Literature DB >> 25875174

Treatment of Bone Loss With the Induced Membrane Technique: Techniques and Outcomes.

Benjamin C Taylor1, Jonathan Hancock, Ryan Zitzke, Joaquin Castaneda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To critically review the outcomes and issues associated with the induced membrane technique in a trauma population.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series, Level IV therapeutic study.
SETTING: Urban Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Sixty-nine patients aged 18 years or older who underwent treatment of bone loss with the induced membrane technique. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent open treatment of their traumatic bone loss with a 2-stage induced membrane technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Bony union rate, as evaluated with radiographic and clinical signs of healing.
RESULTS: Patients in this series averaged 4.4 surgeries, which included initial debridement to definitive fixation. The tibia was the most common site of bone loss, encompassing 50.7% of the series, whereas femoral bone loss was next at 24.6%. Polymethylmethacrylate spacers were in place for a mean of 11.2 weeks (mode of 8 weeks) before bone grafting for an average bony defect volume of 76.6 cm. Union was obtained in 82.6% of patients at a mean of 26.6 weeks after grafting. Mean follow-up for these patients was 23.8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The induced membrane technique is an effective method to obtain bony union when used in the trauma population. However, it is not foolproof, and attention must be paid to the critical subtleties of the procedure. Further investigation is needed to help determine the optimal spacer composition and other technical aspects of the procedure such as timing of the exchange. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25875174     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  11 in total

1.  Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet's technique is performed later.

Authors:  Florelle Gindraux; François Loisel; Michael Bourgeois; Karim Oudina; Martine Melin; Benoit de Billy; Pauline Sergent; Gregoire Leclerc; Hervé Petite; Frederic Auber; Laurent Obert; Isabelle Pluvy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Altering spacer material affects bone regeneration in the Masquelet technique in a rat femoral defect.

Authors:  Sarah McBride-Gagyi; Zacharie Toth; Daniel Kim; Victoria Ip; Emily Evans; John Tracy Watson; Daemeon Nicolaou
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Induced membrane technique using beta-tricalcium phosphate for reconstruction of femoral and tibial segmental bone loss due to infection: technical tips and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Gen Sasaki; Yoshinobu Watanabe; Wataru Miyamoto; Youichi Yasui; Shota Morimoto; Hirotaka Kawano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Vassilis P Giannoudis; Stephan Sehmisch; Animesh Jha; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Antibiotic cement-coated locking plate as a temporary internal fixator for femoral osteomyelitis defects.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Hongri Wu; Jianhua Li; Zhao Xie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Induced membrane technique for the treatment of severe acute tibial bone loss: preliminary experience at medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Mario Ronga; Mario Cherubino; Katia Corona; Alessandro Fagetti; Barbara Bertani; Luigi Valdatta; Redento Mora; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Induced membrane technique for large bone defects: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Heng Sun; Wen-Wen Tsai; Sz-Iuan Shiu; Chih-Hui Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Daemeon Nicolaou; Mark Hake; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Induced Membrane Bone Grafting Technique for Treatment of Large Postinfectious Acetabular Bone Defects.

Authors:  Gerald Joseph Zeng; Wei Sheng Foong; Sheng Xu; Hee Nee Pang
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-02

10.  Management of Infected Bone Defects of the Lower Extremities by Three-Stage Induced Membrane Technique.

Authors:  Chong Zhang; Chunquan Zhu; Guorong Yu; Kai Deng; Li Yu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.