| Literature DB >> 25861811 |
Zheng Li1, R Rand Allingham2, Masakazu Nakano3, Liyun Jia4, Yuhong Chen5, Yoko Ikeda6, Baskaran Mani7, Li-Jia Chen8, Changwon Kee9, David F Garway-Heath10, Sarangapani Sripriya11, Nobuo Fuse12, Khaled K Abu-Amero13, Chukai Huang14, Prasanthi Namburi15, Kathryn Burdon16, Shamira A Perera17, Puya Gharahkhani18, Ying Lin19, Morio Ueno6, Mineo Ozaki20, Takanori Mizoguchi21, Subbiah Ramasamy Krishnadas22, Essam A Osman23, Mei Chin Lee24, Anita S Y Chan25, Liza-Sharmini A Tajudin26, Tan Do27, Aurelien Goncalves28, Pascal Reynier29, Hong Zhang30, Rupert Bourne31, David Goh32, David Broadway33, Rahat Husain32, Anil K Negi34, Daniel H Su32, Ching-Lin Ho32, Augusto Azuara Blanco35, Christopher K S Leung8, Tina T Wong17, Azhany Yakub26, Yutao Liu36, Monisha E Nongpiur7, Jong Chul Han9, Do Nhu Hon27, Balekudaru Shantha37, Bowen Zhao4, Jinghong Sang4, NiHong Zhang4, Ryuichi Sato3, Kengo Yoshii38, Songhomita Panda-Jonas39, Allison E Ashley Koch40, Leon W Herndon2, Sayoko E Moroi41, Pratap Challa2, Jia Nee Foo42, Jin-Xin Bei43, Yi-Xin Zeng43, Cameron P Simmons44, Tran Nguyen Bich Chau45, Philomenadin Ferdinamarie Sharmila11, Merwyn Chew24, Blanche Lim24, Pansy O S Tam8, Elaine Chua24, Xiao Yu Ng24, Victor H K Yong24, Yaan Fun Chong24, Wee Yang Meah42, Saravanan Vijayan15, Sohn Seongsoo9, Wang Xu46, Yik Ying Teo47, Jessica N Cooke Bailey48, Jae H Kang49, Jonathan L Haines48, Ching Yu Cheng50, Seang-Mei Saw51, E-Shyong Tai52, Julia E Richards53, Robert Ritch54, Douglas E Gaasterland55, Louis R Pasquale56, Jianjun Liu42, Jost B Jonas39, Dan Milea17, Ronnie George37, Saleh A Al-Obeidan23, Kazuhiko Mori6, Stuart Macgregor18, Alex W Hewitt57, Christopher A Girkin58, Mingzhi Zhang14, Periasamy Sundaresan15, Lingam Vijaya37, David A Mackey59, Tien Yin Wong60, Jamie E Craig61, Xinghuai Sun62, Shigeru Kinoshita6, Janey L Wiggs58, Chiea-Chuen Khor63, Zhenglin Yang64, Chi Pui Pang8, Ningli Wang4, Michael A Hauser65, Kei Tashiro3, Tin Aung66, Eranga N Vithana67.
Abstract
Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), a major cause of blindness worldwide, is a complex disease with a significant genetic contribution. We performed Exome Array (Illumina) analysis on 3504 POAG cases and 9746 controls with replication of the most significant findings in 9173 POAG cases and 26 780 controls across 18 collections of Asian, African and European descent. Apart from confirming strong evidence of association at CDKN2B-AS1 (rs2157719 [G], odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, P = 2.81 × 10(-33)), we observed one SNP showing significant association to POAG (CDC7-TGFBR3 rs1192415, ORG-allele = 1.13, Pmeta = 1.60 × 10(-8)). This particular SNP has previously been shown to be strongly associated with optic disc area and vertical cup-to-disc ratio, which are regarded as glaucoma-related quantitative traits. Our study now extends this by directly implicating it in POAG disease pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861811 PMCID: PMC4459396 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mol Genet ISSN: 0964-6906 Impact factor: 6.150
Sample collections of POAG cases and controls for Stages 1 (discovery) and 2 (replication)
| Collection | Ethnicity | Age of cases | Age of controlsa | Collection comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 850 | 2347 | Singaporean Chinese | 71.6 ± 10.1 | 58.88 ± 9.6 | New recruitment |
| Japan | 923 | 640 | Japanese | 65.3 ± 13.1 | 71.9 ± 5.8 | Previously GWAS in Nakano |
| USA-African-Americans | 590 | 636 | African American | 65.4 ± 12.3 | 54.8 ± 9.8 | New recruitment |
| China-Beijing | 587 | 461 | Northern Chinese | 58.5 ± 12.5 | Population-based controls | New recruitment |
| Hong Kong | 375 | 2962 | Southern Chinese | 62.3 ± 15.3 | Population-based controls | Previously described for replication in Thorleifsson |
| South India | 121 | 716 | Indian | 60.9 ± 12.0 | 51.0 ± 6.5 | New recruitment |
| Vietnam | 58 | 1984 | Vietnamese | 63 ± 7.1 | Population-based controls | New recruitment |
| Total discovery | 3504 | 9746 | 2206 cases are new discovery samples | |||
| Stage 2 replication | ||||||
| Singapore-2 | 520 | 5473 | Singaporean Chinese | 71.1 ± 10 | Population-based controls | New recruitment |
