanal | |
| ALD6 | 2,6-( | |
| Apocarotenoids | AP1 | 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (MHO) |
| AP2 | β-cyctocitral | |
| AP3 | α-ionone | |
| AP4 | Geranyl acetone | |
| AP5 | β-ionone | |
| AP6 | β-ionone epoxide | |
| AP7 | β-( | |
| Carotenoids | C1 | Lutein |
| C2 | β-carotene | |
| C3 | ζ-carotene | |
| C4 | α-carotene | |
| C5 | Phytoene | |
| Esters | E1 | Benzyl propanoate |
| Ethyl Esters | EE1 | Ethyl acetate |
| EE2 | Ethyl propanoate | |
| EE3 | Ethyl 2-methyl propanoate | |
| EE4 | Ethyl butanoate | |
| EE5 | Ethyl 2-methylbutanoate | |
| EE6 | Ethyl pentanoate | |
| EE7 | Ethyl hexanoate | |
| EE8 | Ethyl heptanoate | |
| EE9 | Ethyl octanoate | |
| EE10 | Ethyl benzoate | |
| EE11 | Ethyl decanoate | |
| Ethyl Esters/Thio-Ester Ester | EE12/TEE2 | Ethyl (methylthio) acetate |
| EE13/TEE4 | Ethyl (3-methylthio)propanoate | |
| Ethyl Esters | EE14 | Ethyl tiglate |
| EE15 | Ethyl phenyl acetate | |
| EE16 | Ethyl cinnamate | |
| Ethylene | H1 | Ethylene |
| Methyl Esters | ME1 | Methyl benzoate |
| ME2 | Methyl cinnamate | |
| ME3 | Methyl-2-methylbutanoate; | |
| Phenolic Derivatives | PD1 | Benzenacetonitrile |
| PD2 | Eugenol | |
| PD3 | Phenetyl alcohol | |
| PD4 | Cinnamyl alcohol | |
| pH | pH | pH |
| Sugars | S1 | Sucrose |
| S2 | Glucose | |
| S3 | Fructose | |
| Sulfide | SD1 | Dimethyl disulfide |
| SD2 | Dimethyl trisulfide | |
| Tocopherols | T1 | δ-tocopherol |
| T2 | γ-tocopherol | |
| T3 | α-tocopherol | |
| Thio Esters | TE1 |
|
| TE2 |
| |
| TE3 |
| |
| TE4 |
| |
| TE5 |
| |
| Thio-Ester Ester | TEE1 | Methyl 2-methylthio acetate |
| TEE3 | Methyl 3-(methylthio)propionate | |
| TEE5 | 3-(methylthio)propyl acetate | |
| TEE6 | 2-(methylthio) ethyl acetate | |
| Thiol | TL1 | Methanethiol |
| Volatile Acids | VA1 | Benzoic acid |
| VA2 | Cinnamic acid |
Figure 2Associations between metabolites accumulation and cellular processes. Accumulation values were recorded for 76 metabolites directly associated with fruit quality (sweetness, color, aroma) as well as pH values (acidity). (A) Illustration of the proposed synthesis pathways of the metabolites in analysis. (B) Metabolites versus metabolites correlation matrix (Spearman’s rho coefficient). (C) Metabolites versus metabolites network. The network describes 403 positive associations (red) and 87 negative associations (blue). The layout of the network visualizes the clusters in the data (Methods). Nodes fill color is according to biochemical groups (as in panel B); border color is according to the clusters in panel B (Cluster I –black; Cluster II – light green; Cluster III – light blue). The full names of the metabolites are listed in Table 1.
