Literature DB >> 10362150

Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

S D Hillis1, P A Marchbanks, L R Tylor, H B Peterson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cumulative probability of regret after tubal sterilization, and to identify risk factors for regret that are identifiable before sterilization.
METHODS: We used a prospective, multicenter cohort study to evaluate the cumulative probability of regret within 14 years after tubal sterilization. Participants included 11,232 women aged 18-44 years who had tubal sterilizations between 1978 and 1987. Actuarial life tables and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify those groups at greatest risk of experiencing regret.
RESULTS: The cumulative probability of expressing regret during a follow-up interview within 14 years after tubal sterilization was 20.3% for women aged 30 or younger at the time of sterilization and 5.9% for women over age 30 at sterilization (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 2.3). For the former group, the cumulative probability of regret was similar for women sterilized during the postpartum period (after cesarean, 20.3%, 95% CI 14.5, 26.0; after vaginal delivery, 23.7%, 95% CI 17.6, 29.8) and for women sterilized within 1 year after the birth of their youngest child (22.3%, 95% CI 16.4, 28.2). For women aged 30 or younger at sterilization, the cumulative probability of regret decreased as time since the birth of the youngest child increased (2-3 years, 16.2%, 95% CI 11.4, 21.0; 4-7 years, 11.3%, 95% CI 7.8, 14.8; 8 or more years, 8.3%, 95% CI 5.1, 11.4) and was lowest among women who had no previous births (6.3%, 95% CI 3.1, 9.4).
CONCLUSION: Although most women expressed no regret after tubal sterilization, women 30 years of age and younger at the time of sterilization had an increased probability of expressing regret during follow-up interviews within 14 years after the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10362150     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00539-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  43 in total

1.  Pain and heavy bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Authors:  Sally B Rose
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-01

2.  Federally funded sterilization: time to rethink policy?

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Nikki Zite; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation.

Authors:  Lauren B Messinger; Connie E Alford; John M Csokmay; Melinda B Henne; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Urban-Rural Differences in Tubal Ligation Incidence in the State of Georgia, USA.

Authors:  Curtis D Travers; Jessica B Spencer; Carrie A Cwiak; Ann C Mertens; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Evidence-based guidance on Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use: identification of research gaps.

Authors:  Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Emily M Godfrey; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  Contraception in women over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Rebecca H Allen; Carrie A Cwiak; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Does a history of unintended pregnancy lessen the likelihood of desire for sterilization reversal?

Authors:  Cynthia D Grady; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Chetachi A Emeremni; Jonathan Yabes; Aletha Akers; Nikki Zite; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Reconsidering racial/ethnic differences in sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  State-mandated insurance coverage is associated with the approach to hydrosalpinges before IVF.

Authors:  Kenan Omurtag; Natalia M Grindler; Kimberly A Roehl; G Wright Bates; Angeline N Beltsos; Randall R Odem; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Unintended pregnancy influences racial disparity in tubal sterilization rates.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Charity G Moore; Li Qin; Eleanor B Schwarz; Aletha Akers; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.