Literature DB >> 2447672

Prediction of late results following valve replacement in aortic valve stenosis. Seventeen years of follow-up examined with the Cox regression analysis.

O Lund1, M Vaeth.   

Abstract

A total of 122 patients (mean age: 55 years, range 20-75 years) were alive 30 days after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) performed in 1965-73 for aortic valve stenosis (AS). Cold chemical Bretschneider cardioplegia was used in all operations. The maximum follow-up was 17 years, mean 9 years. The 10-year cumulative survival +/- SE was 63 +/- 4%. Twenty-one preoperative clinical, invasive and valve-related variables were entered into a Cox regression analysis. Variables with independent predictive value regarding long-term survival were: Left ventricular failure (regression coefficient: b = 1.078, p less than 0.0002), age (b = 0.749, p less than 0.009), pulse pressure (b = -0.663, p less than 0.02) and cardio-thoracic index (CTI) (b = 0.603, p less than 0.04). Based on these variables, a prognostic index with 16 different risk groups was made. In the "best" group (n = 8), the observed 10-year survival +/- SE was 88 +/- 11%, compared to 13 +/- 12% for the "worst" group (n = 8). Multivariate analysis of complication-free survival showed that the total valve-related complication-rate (VRC) (4.2/100 pat.-yrs) was influenced by valve type (Starr-Edwards ball valves, n = 118, versus Lillehei-Kaster and Smeelof-Cutter valves, n = 4) and CTI. The valve- and heart-related events (VRC together with late myocardial infarctions and pacemaker implantations, 6.5/100 pat.-yrs) depended on CTI and previous myocardial infarction. No predictors of thromboembolism (1.6/100 pat.-yrs) or coumarin-related hemorrhage (1.8/100 pat.-yrs) could be identified.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2447672     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1020250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0171-6425            Impact factor:   1.827


  4 in total

1.  Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Antonio Miceli; Federica Marchi; Francesca Chiaramonti; Mattia Glauber; Marco Solinas
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Francesco Pollari; Giovanni Concistrè; Ferdinand Vogt; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-08

3.  Twenty-two-year experience with aortic valve replacement. Starr-Edwards ball valves versus disc valves.

Authors:  H K Pilegaard; O Lund; T T Nielsen; K Magnussen; M A Knudsen; O K Albrechtsen
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

4.  Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  E Straumann; W Kiowski; I Langer; E Grädel; P Stulz; D Burckhardt; M Pfisterer; F Burkart
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.