Literature DB >> 31765077

Genetic Risk Scores.

Robert P Igo1, Tyler G Kinzy1, Jessica N Cooke Bailey1.   

Abstract

Genome-wide variation data with millions of genetic markers have become commonplace. However, the potential for interpretation and application of these data for clinical assessment of outcomes of interest, and prediction of disease risk, is currently not fully realized. Many common complex diseases now have numerous, well-established risk loci and likely harbor many genetic determinants with effects too small to be detected at genome-wide levels of statistical significance. A simple and intuitive approach for converting genetic data to a predictive measure of disease susceptibility is to aggregate the effects of these loci into a single measure, the genetic risk score. Here, we describe some common methods and software packages for calculating genetic risk scores and polygenic risk scores, with focus on studies of common complex diseases. We review the basic information needed, as well as important considerations for constructing genetic risk scores, including specific requirements for phenotypic and genetic data, and limitations in their application.
© 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; complex diseases; complex traits; disease prediction; genetic risk score; polygenic risk score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31765077      PMCID: PMC6941594          DOI: 10.1002/cphg.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet        ISSN: 1934-8258


  55 in total

1.  Multi-locus models of genetic risk of disease.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Genome-wide association analyses identify new loci influencing intraocular pressure.

Authors:  X Raymond Gao; Hua Huang; Drew R Nannini; Fangda Fan; Heejin Kim
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  A comparison of type 2 diabetes risk allele load between African Americans and European Americans.

Authors:  Jacob M Keaton; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Nicholette D Palmer; Barry I Freedman; Carl D Langefeld; Maggie C Y Ng; Donald W Bowden
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Population differences in genetic risk for age-related macular degeneration and implications for genetic testing.

Authors:  Kylee L Spencer; Kimberly Glenn; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Jonathan L Haines; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

5.  Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores.

Authors:  Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Jian Yang; Hilary K Finucane; Alexander Gusev; Sara Lindström; Stephan Ripke; Giulio Genovese; Po-Ru Loh; Gaurav Bhatia; Ron Do; Tristan Hayeck; Hong-Hee Won; Sekar Kathiresan; Michele Pato; Carlos Pato; Rulla Tamimi; Eli Stahl; Noah Zaitlen; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Gillian Belbin; Eimear E Kenny; Mikkel H Schierup; Philip De Jager; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Steve McCarroll; Mark Daly; Shaun Purcell; Daniel Chasman; Benjamin Neale; Michael Goddard; Peter M Visscher; Peter Kraft; Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants.

Authors:  Lars G Fritsche; Wilmar Igl; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Felix Grassmann; Sebanti Sengupta; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Kathryn P Burdon; Scott J Hebbring; Cindy Wen; Mathias Gorski; Ivana K Kim; David Cho; Donald Zack; Eric Souied; Hendrik P N Scholl; Elisa Bala; Kristine E Lee; David J Hunter; Rebecca J Sardell; Paul Mitchell; Joanna E Merriam; Valentina Cipriani; Joshua D Hoffman; Tina Schick; Yara T E Lechanteur; Robyn H Guymer; Matthew P Johnson; Yingda Jiang; Chloe M Stanton; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Xiaowei Zhan; Alan M Kwong; Alexis Boleda; Matthew Brooks; Linn Gieser; Rinki Ratnapriya; Kari E Branham; Johanna R Foerster; John R Heckenlively; Mohammad I Othman; Brendan J Vote; Helena Hai Liang; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Ian L McAllister; Timothy Isaacs; Janette Hall; Stewart Lake; David A Mackey; Ian J Constable; Jamie E Craig; Terrie E Kitchner; Zhenglin Yang; Zhiguang Su; Hongrong Luo; Daniel Chen; Hong Ouyang; Ken Flagg; Danni Lin; Guanping Mao; Henry Ferreyra; Klaus Stark; Claudia N von Strachwitz; Armin Wolf; Caroline Brandl; Guenther Rudolph; Matthias Olden; Margaux A Morrison; Denise J Morgan; Matthew Schu; Jeeyun Ahn; Giuliana Silvestri; Evangelia E Tsironi; Kyu Hyung Park; Lindsay A Farrer; Anton Orlin; Alexander Brucker; Mingyao Li; Christine A Curcio; Saddek Mohand-Saïd; José-Alain Sahel; Isabelle Audo; Mustapha Benchaboune; Angela J Cree; Christina A Rennie; Srinivas V Goverdhan; Michelle Grunin; Shira Hagbi-Levi; Peter Campochiaro; Nicholas Katsanis; Frank G Holz; Frédéric Blond; Hélène Blanché; Jean-François Deleuze; Robert P Igo; Barbara Truitt; Neal S Peachey; Stacy M Meuer; Chelsea E Myers; Emily L Moore; Ronald Klein; Michael A Hauser; Eric A Postel; Monique D Courtenay; Stephen G Schwartz; Jaclyn L Kovach; William K Scott; Gerald Liew; Ava G Tan; Bamini Gopinath; John C Merriam; R Theodore Smith; Jane C Khan; Humma Shahid; Anthony T Moore; J Allie McGrath; Reneé Laux; Milam A Brantley; Anita Agarwal; Lebriz Ersoy; Albert Caramoy; Thomas Langmann; Nicole T M Saksens; Eiko K de Jong; Carel B Hoyng; Melinda S Cain; Andrea J Richardson; Tammy M Martin; John Blangero; Daniel E Weeks; Bal Dhillon; Cornelia M van Duijn; Kimberly F Doheny; Jane Romm; Caroline C W Klaver; Caroline Hayward; Michael B Gorin; Michael L Klein; Paul N Baird; Anneke I den Hollander; Sascha Fauser; John R W Yates; Rando Allikmets; Jie Jin Wang; Debra A Schaumberg; Barbara E K Klein; Stephanie A Hagstrom; Itay Chowers; Andrew J Lotery; Thierry Léveillard; Kang Zhang; Murray H Brilliant; Alex W Hewitt; Anand Swaroop; Emily Y Chew; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Margaret DeAngelis; Dwight Stambolian; Jonathan L Haines; Sudha K Iyengar; Bernhard H F Weber; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Iris M Heid
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Polygenic Risk Score Is Associated With Intraocular Pressure and Improves Glaucoma Prediction in the UK Biobank Cohort.

