Literature DB >> 26567326

Experience with decision support system and comfort with topic predict clinicians' responses to alerts and reminders.

Nerissa S Bauer1, Aaron E Carroll2, Chandan Saha3, Stephen M Downs4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians at our institution typically respond to about half of the prompts they are given by the clinic's computer decision support system (CDSS). We sought to examine factors associated with clinician response to CDSS prompts as part of a larger, ongoing quality improvement effort to optimize CDSS use.
METHODS: We examined patient, prompt, and clinician characteristics associated with clinician response to decision support prompts from the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system. We asked pediatricians who were nonusers of CHICA to rate decision support topics as "easy" or "not easy" to discuss with patients and their guardians. We analyzed these ratings and data, from July 1, 2009 to January 29, 2013, utilizing a hierarchical regression model, to determine whether factors such as comfort with the prompt topic and the length of the user's experience with CHICA contribute to user response rates.
RESULTS: We examined 414 653 prompts from 22 260 patients. The length of time a clinician had been using CHICA was associated with an increase in their prompt response rate. Clinicians were more likely to respond to topics rated as "easy" to discuss. The position of the prompt on the page, clinician gender, and the patient's age, race/ethnicity, and preferred language were also predictive of prompt response rate.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights several factors associated with clinician prompt response rates that could be generalized to other health information technology applications, including the clinician's length of exposure to the CDSS, the prompt's position on the page, and the clinician's comfort with the prompt topic. Incorporating continuous quality improvement efforts when designing and implementing health information technology may ensure that its use is optimized.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical guidelines; computer-based decision support; pediatrics; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26567326      PMCID: PMC4954632          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  34 in total

1.  The medical home.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  An update on assessing development in the pediatric office: has anything changed after two policy statements?

Authors:  Alma D Guerrero; Nicole Garro; John T Chang; Alice A Kuo
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Use of a computerized decision aid for developmental surveillance and screening: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Tamara M Dugan; Vibha Anand; Chandan Saha; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Targeted screening for pediatric conditions with the CHICA system.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Paul G Biondich; Vibha Anand; Tamara M Dugan; Meena E Sheley; Shawn Z Xu; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Identifying autism in a brief observation.

Authors:  Terisa P Gabrielsen; Megan Farley; Leslie Speer; Michele Villalobos; Courtney N Baker; Judith Miller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Primary care treatment of pediatric psychosocial problems: A study from pediatric research in office settings and ambulatory sentinel practice network.

Authors:  W Gardner; K J Kelleher; R Wasserman; G Childs; P Nutting; H Lillienfeld; K Pajer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Pediatricians' responses to printed clinical reminders: does highlighting prompts improve responsiveness?

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Stephen M Downs; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  The CHICA smoking cessation system.

Authors:  Stephen M Downs; Vivienne Zhu; Vibha Anand; Paul G Biondich; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

9.  Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation: the CHICA system.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Paul G Biondich; Gilbert Liu; Marc Rosenman; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

10.  Understanding why clinicians answer or ignore clinical decision support prompts.

Authors:  A E Carroll; V Anand; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.342

View more
  5 in total

1.  Physician Intervention to Positive Depression Screens Among Adolescents in Primary Care.

Authors:  Matthew C Aalsma; Ashley M Zerr; Dillon J Etter; Fangqian Ouyang; Amy Lewis Gilbert; Rebekah L Williams; James A Hall; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability.

Authors:  Randall W Grout; Erika R Cheng; Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Training community-based treatment providers to implement contingency management for opioid addiction: Time to and frequency of adoption.

Authors:  Sarah A Helseth; Tim Janssen; Kelli Scott; Daniel D Squires; Sara J Becker
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-09-11

4.  Improving Patient-Centered Communication about Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy through Computerized Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Randall W Grout; Jeffrey Buchhalter; Anup D Patel; Amy Brin; Ann A Clark; Mary Holmay; Tyler J Story; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Prevalence of pain reports in pediatric primary care and association with demographics, body mass index, and exam findings: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Randall W Grout; Rachel Thompson-Fleming; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.