Literature DB >> 25878823

Crystal structure of catena-poly[[cadmium(II)-di-μ2-bromido-μ2-l-proline-κ(2) O:O'] monohydrate].

S Sathiskumar1, T Balakrishnan1, K Ramamurthi2, S Thamotharan3.   

Abstract

In the title coordination polymer, {[CdBr2(n class="CellLine">C5H9NO2)]·H2O} n , the Cd(II) ion is coordinated by four bromido ligands and two carboxyl-ate oxygen atoms of two symmetry-related proline ligands, which exist in a zwitterionic form, in a distorted octa-hedral geometry. There is an intra-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bond between the amino group and the carboxyl-ate fragment. Each coordinating ligand bridges two Cd(II) atoms, thus forming polymeric chains running along the c-axis direction. The water mol-ecules of crystallization serve as donors for the weak inter-molecular O-H⋯O and O-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds that link adjacent polymeric chains, thus forming a three-dimensional structure. N-H⋯O and N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds also occur.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N/O—H⋯Br/O hydrogen bonds; cadmium coordination polymer; crystal structure; distorted octa­hedral geometry.; l-proline cadmium bromide

Year:  2015        PMID: 25878823      PMCID: PMC4384587          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

The characterization of second-order non-linear optical (NLO) materials is important because of their potential applications such as frequency shifting, optical modulation, optical switching, telecommunication and signal processing. It is known that the chiral amino acids and their complexes are potential materials for n class="Chemical">NLO applications (Eimerl et al., 1989 ▸; Pal et al., 2004 ▸; Srinivasan et al., 2006 ▸). This study is a part of an ongoing investigation of the crystal and mol­ecular structures of a series of amino acid–metal complexes (Sathiskumar et al., 2015 ▸; Balakrishnan et al., 2013 ▸).

Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of the title complex (I) (Fig. 1 ▸) contains one CdII ion, one proline and two bromido ligands, and one n class="Chemical">water mol­ecule of crystallization. The title complex has a very similar structure to that of the chloride analogue (Yukawa et al., 1983 ▸) and l-proline manganese dichloride monohydrate (Rzączyńska et al., 1997 ▸; Lamberts & Englert, 2012 ▸). In (I), proline exists in a zwitterionic form, as evident from the bond lengths involving the carboxyl­ate atoms and the protonation of the ring N atom of the pyrrolidine fragment. The CdII ion is coordinated by four bromido ligands [Cd—Br = 2.7236 (13)–2.7737 (12) Å] and two carboxyl­ate oxygen atoms [Cd—O = 2.312 (8) and 2.318 (8) Å] of two proline ligands in a slightly distorted octa­hedral geometry. The title complex is extended as a polymeric chain which runs parallel to the c axis. Within one chain, adjacent CdII ions are separated by 3.727 (1) Å. The closest Cd⋯Cd distance between neighbouring polymeric chains is 8.579 (2) Å. The five endocyclic torsion angles of the pyrrolidine ring of the proline residue are N1—C2—C3—C4 = 31.8 (13)°, C2—C3—C4—C5 = −39.1 (15)°, C3—C4—C5—N1 = 29.9 (14)°, C2—N1—C5—C4 = −9.7 (12)° and C5—N1—C2—C3 = −13.1 (11)°. The pyrrolidine ring exhibits twisted conformation on the C3—C4 bond with a pseudo-rotation angle Δ = 249.3 (12)° and a maximum torsion angle ϕm = 38.5 (8)° (Rao et al., 1981 ▸).
Figure 1

A portion of the crystal structure of the title complex, showing the atomic labeling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (a)  − x, −y, z − ; (b)  − x, −y, z + .]

In (I), as observed in the chloride analogue (Yukawa et al., 1983 ▸), there is an intra­molecular N1—H1A⋯O2 hydrogen bond between the amino group and the carboxyl­ate fragment.

