Literature DB >> 25851551

Safety testing and operational procedures for self-developed radiofrequency coils.

Jens Hoffmann1, Anke Henning1,2, Ioannis A Giapitzakis1, Klaus Scheffler1,3, G Shajan1, Rolf Pohmann1, Nikolai I Avdievich1.   

Abstract

The development of novel radiofrequency (RF) coils for human ultrahigh-field (≥7 T), non-proton and body applications is an active field of research in many MR groups. Any RF coil must meet the strict requirements for safe application on humans with respect to mechanical and electrical safety, as well as the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits. For this purpose, regulations such as the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard for medical electrical equipment, vendor-suggested test specifications for third party coils and custom-developed test procedures exist. However, for higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths in ultrahigh-field MR, the RF fields may become extremely inhomogeneous in biological tissue and the risk of localized areas with elevated power deposition increases, which is usually not considered by existing safety testing and operational procedures. In addition, important aspects, such as risk analysis and comprehensive electrical performance and safety tests, are often neglected. In this article, we describe the guidelines used in our institution for electrical and mechanical safety tests, SAR simulation and verification, risk analysis and operational procedures, including coil documentation, user training and regular quality assurance testing, which help to recognize and eliminate safety issues during coil design and operation. Although the procedure is generally applicable to all field strengths, specific requirements with regard to SAR-related safety and electrical performance at ultrahigh-field are considered. The protocol describes an internal procedure and does not reflect consensus among a large number of research groups, but rather aims to stimulate further discussion related to minimum coil safety standards. Furthermore, it may help other research groups to establish their own procedures.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Numerical Simulations; RF Safety; RF receive coils; RF transmit coils; SAR; Ultrahigh-field

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851551     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  18 in total

1.  First in-vivo human imaging at 10.5T: Imaging the body at 447 MHz.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan He; M Arcan Ertürk; Andrea Grant; Xiaoping Wu; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Gregor Adriany; Eddie J Auerbach; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A rigid, stand-off hybrid dipole, and birdcage coil array for 7 T body imaging.

Authors:  Jan Paška; Martijn A Cloos; Graham C Wiggins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Trap Design and Construction for High-Power Multinuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments.

Authors:  Joseph V Rispoli; Ivan E Dimitrov; Sergey Cheshkov; Craig Malloy; Steven M Wright; Mary P McDougall
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.176

Review 4.  Progress in Imaging the Human Torso at the Ultrahigh Fields of 7 and 10.5 T.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Wireless amplified NMR detector for improved visibility of image contrast in heterogeneous lesions.

Authors:  Xianchun Zeng; Shengqiang Xu; Changyong Cao; Jian Wang; Chunqi Qian
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  In vivo human head MRI at 10.5T: A radiofrequency safety study and preliminary imaging results.

Authors:  Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh; Lance DelaBarre; Russell L Lagore; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Xiaoping Wu; Andrea Grant; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Ergin Atalar; Yigitcan Eryaman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Dual-Tuned Removable Common-Mode Current Trap for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Angel G Enriquez; Jana M Vincent; Joseph V Rispoli
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

8.  7T MR Thermometry technique for validation of system-predicted SAR with a home-built radiofrequency wrist coil.

Authors:  Andrew J Fagan; Paul S Jacobs; Thomas C Hulshizer; Phillip J Rossman; Matthew A Frick; Kimberly K Amrami; Joel P Felmlee
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Volumetric imaging with homogenised excitation and static field at 9.4 T.

Authors:  Desmond H Y Tse; Christopher J Wiggins; Dimo Ivanov; Daniel Brenner; Jens Hoffmann; Christian Mirkes; Gunamony Shajan; Klaus Scheffler; Kâmil Uludağ; Benedikt A Poser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Multiparametric imaging with heterogeneous radiofrequency fields.

Authors:  Martijn A Cloos; Florian Knoll; Tiejun Zhao; Kai T Block; Mary Bruno; Graham C Wiggins; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.