Literature DB >> 29424019

Altering spacer material affects bone regeneration in the Masquelet technique in a rat femoral defect.

Sarah McBride-Gagyi1, Zacharie Toth1, Daniel Kim1, Victoria Ip1, Emily Evans1, John Tracy Watson1, Daemeon Nicolaou1.   

Abstract

The Masquelet technique depends on pre-development of a foreign-body membrane to support bone regeneration with grafts over three times larger than the traditional maximum. To date, the procedure has always used spacers made of bone cement, which is the polymer polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), to induce the foreign-body membrane. This study sought to compare (i) morphology, factor expression, and cellularity in membranes formed by PMMA, titanium, and polyvinyl alcohol sponge (PVA) spacers in the Masquelet milieu and (ii) subsequent bone regeneration in the same groups. Ten-week-old, male Sprague-Dawley rats were given an externally stabilized, 6 mm femur defect, and a pre-made spacer of PMMA, titanium, or PVA was implanted. All animals were given 4 weeks to form a membrane, and those receiving an isograft were given 10 weeks post-implantation to union. All samples were scanned with microCT to measure phase 1 and phase 2 bone formation. Membrane samples were processed for histology to measure membrane morphology, cellularity, and expression of the factors BMP2, TGFβ, VEGF, and IL6. PMMA and titanium spacers created almost identical membranes and phase 1 bone. PVA spacers were uniformly infiltrated with tissue and cells and did not form a distinct membrane. There were no quantitative differences in phase 2 bone formation. However, PMMA induced membranes supported functional union in 6 of 7 samples while a majority of titanium and PVA groups failed to achieve the same. Spacer material can alter the membrane enough to disrupt phase 2 bone formation. The membrane's role in bone regeneration is likely more than just as a physical barrier.
© 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; masquelet technique; rat model; segmental bone defect repair

Year:  2018        PMID: 29424019      PMCID: PMC6785358          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  48 in total

Review 1.  The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects.

Authors:  Alain C Masquelet; Thierry Begue
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  The masquelet induced membrane technique with BMP and a synthetic scaffold can heal a rat femoral critical size defect.

Authors:  Per Bosemark; Christina Perdikouri; Mea Pelkonen; Hanna Isaksson; Magnus Tägil
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Managing bone defects.

Authors:  Aaron Nauth; Michael D McKee; Thomas A Einhorn; J Tracy Watson; Ru Li; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Bone and metal: an orthopaedic perspective on osseointegration of metals.

Authors:  Vitali Goriainov; Richard Cook; Jeremy M Latham; Douglas G Dunlop; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Managing large bone defects in children: a systematic review of the 'induced membrane technique'.

Authors:  Ilaria Morelli; Lorenzo Drago; David A George; Delia Romanò; Carlo L Romanò
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  How fibroblasts and giant cells encapsulate implants: considerations in design of glucose sensors.

Authors:  S C Woodward
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Intercalary segmental reconstruction of long bones after malignant bone tumor resection using primary methyl methacrylate cement spacer interposition and secondary bone grafting: the induced membrane technique.

Authors:  Thierry Villemagne; Christian Bonnard; Franck Accadbled; Mohamed L'kaissi; Benoit de Billy; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Induced periosteum a complex cellular scaffold for the treatment of large bone defects.

Authors:  Richard J Cuthbert; Sarah M Churchman; Hiang B Tan; Dennis McGonagle; Elena Jones; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Genomewide molecular and biologic characterization of biomembrane formation adjacent to a methacrylate spacer in the rat femoral segmental defect model.

Authors:  Helen E Gruber; Franklin K Gettys; Harvey E Montijo; James S Starman; Essraa Bayoumi; Kenneth J Nelson; Gretchen L Hoelscher; Warren K Ramp; Natalia Zinchenko; Jane A Ingram; Michael J Bosse; James F Kellam
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Osteogenic, stem cell and molecular characterisation of the human induced membrane from extremity bone defects.

Authors:  H E Gruber; G Ode; G Hoelscher; J Ingram; S Bethea; M J Bosse
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Regenerative Approaches for the Treatment of Large Bone Defects.

Authors:  Alexander Stahl; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Vassilis P Giannoudis; Stephan Sehmisch; Animesh Jha; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  CORR Insights®: The Masquelet Technique: Can Disposable Polypropylene Syringes be an Alternative to Standard PMMA Spacers? A Rat Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Shawn R Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Masquelet Technique: Can Disposable Polypropylene Syringes be an Alternative to Standard PMMA Spacers? A Rat Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Laurent Mathieu; James Charles Murison; Arnaud de Rousiers; Nicolas de l'Escalopier; Didier Lutomski; Jean-Marc Collombet; Marjorie Durand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Evaluation of global gene expression in regenerate tissues during Masquelet treatment.

Authors:  Nishant Gohel; Rafael Senos; Steven A Goldstein; Kurt D Hankenson; Mark E Hake; Andrea I Alford
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Sexual differences in bone porosity, osteocyte density, and extracellular matrix organization due to osteoblastic-specific Bmp2 deficiency in mice.

Authors:  Zacharie Toth; Ashley Ward; Simon Y Tang; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.626

7.  From two stages to one: acceleration of the induced membrane (Masquelet) technique using human acellular dermis for the treatment of non-infectious large bone defects.

Authors:  René Danilo Verboket; Maximilian Leiblein; Maren Janko; Alexander Schaible; Jan Claas Brune; Katrin Schröder; Myriam Heilani; Charlotte Fremdling; Yannic Busche; Tanja Irrle; Ingo Marzi; Christoph Nau; Dirk Henrich
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 8.  Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Daemeon Nicolaou; Mark Hake; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Probing the role of methyl methacrylate release from spacer materials in induced membrane bone healing.

Authors:  Alexander Stahl; Young Bum Park; Sang-Hyun Park; Sien Lin; Chi-Chun Pan; Sungwoo Kim; Yunzhi P Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.102

10.  Comparison between the induced membrane technique and distraction osteogenesis in treating segmental bone defects: An experimental study in a rat model.

Authors:  Zhen Shen; Haixiong Lin; Guoqian Chen; Yan Zhang; Zige Li; Ding Li; Lei Xie; Yue Li; Feng Huang; Ziwei Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.