| Literature DB >> 22479206 |
David Toubiana1, Yaniv Semel, Takayuki Tohge, Romina Beleggia, Luigi Cattivelli, Leah Rosental, Zoran Nikoloski, Dani Zamir, Alisdair R Fernie, Aaron Fait.
Abstract
To investigate the regulation of seed metabolism and to estimate the degree ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22479206 PMCID: PMC3315483 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 5.917
Figure 1Heat map of metabolites measured across the IL collection during season I.
Heat map representation of changes in metabolite levels measured on dry IL seeds of harvest season I in Akko, Israel. Significance of fold change with respect to cultivar M82 (control) was evaluated by Dunnett's test. Blue rectangles indicate a significant decrease in metabolite content, and red rectangles, a significant increase in metabolite content. Pink areas indicate a non-significant change of metabolic concentrations. Metabolites were categorized according to their compound class. A mirror heat map of significance values is given in Figure S1. Groups of metabolites for which changes were highly significant (p<0.001) are delimited within black rectangles and magnified outside the heat map.
Figure 2Significant metabolites identified for different ILs in season I.
Bar graph representation of significant metabolites identified by Dunnett's-test (p-value<0.05 – after Bonferroni correction) as applied to dry IL seeds of harvest season I in Akko, Israel, in comparison with the control M82. Each bar graph depicts a single metabolite and fold change as compared to M82. Control (M82) levels are shown in dark blue. Metabolites are categorized according to their compound class.
Figure 3Mapping of significant changes in metabolite content onto introgressed segments.
Visualization of significant changes as compared to M82 as identified by Dunnett's test applied to IL season I harvest in Akko, Israel. The chromosomes and the site of introgression are schematically presented with the associated metabolites. Only metabolites exhibiting a significant difference from the control value (p-value<0.05, after the Bonferroni correction) are shown. Values next to metabolites indicate a positive (green) or negative (red), respectively, change in comparison with the value for the control M82. Each value is based on a fold change, e.g., glycolate on IL1-1-2 indicates a +1.2 significant increase = (control) 1+1.2 = 2.2 higher content of glycolate in IL 1-1-2 than in the control M82. Metabolites were categorized according to their compound class (see color key on the Figure).
Figure 4mQTL map of shared significant changes over seasons I and II.
GC-MS measurements were performed for consecutive seasons I and II in Akko, Israel; metabolic concentrations were measured in dry seeds. The putative mQTL and their associated metabolites are depicted in the Figure. Symbols next to putative mQTL indicate results of pairwise 2-way ANOVA for each metabolite across the seasons of matching ILs. Blue symbols refer to the single term – genotype; yellow symbols refer to the interaction term – season * genotype. Blue and yellow ticks indicate confirmed by single or interaction term, respectively; blue and yellow crosses indicate not confirmed by single or interaction term, respectively.
Figure 5Tests of heritability as estimated on a tomato seed and fruit IL population.
Coefficient of variation (CV) values were calculated by taking the ratio of the standard deviation over the mean for every metabolite individually for each IL and M82. Thereafter, the resulting CV values were divided into 40 bins of incrementing intervals of 0.1, for which the relative frequencies in the wild type and the ILs were estimated in both the fruit and in the seed (panel a). Broad-sense heritability (H2) values were calculated for all metabolites on the background of the seed and fruit IL population across two and three seasons, respectively. Values of H2 were divided into bins of 0.1 intervals. Bar graphs represent the total number for each respective bin on the background of the seed and fruit population (panel b). For exact estimation of H2 values see Methods and Materials.
Figure 6Morphological traits—metabolite correlation/significance.
Correlation between metabolic data as analyzed on dry IL seeds of harvest season I in Akko, Israel and the ILs' morphological traits. The Pearson product-moment correlation was used to calculate all pairwise correlations between morphological traits and metabolites heading the rows and morphological traits and metabolites heading the columns. In the colored area, rectangles represent r values resulting from Pearson correlation coefficient computation (see correlation color key). In the black and white area, rectangles represent p-values respective to Pearson correlation coefficient (see Significance color key). Z-score transformation was employed to enable correlation computation. X and Y-axes are categorized into morphological traits and metabolites, grouped by compound classes.
Network measures estimated on fruit and seed datasets.