| Japan-2 | 935 | 996 | Japanese | 64.3 ± 14.0 | 57.5 ± 13.9 | |
| USA-Afican-American 2 | 497 | 304 | African-American | 69.1 ± 11.0 | 66.7 ± 13.1 | New recruitment |
| South India-2 | 453 | 2496 | Indian | 62.5 ± 9.9 | 58.9 ± 10.1 | New recruitment |
| Korea | 400 | 454 | Korean | 59.0 ± 11.8 | 40.3 ± 14.1 | New recruitment |
| Saudi Arabia | 236 | 655 | Middle Eastern | 60.8 ± 12.7 | 54.4 ± 11.7 | New recruitment |
| Malaysia | 132 | 2540 | Malay | 65.1 ± 8.2 | 58.7 ± 11.0 | New recruitment |
| China-Beijing 2 | 115 | 251 | Northern Chinese | 54.2 ± 12.4 | 71.53 ± 7.16 | New recruitment |
| UK | 336 | 6090 | European | 71.4 ± 10.8 | Population-based controls | New recruitment |
| China-Shantou | 247 | 289 | Southern Chinese | 52.9 ± 19.4 | 75.7 ± 6.1 | Previously described for replication in Thorleifsson |
| Germany | 56 | 142 | European | 67.9 ± 11.4 | 78.4 ± 8.9 | New recruitment |
| Vietnam-2 | 76 | 245 | Vietnamese | 52.4 ± 17.4 | 51.3 ± 17.8 | New recruitment |
| France | 80 | 75 | European | 75.6 ± 8.5 | 73.5 ± 8.3 | New recruitment |
| China-Shanghai, Chengdu 2 | 181 | 286 | Southern Chinese | 54.7 ± 16.5 | 84.7 ± 11.7 | Previously described in Chen |
| China-Shanghai, Chengdu | 608 | 1005 | Southern Chinese | 49.6 ± 17.0 | 62.9 ± 12.1 | Previously described in Chen |
| USA (NEIGHBOR) | 2170 | 2347 | European descendant | 66.4 | 68 | Previously described in Wiggs |
| USA (GLAUGEN) | 976 | 1140 | European descendant | 63.6 | 65.5 | Previously described in Wiggs |
| Australia (ANZRAG) | 1155 | 1992 | European descendant | 60.5 ± 14.3 | 55.6 ± 14.4 | Previously described in Gharahkhani |
| Total replication | 9173 | 26 780 | 3425 cases are new replication samples | |||
| Total all samples | 12 677 | 36 526 | 5631 cases are new in this report. | |||
aPopulation-based controls are ascertained from large-scale studies and do not have demographic data available. Based on many well-described examples, both by others and us, the frequency of POAG in the general population is uncommon (i.e. <5%). In this regard, the false-negative rate for POAG status in the population-based controls is likely to be low and thus the effect of loss of statistical power is negligible.
Figure 1.Forest plots showing evidence of association between SNPs: (A) CDKN2B-AS1 rs2157719, (B) CDC7/TGFBR3 rs1192415 and (C) FNDC3B rs4894796. The vertical line represents a per-allele odds ratio of 1.00. The oblongs represent point estimates (referring to the per-allele odds ratio), with the height of the oblongs inversely proportional to the standard error of the point estimates. Horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence interval for each point estimate. Meta-analysis of Stages 1 and 2, OR, Pmeta and I2 was labeled on the right-hand side for corresponding analysis. For rs4894796 genotyping, see Supplementary Material, Information for sample collections.
Figure 2.Analysis of FNDC3B, TGFBR3 and CDC7 expression in ocular tissues. (A) The FNDC3B-specific 162 bp and TGFBR3-specific 152 bp amplification product was observed in all analyzed ocular tissues. CDC7-specific 242 bp product was observed in sclera, cornea, trabecular meshwork, retina, optic disc and optic nerve. The ubiquitously expressed gene, ACTB was used as the normalizing control. A no template sample acted as the negative control (NC) to ensure non-contamination of the RT–PCR reaction mix. The variable M denotes molecular-weight marker. (B) Immunoblot of whole cell lysates from NPCE, retinal pigment epithelial (ARPE19) and HTM cells, probed for FNDC3B and β-actin, as a loading control. Positions of the ∼133 and ∼44 kDa forms of FNDC3B are indicated. All ocular cells analyzed expressed the ∼133 kDa protein, while ARPE19 cells expressed a smaller ∼44 kDa isoform of FNDC3B. (C) Immunolocalization of FNDC3B in human eye tissues. Strong immunofluorescence labeling of FNDC3B (green) was seen in the ciliary muscle (CM) (top row). Scale bar: 100 µm. In the trabecular meshwork (TM, middle row), FNDC3B (green) labeling was relatively weaker. Scale bar: 40 µm. FNDC3B positive immunoreactivity was also observed in cornea epithelial (*) and cornea endothelial cells (white arrows) (bottom row). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 100 µm.