Gene-metabolite correlation values between alcohol acyl-transferases versus experimental evidence for their metabolic association
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Butyl acetate | AE7 | 0.34 (0.0009) | High | NS | ND |
| Hexyl acetate | AE8 | 0.29 (0.004) | High | NS | ND |
| 2-methylpropyl acetate acetate | AE6 | 0.34 (0.0008) | Low | NS | ND |
| Benzyl acetate | AE2 | 0.28 (0.006) | High | NS | ND |
| Cinnamyl acetate | AE1 | 0.41 (3.43e-05) | Medium | NS | ND |
| Ethyl phenyl acetate | EE15 | NS | Medium | NS | ND |
| Ethyl propanoate | EE2 | NS | ND | NS | ND |
| Ethyl butanoate | EE4 | NS | Low | NS | ND |
| Ethyl 2-methyl propanoate | EE3 | NS | ND | NS | ND |
| Ethyl hexanoate | EE7 | NS | Low | NS | ND |
| Ethyl heptanoate | EE8 | NS | NA | 0.22 (0.03) | NA |
| Ethyl octanoate | EE9 | NG | NA | 0.22 (0.03) | NA |
| Ethyl (methylthio) acetate | EE12/TEE2 | NS | NA | 0.24 (0.02) | NA |
|
| TE3 | NS | NA | 0.20 (0.04) | NA |
| Methyl 2-methylthio acetate | TEE1 | NG | NA | 0.26 (0.008) | NA |
| Methyl 3-(methylthio)propionate | TEE3 | NG | NA | 0.21 (0.008) | NA |
Upper part of the table: Metabolic evidence is based on in vitro experiments [13] testing the product specificity of Cm-AAT1-4. The ten metabolites in the upper part of the table were retrieved from the crossing of the 29 ester products tested at [13] with our set of metabolites. Cm-AAT3 (MELO3C024769 and MELO3C024762) and Cm-AAT4 (MELO3C017688) were detected at very low levels at the ripe fruit across the RIL population (Additional file 4) hence correlation values were not computed Median expression values (RPKM) across the RIL population for MELO3C024771 (Cm-AAT1), MELO3C024766 (Cm-AAT2), MELO3C024769 (Cm-AAT3), MELO3C024762 (Cm-AAT3) and MELO3C017688 (Cm-AAT4), respectively: 6777.400, 2881.290, 0.075, 0.840 and 0.000. Lower part of the table: metabolites (out of the 76 metabolites in the data set) with significant (<0.05) positive correlation with CmAAT2. The catalytic ability of CmAAT2 to produce the 6 metabolites was not tested at [13]. In vitro assays not carry at the reference work [13] are marked as NA.
*Full names are as in Table 1.
ζNS – not significant (p value > 0.05); NG – negative correlation; NA - In vitro assays not carry at the reference work [13].
§According to [13]. High production levels: > 1000 mg−1; medium production levels: 100–1000 mg−1; low production levels: < 100 mg−1; ND – not detected.
Figure 3A heatmap of over-represented categories from the metabolites versus genes correlation data. The level of representation of genes positively and negatively correlated with metabolites across all level of MapMan categories was subjected to cumulative hypergeometric distribution tests. Categories that are significantly enriched in positively correlated genes are colored in red (light red: 0.01 < P value < = 0.05; dark red: < P value < = 0.01); Categories that are significantly enriched in negatively correlated genes are colored in blue (light blue: 0.01 < P value < = 0.05; dark blue: < P value < = 0.01). For each category (rows) numbers in bracts are indicative of its level of classification (left) and the number of genes assigned to the category (left). (A) Categories at the top level of classification. Metabolites are ordered according to their classification pattern at the metabolites versus metabolites analysis (Figure 2B). Representative metabolites are marked in green. (B) Top over-represented categories across all MapMan classification levels. Five top categories were selected for each representative metabolite according to P values (Methods). Only over-representation of positively-correlated genes was considered. Metabolites are ordered consequently, according to their classification pattern at the metabolites versus metabolites analysis (Figure 2B). The full names of the metabolites are listed in Table 1. In order to simplify the visualization the original 97 categories were reduced into 83 by choosing single category to represent several similar categories (considering their higher level path) sharing the same enrichment profile across metabolites. E.g., a single category was chosen from the following categories at level 7: protein.synthesis.ribosomal-protein.prokaryotic.chloroplast.50S.subunit.L28; protein.synthesis.ribosomal-protein.prokaryotic.chloroplast.50S.subunit.L10; protein.synthesis.ribosomal-protein.prokaryotic.chloroplast.30S subunit.PSRP3; and protein.synthesis.ribosomal-protein.prokaryotic.chloroplast.50S subunit.L18 – all categories showing over-representation of genes positively correlated with pH.
Figure 4Associating groups of genes and cellular processes accompanying the accumulation of metabolites. The full names of the metabolites are listed in Table 1. (A) Metabolites versus genes correlation matrix (Spearman’s rho coefficient). The heatmap display correlation values for the 17 representative metabolic traits detailed at Figure 3B. 6129 genes were significantly correlated with at least a single representative metabolic trait (|r| > 0.3). The rows in the heat map are the genes clustered by their expression patterns and the columns are the metabolic traits. Gene groups (marked at green, black and red) were selected by cutting the tree. (B) A heat map of over-represented categories from the black, green and red gene groups marked at (A). The level of representation of genes within each group across the top level of MapMan categories was subjected to cumulative hypergeometric distribution tests. Categories that are significantly enriched are colored in red (light red: 0.01 < P value < = 0.05; dark red: < P value < = 0.01). For each category (rows) numbers in bracts are indicative of its level of classification (left) and the number of genes assigned to the category (left).
Figure 5Highlighting enzymes from three gene groups on top of the generic KEGG metabolic pathway. Genes were classified into three groups (black, red and green) according to their clustering pattern at the metabolites versus genes correlation matrix (Figure 4). Following mapping gene accessions to ECs (Methods), only ECs that were classified into a single gene group were further highlighted.