Literature DB >> 28980173

Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Karen Jong1, Ted Klein1, Philippe E Zimmern2.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate anatomic and functional late-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy (RMS) at a single tertiary-care institution. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of a prospectively collected database on consecutive patients who underwent RMS for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and had 3 year minimum follow-up was performed. Data collected included physical examination, validated questionnaires including Urogenital Distress Inventory, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, and global Quality of Life (QOL). The primary outcome was failure defined as the need for re-operation and/or prolapse recurrence by examination. Those with office follow-up < 36 months underwent structured phone interviews. Between 12/2007 and 2/2012, 56 women underwent RMS. Thirty women had follow-up ≥ 3 years (median 64 (IQR 48-85) months). Mean C-point went from - 2.33 (range 0 to - 5) to - 9.00 (0 to - 12) (p < 0.01), and mean QOL score from 3.93 (0-10) to 1.93 (0-8) (p < 0.01). Two developed recurrent vault prolapse later on at 26 and 34 months, respectively. Four women (13%) required surgery for secondary prolapses, with three for anterior compartment and one for posterior compartment. Sixteen of twenty six were contacted via structured phone interviews, with 14 doing well, one deceased, and one who underwent a secondary posterior compartment prolapse 6 years later at an outside facility. This long-term study indicates durability for RMS in the management of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-term results; Mesh sacrocolpopexy; Pelvic prolapse; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28980173     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0757-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  23 in total

1.  Reduction of moderate-to-large cystocele during urodynamic evaluation using a vaginal gauze pack: 8-year experience.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Gary E Lemack; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel S Elliott; Amy E Krambeck; George K Chow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Prolapse follow-up at 5 years or more: myth or reality?

Authors:  Rubiao Ou; Xian-Jin Xie; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.

Authors:  Michael J Ehlert; Priyanka Gupta; Jonathan Park; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Carolin Eva Hach; Joschka Krude; Andre Reitz; Michael Reiter; Axel Haferkamp; Stephan Buse
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jasmine Tan-Kim; Charles W Nager; Cara L Grimes; Karl M Luber; Emily S Lukacz; Heidi W Brown; Kimberly L Ferrante; Keisha Y Dyer; Anna C Kirby; Shawn A Menefee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; George K Chow; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.369

10.  An evaluation of knot integrity when tied robotically and conventionally.

Authors:  Tyler Muffly; T Chad McCormick; Julianne Dean; Aaron Bonham; Richard F C Hill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Pawel Mach; Cara Kaufold; Peter Rusch; Rainer Kimmig; Paul Buderath
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Vaginal cuff perforation during robotic-assisted mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jacqueline Chavez; Carlos Finsterbusch; Craig Olson; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-29

3.  New "Wrinkle Method" for Intracorporeal Anterior Vaginal Wall Plication during Sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Sa Ra Lee; Ju Hee Kim; Sung Hoon Kim; Hee Dong Chae
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse.

Authors:  Kwang Jin Ko; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Schachar; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

6.  Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Annah Vollstedt; William Meeks; Veronica Triaca
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-08-08

7.  Challenges of Managing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women with Tamoxifen Use.

Authors:  Ethan M Fan; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-04-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.