| Network | Density | Degree | Clustering coefficient | Diameter | ||||
| value | p-value | value | p-value | value | p-value | value | p-value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 Fruit IL network | 0.032 | 0.001 | 2.49 | 0.001 | 0.45 | 0.001 | 9 | 1.000 |
| 16 Fruit IL network | 0.036 | 0.001 | 2.77 | 0.001 | 0.44 | 0.001 | 12 | 1.000 |
| 17 Fruit IL network | 0.040 | 0.001 | 3.05 | 0.001 | 0.43 | 0.001 | 12 | 1.000 |
| 18 Fruit IL network | 0.043 | 0.001 | 3.28 | 0.001 | 0.47 | 0.001 | 13 | 1.000 |
| 19 Fruit IL network | 0.041 | 0.001 | 3.18 | 0.001 | 0.45 | 0.001 | 11 | 1.000 |
| 20 Fruit IL network | 0.043 | 0.001 | 3.31 | 0.001 | 0.43 | 0.001 | 10 | 1.000 |
| 21 Fruit IL network | 0.047 | 0.001 | 3.59 | 0.001 | 0.49 | 0.001 | 11 | 1.000 |
| 22 Fruit IL network | 0.047 | 0.001 | 3.62 | 0.001 | 0.47 | 0.001 | 9 | 1.000 |
| 23 Fruit IL network | 0.044 | 0.001 | 3.72 | 0.001 | 0.43 | 0.001 | 11 | 1.000 |
| 24 Fruit IL network | 0.044 | 0.001 | 3.77 | 0.001 | 0.43 | 0.001 | 10 | 1.000 |
| 25 Fruit IL network | 0.047 | 0.001 | 3.77 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 0.001 | 12 | 1.000 |
| 50 Fruit IL network | 0.078 | 0.001 | 5.97 | 0.001 | 0.47 | 0.001 | 11 | 1.000 |
| 76 Fruit IL network | 0.15 | 0.001 | 8.18 | 0.001 | 0.38 | 0.001 | 7 | 1.000 |
p value based on 1,000 permutations.
Individual ILs were ranked according to increasing difference in variance of the fruit dataset compared to the average variance in the seed dataset (Table S8). Network properties were calculated from a network reconstructed by using the data from the ordered list of ILs. For instance, for n = 25, the 25 ILs from Table S8 were used in creation of the correlation network associated to the data from only these n = 25 ILs. Subsets comprising the first 15 to 25, 50 and 76 of the fruit ILs ranked in non-decreasing order with respect to their variance were used to construct correlation-based networks (r≥0.3, p≤0.01). Four network properties were calculated for each subset-based fruit network: density, degree, clustering coefficient, and diameter (value). Values represent the estimates of the respective network measures for each subset of fruit ILs. By performing the classical permutation test with 1,000 repetitions, the statistical significance of the differences in measures between the subset-based fruit networks and the seed network (first data row in the table) were measured. In each permutation, the order of each metabolite within the subset was randomized, and the newly ordered dataset was subjected to correlation analysis and network measures estimation. The difference between newly generated network property values in the seed and the fruit, upon randomization, were tested to check whether their value is at most that of the difference for the original networks. Subsequently, the total number of occurrences meeting this criterion formed the basis for the empirical p-value estimation. With the exception of the network diameter, density, degree, and clustering coefficient of the fruit IL subset networks are significantly different from the corresponding measures in the seed network.
Figure 7Seed-fruit metabolite network.
Network visualization of metabolites as analyzed on dry IL seed and fruit metabolites of harvest season I in Akko, Israel. Metabolites are represented as nodes, and their relations, as edges. The Pearson product-moment correlation was employed to compute all pairwise correlations between metabolites across the entire set of ILs. Only significant correlations are depicted. A significance level of ≤0.01 and an r-value of ≥0.3 were considered to be significant. Seed metabolites are depicted as circular black-bordered nodes, fruit metabolites are depicted as diamond-shaped red-bordered nodes. Metabolites are color coded and clustered according to their compound classes. The two tissue sub-networks are separated spatially into the left region (seed network) and right region (fruit network). Positive correlations are denoted as blue edges, and negative correlations are denoted as red edges. Computations of the correlations were conducted under the R environment. Cytoscape was used to generate the graphical output of the networks.
Figure 8Degree of connectivity cluster network.
Network visualization of metabolites as analyzed on dry seed and the fruit of IL season I harvest in Akko, Israel. Metabolites are presented as nodes, and their relations, as edges. The Pearson product-moment correlation was employed to compute all pairwise correlations across the entire set of ILs. Only significant correlations are shown. Clusters of high connectivity of metabolites were generated on the basis of the network presented in Figure 7 by applying the clustering algorithm supplied by the NeMo for Cytoscape plug-in. Metabolites were clustered together on the basis of the degree of connectivity to adjacent metabolites. The two main clusters (seed-fruit) were verified by computing the modularity value Q by using the fast greedy community algorithm under the R environment. Seed metabolites are depicted as circular black-bordered nodes, and fruit metabolites are depicted as diamond-shaped red-bordered nodes. Positive correlations are denoted as blue edges, and negative correlations, as red edges. Computations of the correlations were conducted under the R environment. Cytoscape was used to generate the graphical output of network.
Figure 9Bipartite cross-seasonal correlation network.
Bipartite cross-seasonal network visualization of metabolites as analyzed on dry IL seeds of harvest seasons I and II in Akko, Israel. Metabolites were correlated employing Pearson's correlation coefficient among seasons and ordered according to their compound classes. Nodes represent metabolites of harvest seasons I and II, respectively. Edges represent significant correlations across seasons among metabolites. Blue edges depict positive correlation, and red edges, negative correlations. A significance level of ≤0.01 and an r-value of ≥0.3 were considered to be significant. Computations of the correlations were conducted under the R environment. Cytoscape was used to generate the graphical output of the network.