Literature DB >> 29604367

Effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) uncompetitive antagonists in a delay discounting paradigm using a concurrent-chains procedure.

Justin R Yates1, Benjamin T Gunkel2, Katherine K Rogers2, Kerry A Breitenstein2, Mallory N Hughes2, Anthony B Johnson2, Sara M Sharpe2.   

Abstract

Impulsive choice is often assessed in rodents using a delay discounting (DD) paradigm in which the delay to a large reinforcer (LR) increases across the session. This procedure allows one to test the effects of pharmacological manipulations within a single session. Because discounting is influenced by sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude (SRM) and sensitivity to delayed reinforcement (SDR), applying quantitative analyses (e.g., fitting hyperbolic function) is important for determining the precise behavioral mechanisms being altered following drug administration. One caveat to this approach is that observing increases in SMR/SDR can be difficult (e.g., most rats choose the LR when its delivery is immediate, whereas some rats may show exclusive preference for the small reinforcer [SR] when a delay on the LR is imposed). We utilized a variant of a concurrent-chains procedure in which rats (n = 8) could not show exclusive preference for either reinforcer, thus allowing one to observe increases/decreases in responding at each delay. The NMDAr antagonists MK-801 (0, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03 mg/kg), ketamine (0, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg), and memantine (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 mg/kg) were administered following baseline training because this receptor has recently been implicated in DD. MK-801 (0.03 mg/kg) decreased SRM and SDR. Memantine (7.5 mg/kg) decreased SRM only. These results show that this variant of the concurrent-chains procedure can be used to study the effects of pharmacological manipulations on distinct aspects of DD.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concurrent-chains; Delay discounting; Impulsive choice; NMDA receptor; Rat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604367      PMCID: PMC6231234          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of different fixed-ratio requirements on delay discounting in rats.

Authors:  Sally L Huskinson; Karen G Anderson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Dopaminergic and glutamatergic regulation of effort- and delay-based decision making.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; Maric T L Tse; Sarvin Ghods-Sharifi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Carlos F Aparicio; Mirari Elcoro; Benigno Alonso-Alvarez
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Pramipexole-induced disruption of behavioral processes fundamental to intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Patrick S Johnson; Jeffrey S Stein; Rochelle R Smits; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of acute and chronic methylphenidate on delay discounting.

Authors:  Jonathan M Slezak; Karen G Anderson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ligands on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting procedure.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Benjamin T Gunkel; Katherine K Rogers; Mallory N Hughes; Nicholas A Prior
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement.

Authors:  J L Evenden; C N Ryan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Learning impairments induced by glutamate blockade using dizocilpine (MK-801) in monkeys.

Authors:  J A Harder; A A Aboobaker; T C Hodgetts; R M Ridley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Enhanced attention and impulsive action following NMDA receptor GluN2B-selective antagonist pretreatment.

Authors:  Guy A Higgins; Leo B Silenieks; Cam MacMillan; Julia Sevo; Fiona D Zeeb; Sandy Thevarkunnel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using a dependent schedule to measure risky choice in male rats: Effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Nicholas A Prior; Marissa R Chitwood; Haley A Day; Jonah R Heidel; Sarah E Hopkins; Brittany T Muncie; Tatiana A Paradella-Bradley; Alexandra P Sestito; Ashley N Vecchiola; Emily E Wells
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  GABAB receptors in prelimbic cortex and basolateral amygdala differentially influence intertemporal decision making and decline with age.

Authors:  Caesar M Hernandez; Joseph A McQuail; Tyler W Ten Eyck; Alexa-Rae Wheeler; Chase C Labiste; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.273

3.  Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Alexis L Ellis; Karson E Evans; Joy L Kappesser; Kadyn M Lilly; Prodiges Mbambu; Tanner G Sutphin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.