Supra­molecular features

The crystal structure of (I), is stabilized by inter­molecular N—H⋯O, n class="Chemical">N—H⋯Br, O—H⋯O and O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸, Figs. 2 ▸ and 3 ▸). The water mol­ecules serve as donors for the weak O—H⋯O and O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) which link adjacent polymeric chains (Fig. 3 ▸), thus forming a three-dimensional structure.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
N1H1AO20.892.162.626(12)112
O1WH2WO10.84(17)2.6(2)3.175(19)132
O1WH2WBr20.84(17)2.8(3)3.311(19)123
N1H1AO1W i 0.892.052.90(2)159
N1H1BBr1ii 0.892.693.416(11)140
O1WH1WBr2iii 0.88(16)2.7(3)3.197(19)116

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 2

The crystal packing of (I) viewed along the a axis. Dashed lines denote inter­molecular hydrogen bonds. C-bound H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Figure 3

A portion of the crystal packing viewed along the a axis and showing hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) between two neighbouring polymeric chains.

Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.35, last update May 2014; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸) for the structures with metal ions coordinated by one of the carboxyl­ate n class="Chemical">oxygen atoms of the proline moiety yielded 44 hits. Of these, two structures contain a cadmium metal ion, viz. catena-[di­chlorido-(4-hy­droxy-l-proline)cadmium] (refcode BOHVID; Yukawa et al., 1982 ▸) and catena-[bis­(μ2-chlorido)(μ2-l-pro­line)cadmium monohydrate] (refcode BUXBUR; Yukawa et al., 1983 ▸). The latter structure is isotypic with the title complex. Another compound, catena-[bis­(μ2-chlorido)(μ2-l-prolinato-κ2-O,O′)manganese(II) monohydrate], has been structurally determined three times and has similar cell parameters and the same space group as the title compound (refcode ROJQEM: Rzączyńska et al., 1997 ▸; refcode ROJEQM01: Tilborg et al., 2010 ▸; refcode ROJQEM02: Lamberts & Englert, 2012 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

To prepare the title compound, l-proline (Loba) and cadmium bromide tetra­hydrate (Loba) in an equimolar ratio were dissolved in double-distilled water. The obtained solution of the homogeneous mixture was evaporated at room temperature to afford the white crystalline title compound, which was then recrystallized by slow evaporation from an aqueous solution.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. As the title compound is isotypic with its chlorido analogue (Yukawa et al., 1983 ▸), the atomic coordinates of the latter were used as starting values in the initial cycles of the refinement. The positions of water n class="Chemical">hydrogen atoms were calculated by method of Nardelli (1999 ▸). Further, the O—H and H1W⋯H2W distances of the water mol­ecules were restrained to 0.85 (2) and 1.38 (2) Å, respectively, using the DFIX option and included in the structure-factor calculations with U iso(H1W/H2W) = 1.1U eq(O1W). The remaining hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions (C—H = 0.97–0.98 Å and N—H = 0.89 Å) with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C/N) and were constrained to ride on their parent atoms. Reflections 110 and 020 were partially obscured by the beam stop and were omitted.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[CdBr2(C5H9NO2)]H2O
M r 405.37
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c ()10.1891(8), 13.4961(11), 7.4491(5)
V (3)1024.35(13)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)9.90
Crystal size (mm)0.35 0.30 0.30
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
T min, T max 0.129, 0.155
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections8264, 2481, 1964
R int 0.068
(sin /)max (1)0.666
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.041, 0.089, 1.06
No. of reflections2481
No. of parameters115
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3)1.02, 1.07
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 705 quotients [(I +)(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.035(15)

