Literature DB >> 25881875

Marital status and female and male contraceptive sterilization in the United States.

Mieke Carine Wim Eeckhaut1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine female and male sterilization patterns in the United States based on marital status, and to determine if sociodemographic characteristics explain these patterns.
DESIGN: Survival analysis of cross-sectional data from the female and male samples from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): The survey is designed to be representative of the US civilian noninstitutionalized population, ages 15-44 years. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vasectomy and tubal sterilization. RESULT(S): In the United States, vasectomy is the near-exclusive domain of married men. Never-married and ever-married single men, and never-married cohabiting men, had a low relative risk (RR) of vasectomy (RR = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.0, respectively), compared with men in first marriages. Tubal sterilization was not limited to currently married, or even to ever-married women, although it was less common among never-married single women (RR = 0.2) and more common among women in higher-order marriages (RR = 1.8), compared with women in first marriages. In contrast to vasectomy, differential use of tubal sterilization by marital status was driven in large part by differences in parity. CONCLUSION(S): This study shows that being unmarried at the time of sterilization--an important risk factor for poststerilization regret--was much more common among women than men. In addition to contributing to the predominance of female, vs. male, sterilization, this pattern highlights the importance of educating women on the permanency of sterilization, and the opportunity to increase reliance on long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Survey of Family Growth; Tubal sterilization; contraception; marital status; vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25881875      PMCID: PMC4457547          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  26 in total

1.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Robert M Groves; William D Mosher; James M Lepkowski; Nicole G Kirgis
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  2009-09

3.  Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  S D Hillis; P A Marchbanks; L R Tylor; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995.

Authors:  Jo Jones; William Mosher; Kimberly Daniels
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2012-10-18

Review 5.  Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization.

Authors:  L L Bumpass; E Thomson; A L Godecker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Contraceptive sterilization use among married men in the United States: results from the male sample of the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  John E Anderson; Lee Warner; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry M Kissin; Ajay K Nangia; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Gladys M Martinez; Anjani Chandra; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones; William D Mosher
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2006-05

8.  The effect of stepchildren on childbearing intentions and births.

Authors:  Susan D Stewart
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-02

9.  Patterns of men's use of sexual and reproductive health services.

Authors:  Debra Kalmuss; Carrie Tatum
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2007-06

10.  Forgettable contraception.

Authors:  David A Grimes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  8 in total

1.  Free radical scavenging window of infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: correlation with embryo quality.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Zhou Li; Xinling Ren; Jihui Ai; Lixia Zhu; Lei Jin
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Changing Educational Differentials in Female Sterilization.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford; Alexandra Kissling; Karen Benjamin Guzzo
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-05-28

3.  Contraceptive Sterilization: Introducing A Couple Perspective to Examine Sociodemographic Differences in Use.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2017-07-24

4.  The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-21

5.  Understanding Sterilization Regret in the United States: The Role of Relationship Context.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2018-05-17

6.  A Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate Health-Related Behaviors in 602 Women of Reproductive Age in Poland.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Anna Studnicka; Sylwia Rychlewicz; Agnieszka Iwan; Ewa Rzońca; Mansur Rahnama
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-12-30

7.  Demographics of men receiving vasectomies in Poland 2019-2020.

Authors:  Emilia Pawłowska-Krajka; Mateusz Bajkowski; Adam Dorobek; Bartosz Hnatowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-05-18

8.  Transcervical administration of polidocanol foam prevents pregnancy in female baboons.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Jensen; Carol Hanna; Shan Yao; Emily Thompson; Cassondra Bauer; Ov D Slayden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.375

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.