Authors:  X Raymond Gao; Hua Huang; Heejin Kim
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Interpretation of genetic association studies: markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers.

Authors:  Johanna Jakobsdottir; Michael B Gorin; Yvette P Conley; Robert E Ferrell; Daniel E Weeks
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  The Application of Genetic Risk Scores in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review.

Authors:  Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Joshua D Hoffman; Rebecca J Sardell; William K Scott; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Jonathan L Haines
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  17 in total

1.  Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses-a general population study.

Authors:  Aino Saarinen; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Jarmo Hietala; Henrik Dobewall; Veikka Lavonius; Olli Raitakari; Mika Kähönen; Elina Sormunen; Terho Lehtimäki; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 2.  Maturation and application of phenome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Shiying Liu; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Performing post-genome-wide association study analysis: overview, challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Yagoub Adam; Chaimae Samtal; Jean-Tristan Brandenburg; Oluwadamilare Falola; Ezekiel Adebiyi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 4.  Stroke and Etiopathogenesis: What Is Known?

Authors:  Tiziana Ciarambino; Pietro Crispino; Erika Mastrolorenzo; Antonello Viceconti; Mauro Giordano
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Interaction of HLA Class II rs9272219 and TMPO rs17028450 (Arg690Cys) Variants Affects Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Susceptibility in an Admixed Mexican Population.

Authors:  Sandra Rosas-Madrigal; María Teresa Villarreal-Molina; José Flores-Rivera; Verónica Rivas-Alonso; Luis Rodrigo Macias-Kauffer; Graciela Ordoñez; María Del Carmen Chima-Galán; Víctor Acuña-Alonzo; Gastón Macín-Pérez; Rodrigo Barquera; Julio Granados; Ricardo Valle-Rios; Teresa Corona; Alessandra Carnevale; Sandra Romero-Hidalgo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Estimating prevalence of human traits among populations from polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Britney E Graham; Brian Plotkin; Louis Muglia; Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.639

7.  Fully exploiting SNP arrays: a systematic review on the tools to extract underlying genomic structure.

Authors:  Laura Balagué-Dobón; Alejandro Cáceres; Juan R González
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Epicardial Adipose Tissue: The Genetics Behind an Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Marker.

Authors:  João Adriano Sousa; Maria Isabel Mendonça; Marco Serrão; Sofia Borges; Eva Henriques; Sónia Freitas; Margarida Tentem; Marina Santos; Pedro Freitas; António Ferreira; Graça Guerra; António Drumond; Roberto Palma Reis
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-03

Review 9.  Molecular Genetics of Glaucoma: Subtype and Ethnicity Considerations.

Authors:  Ryan Zukerman; Alon Harris; Alice Verticchio Vercellin; Brent Siesky; Louis R Pasquale; Thomas A Ciulla
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  Ischemic Stroke Genetics: What Is New and How to Apply It in Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Aleksandra Ekkert; Aleksandra Šliachtenko; Julija Grigaitė; Birutė Burnytė; Algirdas Utkus; Dalius Jatužis
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.