RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Electropermeabilization involves the application of electrical pulses to increase cell membrane permeability. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the potential to use electroporation-mediated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (E-TACE) approaches to increase liver tumor drug uptake while using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for intraprocedural optimization of these procedures. METHODS: Fourteen VX2 tumors were grown in the left hepatic lobes of 8 rabbits. Two tumors were grown in each of 6 rabbits (1 tumor serving as E-TACE-treated tumor and the other as nonelectroporated control), and solitary larger tumors were grown in 2 rabbits (half of the tumor treated with E-TACE, remaining half serving as control). Each rabbit was selectively catheterized under digital subtraction angiography guidance. Baseline MRI was performed to generate tumor contrast enhancement curves following catheter-directed infusion of gadopentetate dimeglumine to estimate the proper time delay between subsequent bolus infusion of cisplatin and application of electrical pulses (electrodes were used to deliver 8, 100-μs, 1300-V pulses at the selected delay interval postinfusion). Three hours after E-TACE, rabbits were euthanized, and tumors were sectioned for inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy measurements of platinum concentration (serving as reference standard of cisplatin uptake levels). RESULTS: Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy results demonstrated significantly increased cisplatin uptake in E-TACE-treated tumor tissues, increases of 6.0 ± 3.3-fold compared with transcatheter infusion alone (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that our E-TACE approach may significantly increase liver tumor drug uptake after targeted transcatheter infusion. MRI measurements permitted intraprocedural guidance during these catheter-directed E-TACE procedures.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Electropermeabilization involves the application of electrical pulses to increase cell membrane permeability. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the potential to use electroporation-mediated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (E-TACE) approaches to increase liver tumor drug uptake while using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for intraprocedural optimization of these procedures. METHODS: Fourteen VX2 tumors were grown in the left hepatic lobes of 8 rabbits. Two tumors were grown in each of 6 rabbits (1 tumor serving as E-TACE-treated tumor and the other as nonelectroporated control), and solitary larger tumors were grown in 2 rabbits (half of the tumor treated with E-TACE, remaining half serving as control). Each rabbit was selectively catheterized under digital subtraction angiography guidance. Baseline MRI was performed to generate tumor contrast enhancement curves following catheter-directed infusion of gadopentetate dimeglumine to estimate the proper time delay between subsequent bolus infusion of cisplatin and application of electrical pulses (electrodes were used to deliver 8, 100-μs, 1300-V pulses at the selected delay interval postinfusion). Three hours after E-TACE, rabbits were euthanized, and tumors were sectioned for inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy measurements of platinum concentration (serving as reference standard of cisplatin uptake levels). RESULTS: Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy results demonstrated significantly increased cisplatin uptake in E-TACE-treated tumor tissues, increases of 6.0 ± 3.3-fold compared with transcatheter infusion alone (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that our E-TACE approach may significantly increase liver tumor drug uptake after targeted transcatheter infusion. MRI measurements permitted intraprocedural guidance during these catheter-directed E-TACE procedures.
Authors: Yue Zhang; Yang Guo; Ann B Ragin; Robert J Lewandowski; Guang-Yu Yang; Grace M Nijm; Alan V Sahakian; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hersh Chandarana; Tobias K Block; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ruth P Lim; Danny Kim; David J Mossa; James S Babb; Berthold Kiefer; Vivian S Lee Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Yang Guo; Yue Zhang; Grace M Nijm; Alan V Sahakian; Guang-Yu Yang; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yang Guo; Yue Zhang; Rachel Klein; Grace M Nijm; Alan V Sahakian; Reed A Omary; Guang-Yu Yang; Andrew C Larson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-02 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Zhuoli Zhang; Weiguo Li; Daniel Procissi; Patrick Tyler; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Xiaoming Yin; Yang Guo; Weiguo Li; Eugene Huo; Zhuoli Zhang; Jodi Nicolai; Robert A Kleps; Diego Hernando; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yue Zhang; Sarah B White; Jodi R Nicolai; Zhuoli Zhang; Derek L West; Dong-Hyun Kim; A Lee Goodwin; Frank H Miller; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Min Jeong Jeon; Andrew C Gordon; Andrew C Larson; Jin Wook Chung; Young Il Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Sarah B White; Jeane Chen; Andrew C Gordon; Kathleen R Harris; Jodi R Nicolai; Derek L West; Andrew C Larson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mohammad Hjouj; Jacob Lavee; David Last; David Guez; Dianne Daniels; Shirley Sharabi; Boris Rubinsky; Yael Mardor Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 4.379