Literature DB >> 29270861

Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting.

Laura Prieto-Borja1, Álvaro Auñón2, Antonio Blanco3, Ricardo Fernández-Roblas1, Ignacio Gadea1, Joaquín García-Cañete3, Raúl Parrón2, Jaime Esteban4.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the usefulness of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large group of patients in a routine setting, we designed a 3-year retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups: those meeting the clinical criteria of PJI and those that did not (control group). Two hundred patients and 276 samples were included. The types of infection were early (n = 44), delayed (n = 53), positive intraoperative cultures (n = 13) and late-acute (n = 8). The culture sensitivities of sonicate fluid, periprosthetic tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid were 69.5, 52.8, 54.8 and 60.2%, respectively. The specificities were 97.6, 90.3, 93.0 and 89.9%, respectively. Sonicate fluid culture of implants was more sensitive than peri-implant tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid for all infection types, though it was especially useful in delayed infection: 91.3% vs. 60.0% (p = 0.0015), 63.2% (p = 0.0005) and 66.7% (p = 0.0001), respectively. When sonicate fluid culture of implants was performed in addition to conventional cultures, the sensitivity increased significantly in total (from 60.2 to 77.1%) and delayed PJI (from 45.1 to 71.7%). On the other hand, for early PJI, sonicate fluid culture of prosthesis was not superior to conventional diagnostic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29270861     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3164-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  33 in total

Review 1.  [Implant-associated infections - Diagnostics].

Authors:  N Renz; M Müller; C Perka; A Trampuz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Kerryl E Piper; Arlen D Hanssen; Douglas R Osmon; Franklin R Cockerill; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Improved detection of infection in hip replacements. A currently underestimated problem.

Authors:  M M Tunney; S Patrick; S P Gorman; J R Nixon; N Anderson; R I Davis; D Hanna; G Ramage
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-07

4.  Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene.

Authors:  M M Tunney; S Patrick; M D Curran; G Ramage; D Hanna; J R Nixon; S P Gorman; R I Davis; N Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Markus Vogt; Michael Leunig; Jürg Wüst; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Meta-analysis of sonication fluid samples from prosthetic components for diagnosis of infection after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zanjing Zhai; Haowei Li; An Qin; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Chuanlong Wu; Huiwu Li; Zhenan Zhu; Xinhua Qu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Time trends in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infections: a multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  N Benito; M Franco; A Ribera; A Soriano; D Rodriguez-Pardo; L Sorlí; G Fresco; M Fernández-Sampedro; M Dolores Del Toro; L Guío; E Sánchez-Rivas; A Bahamonde; M Riera; J Esteban; J M Baraia-Etxaburu; J Martínez-Alvarez; A Jover-Sáenz; C Dueñas; A Ramos; B Sobrino; G Euba; L Morata; C Pigrau; P Coll; I Mur; J Ariza
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Elie F Berbari; Camelia Marculescu; Irene Sia; Brian D Lahr; Arlen D Hanssen; James M Steckelberg; Rachel Gullerud; Douglas R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Implant sonication increases the diagnostic accuracy of infection in patients with delayed, but not early, orthopaedic implant failure.

Authors:  L Puig-Verdié; E Alentorn-Geli; A González-Cuevas; L Sorlí; M Salvadó; A Alier; X Pelfort; M E Portillo; J P Horcajada
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 10.  Prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Aaron J Tande; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tissue sampling is non-inferior in comparison to sonication in orthopedic revision surgery.

Authors:  Theresa Fritsche; Matthias Schnetz; Alexander Klug; Sebastian Fischer; Christian Ruckes; K P Hunfeld; Reinhard Hoffmann; Yves Gramlich
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Petri Bellova; Veronika Knop-Hammad; Matthias Königshausen; Eileen Mempel; Sven Frieler; Jan Gessmann; Thomas A Schildhauer; Hinnerk Baecker
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  An update about molecular biology techniques to detect orthopaedic implant-related infections.

Authors:  Jaime Esteban; Enrique Gómez-Barrena
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Usefulness of a Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections in the Routine Setting.

Authors:  Álvaro Auñón; Ismael Coifman; Antonio Blanco; Joaquín García Cañete; Raúl Parrón-Cambero; Jaime Esteban
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.