| Literature DB >> 25853660 |
Sarah B White1, Jeane Chen2, Andrew C Gordon3, Kathleen R Harris4, Jodi R Nicolai4, Derek L West5, Andrew C Larson6.
Abstract
Creation of a VX2 tumor model has traditionally required a laparotomy and surgical implantation of tumor fragments. Open surgical procedures are invasive and require long procedure times and recovery that can result in post-operative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to report the results of a percutaneous ultrasound guided method for creation of a VX2 model in rabbit livers. A total of 27 New Zealand white rabbits underwent a percutaneous ultrasound guided approach, where a VX2 tumor fragment was implanted in the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess for tumor growth and necropsy was performed to determine rates of tract seeding and metastatic disease. Ultrasound guided tumor implantation was successful in all 27 rabbits. One rabbit died 2 days following the implantation procedure. Two rabbits had no tumors seen on follow-up imaging. Therefore, tumor development was seen in 24/26 (92%) rabbits. During the follow-up period, tract seeding was seen in 8% of rabbits and 38% had extra-hepatic metastatic disease. Therefore, percutaneous ultrasound guided tumor implantation safely provides reliable tumor growth for establishing hepatic VX2 tumors in a rabbit model with decreased rates of tract seeding, compared to previously reported methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25853660 PMCID: PMC4390313 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Tumor preparation.
(A) Hind limb tumors were placed in a sterile petri dish and sliced into small tumor fragments (3-4mm3). (B) A 17 gauge coaxial introducer has a hollow core (white arrow), with two inner stylets, sharp (black arrow head) and blunt (white arrow head).
Fig 2Ultrasound guided implantation.
(A) Using ultrasound guidance, a 17 gauge coaxial introducer (arrow) is advanced into the liver. The sharp inner stylet is removed and a small tumor fragment (3-4mm3) is placed in the hub of the introducer and pushed with the blunt stylet. (B) Post implantation US image reveals a small focus of hyperechogenicity (arrow) representing the tumor fragment and air.
Fig 3MRI and Gross Pathology.
(A) Axial T2 weighted MRI image demonstrates two T2 hyperintense lesions in the left hepatic lobe (arrow heads). (B) Explanted gross specimen reveals tumors corresponding to the lesions seen on MRI (arrow heads).
Fig 4Histology.
H&E staining was performed confirming tumors within the liver.
Mean tumor growth rates.
| Mean AP diameter (cm) | Mean CC diameter (cm) | Mean ML diameter (cm) | Mean Time of Tumor Growth (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non metastatic disease | 1.21±.54 | 1.07±.55 | 1.31±.66 | 20.2±.6.1 |
| Metastatic disease | 1.33±.52 | 1.02±.39 | 1.36±.43 | 21.0±12.3 |
| All implanted tumors | 1.23±.55 | 1.00±.46 | 1.31±.57 | 20.1±.8.7 |