Literature DB >> 26792541

The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.

Mieke C W Eeckhaut1, Megan M Sweeney1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the association between contraceptive sterilization and socio-economic status (measured by educational attainment) in ten countries, using data from the 2006-10 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2004-10 Generations and Gender Surveys. The findings confirm that a long-standing association between socio-economic status and sterilization persists in the contemporary United States: female sterilization is associated with economic disadvantage, whereas male sterilization is associated with economic advantage. The latter association is found to be unique to the United States, but female sterilization is associated with disadvantage in most of the other countries studied. While basic demographic background factors such as early childbearing and parity can explain the observed associations in most of the countries, a strong gendered association between sterilization and socio-economic status remains in the United States and Belgium even after adjusting for these factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States; comparative analysis; contraception; socio-economic status; sterilization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26792541      PMCID: PMC4798874          DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1122209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)        ISSN: 0032-4728


  44 in total

1.  Characteristics of men receiving vasectomies in the United States, 1998-1999.

Authors:  Mark A Barone; Christopher H Johnson; Melanie A Luick; Daria L Teutonico; Robert J Magnani
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

2.  Patterns of contraceptive use in Australia: analysis of the 2001 National Health Survey.

Authors:  Farhat Yusuf; Stefania Siedlecky
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2006-11-23

Review 3.  Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization.

Authors:  Grace Shih; David K Turok; Willie J Parker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  A survey of contraception in five west European countries.

Authors:  F E Riphagen; P Lehert
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1989-01

5.  Medical and contraceptive reasons for sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  R R Rindfuss; F Liao
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

6.  Contraceptive sterilization in the U. S.: 1965 and 1970.

Authors:  L L Bumpass; H B Presser
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1972-11

7.  Social and psychological perspectives on voluntary sterilization: a review.

Authors:  S G Philliber; W W Philliber
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

8.  Family planning and female sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  T M Shapiro; W Fisher; A Diana
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization.

Authors:  L L Bumpass; E Thomson; A L Godecker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Forgettable contraception.

Authors:  David A Grimes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  5 in total

1.  Desire for Sterilization Reversal Among U.S. Females: Increasing Inequalities by Educational Level.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney; Lei Feng
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-08-10

2.  Similarities and differences in contraceptive use reported by women and men in the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Abigail Ra Aiken; Yu Wang; Jenny Higgins; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Changing Educational Differentials in Female Sterilization.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford; Alexandra Kissling; Karen Benjamin Guzzo
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-05-28

4.  Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India.

Authors:  Gargi Pal; Himanshu Chaurasia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-05-16

5.  Women's Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Birth Timing and Birth Stopping.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Michael S Rendall; Polina Zvavitch
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.