Computer programs: APEX2, SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014/6 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001176/cv5483sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001176/cv5483Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1044327 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[CdBr2(C5H9NO2)]·H2ODx = 2.629 Mg m3
Mr = 405.37Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, P212121Cell parameters from 4066 reflections
a = 10.1891 (8) Åθ = 5.0–55.2°
b = 13.4961 (11) ŵ = 9.90 mm1
c = 7.4491 (5) ÅT = 296 K
V = 1024.35 (13) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.35 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm
F(000) = 760
Bruker SMART CCD area detector diffractometer1964 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.068
ω and φ scanθmax = 28.2°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)h = −13→13
Tmin = 0.129, Tmax = 0.155k = −17→14
8264 measured reflectionsl = −9→6
2481 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0243P)2 + 1.4185P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.089(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06Δρmax = 1.02 e Å3
2481 reflectionsΔρmin = −1.07 e Å3
115 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 705 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
3 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.035 (15)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cd10.24415 (7)0.00192 (7)0.31349 (9)0.0425 (2)
Br10.44442 (8)0.03071 (8)0.06673 (14)0.0450 (3)
Br20.37743 (10)0.11262 (9)0.56256 (15)0.0537 (3)
O10.1309 (8)0.1397 (6)0.2136 (9)0.057 (2)
O20.1420 (7)0.1362 (6)−0.0865 (9)0.056 (2)
N1−0.0870 (10)0.2205 (8)−0.1393 (11)0.062 (3)
H1A−0.01680.2171−0.21000.075*
H1B−0.12020.2813−0.14710.075*
C10.0861 (9)0.1560 (7)0.0564 (15)0.039 (2)
C2−0.0488 (10)0.1988 (8)0.0510 (15)0.053 (3)
H2−0.05240.25960.12290.064*
C3−0.1523 (12)0.1260 (13)0.115 (2)0.084 (5)
H3A−0.11720.08260.20660.100*
H3B−0.22790.16070.16270.100*
C4−0.1878 (13)0.0697 (13)−0.047 (2)0.094 (5)
H4A−0.27330.0392−0.03260.113*
H4B−0.12360.0181−0.07010.113*
C5−0.1899 (14)0.1441 (12)−0.200 (2)0.086 (5)
H5A−0.27580.1743−0.21260.103*
H5B−0.16510.1134−0.31270.103*
O1W0.111 (2)0.2521 (17)0.587 (2)0.183 (8)
H1W0.11 (3)0.296 (11)0.50 (2)0.201*
H2W0.13 (3)0.197 (8)0.54 (3)0.201*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cd10.0453 (4)0.0579 (4)0.0243 (3)0.0069 (4)−0.0005 (2)0.0045 (3)
Br10.0347 (4)0.0679 (7)0.0323 (4)0.0033 (5)−0.0007 (4)−0.0001 (5)
Br20.0597 (6)0.0687 (7)0.0327 (5)−0.0117 (6)0.0013 (5)−0.0056 (6)
O10.074 (5)0.066 (5)0.032 (4)0.025 (4)−0.011 (3)−0.005 (4)
O20.059 (5)0.068 (5)0.043 (4)0.016 (4)0.005 (4)0.007 (4)
N10.063 (6)0.066 (7)0.058 (6)0.037 (6)−0.015 (5)−0.001 (5)
C10.040 (5)0.039 (5)0.039 (5)0.005 (4)−0.002 (5)−0.003 (5)
C20.053 (6)0.060 (7)0.046 (5)0.024 (6)−0.009 (6)−0.010 (6)
C30.043 (7)0.113 (13)0.095 (10)0.005 (8)0.018 (6)0.008 (10)
C40.042 (6)0.110 (12)0.130 (13)−0.008 (8)0.006 (9)−0.021 (13)
C50.075 (9)0.090 (11)0.091 (10)0.040 (9)−0.024 (8)−0.037 (9)
O1W0.178 (16)0.22 (2)0.153 (13)0.061 (18)0.007 (14)0.061 (17)
Cd1—O12.312 (8)N1—H1B0.8900
Cd1—O2i2.318 (8)C1—C21.491 (13)
Cd1—Br2ii2.7236 (13)C2—C31.517 (19)
Cd1—Br1i2.7285 (11)C2—H20.9800
Cd1—Br22.7421 (13)C3—C41.47 (2)
Cd1—Br12.7737 (12)C3—H3A0.9700
Br1—Cd1ii2.7285 (11)C3—H3B0.9700
Br2—Cd1i2.7236 (13)C4—C51.52 (2)
O1—C11.276 (12)C4—H4A0.9700
O2—C11.237 (12)C4—H4B0.9700
O2—Cd1ii2.318 (8)C5—H5A0.9700
N1—C21.499 (13)C5—H5B0.9700
N1—C51.537 (17)O1W—H1W0.87 (3)
N1—H1A0.8900O1W—H2W0.87 (3)
O1—Cd1—O2i179.9 (3)O1—C1—C2114.9 (9)
O1—Cd1—Br2ii90.50 (19)C1—C2—N1109.9 (9)
O2i—Cd1—Br2ii89.53 (19)C1—C2—C3112.4 (10)
O1—Cd1—Br1i90.0 (2)N1—C2—C3103.9 (10)
O2i—Cd1—Br1i90.03 (19)C1—C2—H2110.1
Br2ii—Cd1—Br1i93.59 (4)N1—C2—H2110.1
O1—Cd1—Br291.52 (19)C3—C2—H2110.1
O2i—Cd1—Br288.44 (19)C4—C3—C2104.5 (11)
Br2ii—Cd1—Br2177.29 (3)C4—C3—H3A110.9
Br1i—Cd1—Br288.22 (3)C2—C3—H3A110.9
O1—Cd1—Br192.4 (2)C4—C3—H3B110.9
O2i—Cd1—Br187.56 (19)C2—C3—H3B110.9
Br2ii—Cd1—Br187.67 (4)H3A—C3—H3B108.9
Br1i—Cd1—Br1177.27 (4)C3—C4—C5106.0 (12)
Br2—Cd1—Br190.44 (4)C3—C4—H4A110.5
Cd1ii—Br1—Cd185.27 (3)C5—C4—H4A110.5
Cd1i—Br2—Cd185.98 (3)C3—C4—H4B110.5
C1—O1—Cd1127.7 (6)C5—C4—H4B110.5
C1—O2—Cd1ii132.9 (7)H4A—C4—H4B108.7
C2—N1—C5108.9 (10)C4—C5—N1102.3 (10)
C2—N1—H1A109.9C4—C5—H5A111.3
C5—N1—H1A109.9N1—C5—H5A111.3
C2—N1—H1B109.9C4—C5—H5B111.3
C5—N1—H1B109.9N1—C5—H5B111.3
H1A—N1—H1B108.3H5A—C5—H5B109.2
O2—C1—O1126.0 (8)H1W—O1W—H2W106 (4)
O2—C1—C2119.0 (10)
Cd1ii—O2—C1—O144.5 (15)C5—N1—C2—C1107.4 (11)
Cd1ii—O2—C1—C2−132.7 (9)C5—N1—C2—C3−13.1 (11)
Cd1—O1—C1—O2−40.4 (15)C1—C2—C3—C4−87.0 (14)
Cd1—O1—C1—C2136.8 (8)N1—C2—C3—C431.8 (13)
O2—C1—C2—N1−6.1 (15)C2—C3—C4—C5−39.1 (15)
O1—C1—C2—N1176.4 (9)C3—C4—C5—N129.9 (14)
O2—C1—C2—C3109.1 (12)C2—N1—C5—C4−9.7 (12)
O1—C1—C2—C3−68.3 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O20.892.162.626 (12)112
O1W—H2W···O10.84 (17)2.6 (2)3.175 (19)132
O1W—H2W···Br20.84 (17)2.8 (3)3.311 (19)123
N1—H1A···O1Wiii0.892.052.90 (2)159
N1—H1B···Br1iv0.892.693.416 (11)140
O1W—H1W···Br2v0.88 (16)2.7 (3)3.197 (19)116
  8 in total

