Literature DB >> 31321472

Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet's technique is performed later.

Florelle Gindraux1,2, François Loisel3,4, Michael Bourgeois3, Karim Oudina5, Martine Melin6, Benoit de Billy4,7, Pauline Sergent3, Gregoire Leclerc3, Hervé Petite5, Frederic Auber4,7, Laurent Obert3,4, Isabelle Pluvy3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous clinical studies have shown the effectiveness of bone repair using two-stage surgery called the induced membrane (IM) technique. The optimal wait before the second surgery is said to be 1 month. We have been successfully performing the IM technique while waiting an average of 6 months to carry out the second stage. We hypothesised that the IM maintains its beneficial capabilities, even at a later second stage, and that there is no relation between the speed of bone union and the wait between the first and second stage. We sought to explore the biological properties of 'older' IMs sampled to substantiate our clinical observations.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a critical size defect were treated with the IM technique. In seven of these patients, pieces of the IM were collected 4.2-14.7 months after the first surgery. IM-derived cell phenotype and osteogenic potential were investigated using in vitro studies (n = 4) while IM nature and function were investigated by histology and immunohistochemistry (n = 3).
RESULTS: The median wait before the second surgery was 5.8 months [range 1.2-14.7] and bone healing occurred at 7.6 months [range 2.5-49.9] for 26 patients. IMs aged 4.2-14.7 months contained mesenchymal stromal cells with in vitro osteogenic potential and corresponded to a multipotent tissue with osteogenic and chondrogenic capabilities contributing to osteogenesis over time.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests the IM retains its powerful osteogenic properties over time and that waiting longer between the two surgeries does not delay bone union.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone union; Experimental studies; Induced membrane; Multipotent tissue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31321472     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01184-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  34 in total

1.  [Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft].

Authors:  A C Masquelet; F Fitoussi; T Begue; G P Muller
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.660

2.  Treatment of Bone Loss With the Induced Membrane Technique: Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Benjamin C Taylor; Jonathan Hancock; Ryan Zitzke; Joaquin Castaneda
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  [Induced membrane technique for the reconstruction of bone defects in upper limb. A prospective single center study of nine cases].

Authors:  T Zappaterra; X Ghislandi; A Adam; S Huard; F Gindraux; D Gallinet; D Lepage; P Garbuio; Y Tropet; L Obert
Journal:  Chir Main       Date:  2011-07-16

Review 4.  Masquelet technique: myth or reality? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilaria Morelli; Lorenzo Drago; David A George; Enrico Gallazzi; Sara Scarponi; Carlo L Romanò
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  Regenerative medicine in lower limb reconstruction.

Authors:  Josephine K McEwan; Howard C Tribe; Neal Jacobs; Nicholas Hancock; Amir A Qureshi; Douglas G Dunlop; Richard Oc Oreffo
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is regulated by osteocyte and osteoblast cells in a simplified bone niche.

Authors:  E Birmingham; G L Niebur; P E McHugh; G Shaw; F P Barry; L M McNamara
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.942

7.  Histological characteristics of induced membranes in subcutaneous, intramuscular sites and bone defect.

Authors:  H Liu; G Hu; P Shang; Y Shen; P Nie; L Peng; H Xu
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 8.  [Induced membrane technique in oral & maxillofacial reconstruction].

Authors:  N Zwetyenga; J-C Fricain; E De Mones; F Gindraux
Journal:  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac       Date:  2012-07-25

9.  Management of traumatic tibial diaphyseal bone defect by "induced-membrane technique".

Authors:  Gaurav Gupta; Sohail Ahmad; A H Khan; M K A Sherwani; Abdul Qayyum Khan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Osteoclasts and their precursors are present in the induced-membrane during bone reconstruction using the Masquelet technique.

Authors:  Richard Gouron; Laurent Petit; Cédric Boudot; Isabelle Six; Michel Brazier; Said Kamel; Romuald Mentaverri
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.963

View more
  10 in total

1.  Introduction of a New Surgical Method to Improve Bone Healing in a Large Bone Defect by Replacement of the Induced Membrane by a Human Decellularized Dermis Repopulated with Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in Rat.

Authors:  Maximilian Leiblein; Tobias Kolb; Lion Christian; Katrin Schröder; Ceyhan Yaman; Alexander Schaible; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich; Maren Janko
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Histological analysis of induced membranes in patients whose bone defects were treated with the Masquelet technique to identify factors affecting the vascularity of induced membranes.

Authors:  Takahiro Niikura; Naoe Jimbo; Masato Komatsu; Keisuke Oe; Tomoaki Fukui; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Shinya Hayashi; Takehiko Matsushita; Yoshitada Sakai; Tomoo Itoh; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Induced membrane technique for reconstruction of a 25 cm humerus diaphyseal defect secondary to chronic osteomyelitis in an adolescent.

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Yaokreh; Guy Serge Yapo Kouamé; Thierry-Hervé Odéhouri-Koudou; Ossénou Ouattara
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Masquelet technique in military practice: specificities and future directions for combat-related bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  Laurent Mathieu; Romain Mourtialon; Marjorie Durand; Arnaud de Rousiers; Nicolas de l'Escalopier; Jean-Marc Collombet
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  Is the bioactivity of induced membranes time dependent?

Authors:  Jan Gessmann; Thomas Rosteius; Hinnerk Baecker; Kavitha Sivalingam; Elvira Peter; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Manfred Köller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  General consensus on multimodal functions and validation analysis of perinatal derivatives for regenerative medicine applications.

Authors:  Michela Pozzobon; Stefania D'Agostino; Maria G Roubelakis; Anna Cargnoni; Roberto Gramignoli; Susanne Wolbank; Florelle Gindraux; Sveva Bollini; Halima Kerdjoudj; Mathilde Fenelon; Roberta Di Pietro; Mariangela Basile; Veronika Borutinskaitė; Roberta Piva; Andreina Schoeberlein; Guenther Eissner; Bernd Giebel; Peter Ponsaerts
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-03

Review 7.  Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Daemeon Nicolaou; Mark Hake; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  Applications of Human Amniotic Membrane for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Mathilde Fénelon; Sylvain Catros; Christophe Meyer; Jean-Christophe Fricain; Laurent Obert; Frédéric Auber; Aurélien Louvrier; Florelle Gindraux
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Impact of scaffold granule size use in Masquelet technique on periosteal reaction: a study in rat femur critical size bone defect model.

Authors:  Maximilian Leiblein; Andreas Winkenbach; Elias Koch; Alexander Schaible; Hubert Büchner; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich; Christoph Nau
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  The Induced Membrane Technique-The Filling Matters: Evaluation of Different Forms of Membrane Filling with and without Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells (BMC) in Large Femoral Bone Defects in Rats.

Authors:  René D Verboket; Nicolas Söhling; Myriam Heilani; Charlotte Fremdling; Alexander Schaible; Katrin Schröder; Jan C Brune; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.