Literature DB >> 24988814

Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995.

Jo Jones, William Mosher, Kimberly Daniels.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Use of contraception and the effectiveness of the method used to prevent pregnancy are major factors affecting national pregnancy and birth rates and the ability of women to plan their pregnancies. This report presents national estimates of contraceptive use among women of childbearing age (15-44 years) in 2006-2010. Selected comparisons are made with 1995 data to describe changes in contraceptive use and in method choice over time.
METHODS: Data for 2006-2010 were collected through in-person interviews with 22,682 women and men aged 15-44 years in the household population of the United States. Interviews were conducted by female interviewers in the homes of sampled persons. This report is based primarily on the sample of 12,279 women interviewed in 2006-2010; some tables are supplemented with the sample of 10,847 women interviewed in 1995.
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of women of reproductive age are currently using contraception. Of women using a contraceptive method in the month of the interview, the most common methods used are the pill (28%, or 10.6 million women) and female sterilization (27%, or 10.2 million women). Use of intrauterine devices as a current method has increased since 1995 (from 0.8% in 1995 to 5.6% in 2006-2010), whereas fewer women report that their partners are using condoms as their current, most effective contraceptive method. Of women at risk of an unintended pregnancy, 11% report not currently using a method of contraception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24988814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report        ISSN: 2164-8344


  139 in total

1.  Race-Ethnic Differences in the Non-marital Fertility Rates in 2006-2010.

Authors:  Yujin Kim; R Kelly Raley
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2014-08-08

2.  Oral contraceptive use and fracture risk around the menopausal transition.

Authors:  Delia Scholes; Andrea Z LaCroix; Rebecca A Hubbard; Laura E Ichikawa; Leslie Spangler; Belinda H Operskalski; Nancy Gell; Susan M Ott
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Combined nestorone-testosterone gel suppresses serum gonadotropins to concentrations associated with effective hormonal contraception in men.

Authors:  B D Anawalt; M Y Roth; J Ceponis; V Surampudi; J K Amory; R S Swerdloff; P Y Liu; C Dart; W J Bremner; R Sitruk-Ware; N Kumar; D L Blithe; S T Page; C Wang
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.842

4.  Likelihood of emergency contraception use among African-American women at risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Catherine E Lind; Emily M Godfrey; Kristin M Rankin; Arden S Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

5.  Positive Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in IUD Users.

Authors:  Natalia E Birgisson; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Comparison of prospective and retrospective measurements of frequency of sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Larissa R Brunner Huber; Jordan E Lyerly; Ashley M Young; Jacek Dmochowski; Tara M Vick; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-08

Review 8.  Systematic and meta-analytic review of research examining the impact of menstrual cycle phase and ovarian hormones on smoking and cessation.

Authors:  Andrea H Weinberger; Philip H Smith; Sharon S Allen; Kelly P Cosgrove; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray; Carolyn M Mazure; Cora Lee Wetherington; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Kira Levy; Alexandra M Minnis; Maureen Lahiff; Julie Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-12-07

Review 10.  Pipeline for contraceptive development.

Authors:  Diana L Blithe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.