1.  Advantages of cocrystallization in the field of solid-state pharmaceutical chemistry: L-Proline and MnCl(2).

Authors:  Anaëlle Tilborg; Catherine Michaux; Bernadette Norberg; Johan Wouters
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Structures from MnX2 and proline: isomorphous racemic compounds and a series of chiral non-isomorphous chain polymers.

Authors:  Kevin Lamberts; Ulli Englert
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2012-11-16

4.  Synthesis, structure, crystal growth and characterization of a novel semiorganic nonlinear optical l-proline lithium bromide monohydrate single crystal.

Authors:  S Sathiskumar; T Balakrishnan; K Ramamurthi; S Thamotharan
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

7.  catena-Poly[[[aqua-(glycine-κO)lithium]-μ-glycine-κ(2) O:O'] bromide].

Authors:  T Balakrishnan; K Ramamurthi; J Jeyakanthan; S Thamotharan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-12-19

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Crystal structure of catena-poly[[[tri-aqua-strontium]-di-μ2-glycinato] dibromide].

Authors:  Palanisamy Revathi; Thangavelu Balakrishnan; Kandasamy Ramamurthi; Subbiah Thamotharan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  Crystal structure of poly[[μ2-di-aqua-di-aqua-μ2-l-proline-κ(2) O:O'-strontium] dibromide].

Authors:  Selladurai Sathiskumar; Thangavelu Balakrishnan; Kandasamy Ramamurthi; Subbiah Thamotharan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-09-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.