Abolfazl Mehranian1, Habib Zaidi2. 1. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland Geneva Neuroscience Centre, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; and Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The joint maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) for emission-based attenuation correction has regained attention since the advent of time-of-flight PET/MR imaging. Recently, we improved the performance of the MLAA algorithm using an MR imaging-constrained gaussian mixture model (GMM). In this study, we compare the performance of our proposed algorithm with standard 4-class MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) implemented on commercial systems. METHODS: Five head and neck (18)F-FDG patients were scanned on PET/MR imaging and PET/CT scanners. Dixon fat and water MR images were registered to CT images. MRAC maps were derived by segmenting the MR images into 4 tissue classes and assigning predefined attenuation coefficients. For MLAA-GMM, MR images were segmented into known tissue classes, including fat, soft tissue, lung, background air, and an unknown MR low-intensity class encompassing cortical bones, air cavities, and metal artifacts. A coregistered bone probability map was also included in the unknown tissue class. Finally, the GMM prior was constrained over known tissue classes of attenuation maps using unimodal gaussians parameterized over a patient population. RESULTS: The results showed that the MLAA-GMM algorithm outperformed the MRAC method by differentiating bones from air gaps and providing more accurate patient-specific attenuation coefficients of soft tissue and lungs. It was found that the MRAC and MLAA-GMM methods resulted in average standardized uptake value errors of -5.4% and -3.5% in the lungs, -7.4% and -5.0% in soft tissues/lesions, and -18.4% and -10.2% in bones, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed MLAA algorithm is promising for accurate derivation of attenuation maps on time-of-flight PET/MR systems.
UNLABELLED: The joint maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) for emission-based attenuation correction has regained attention since the advent of time-of-flight PET/MR imaging. Recently, we improved the performance of the MLAA algorithm using an MR imaging-constrained gaussian mixture model (GMM). In this study, we compare the performance of our proposed algorithm with standard 4-class MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) implemented on commercial systems. METHODS: Five head and neck (18)F-FDG patients were scanned on PET/MR imaging and PET/CT scanners. Dixon fat and water MR images were registered to CT images. MRAC maps were derived by segmenting the MR images into 4 tissue classes and assigning predefined attenuation coefficients. For MLAA-GMM, MR images were segmented into known tissue classes, including fat, soft tissue, lung, background air, and an unknown MR low-intensity class encompassing cortical bones, air cavities, and metal artifacts. A coregistered bone probability map was also included in the unknown tissue class. Finally, the GMM prior was constrained over known tissue classes of attenuation maps using unimodal gaussians parameterized over a patient population. RESULTS: The results showed that the MLAA-GMM algorithm outperformed the MRAC method by differentiating bones from air gaps and providing more accurate patient-specific attenuation coefficients of soft tissue and lungs. It was found that the MRAC and MLAA-GMM methods resulted in average standardized uptake value errors of -5.4% and -3.5% in the lungs, -7.4% and -5.0% in soft tissues/lesions, and -18.4% and -10.2% in bones, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed MLAA algorithm is promising for accurate derivation of attenuation maps on time-of-flight PET/MR systems.
Authors: Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sangtae Ahn; Florian Wiesinger; M Mehdi Khalighi; Craig S Levin; Andrei H Iagaru; Greg Zaharchuk; Martin Huellner; Gaspar Delso Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 9.236