Alexej Barg1, Matthias D Wimmer, Martin Wiewiorski, Dieter C Wirtz, Geert I Pagenstert, Victor Valderrabano. 1. Shared authorship: Barg and Wimmer have equally contributed to the article, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, USA, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Osteoarthritis Research Center Basel, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Schmerzklinik Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: About 1% of adults suffer from painful osteoarthritis of the ankle. The current literature contains no information on the percentage of such patients who derive long-term relief of symptoms from conservative treatment. Advanced ankle osteoarthritis can be treated with non-joint-preserving measures, such as total ankle replacement and ankle fusion. METHODS: This review is based on selected relevant publications, guidelines from Germany and abroad, and the authors' personal experience. RESULTS: Before surgery is considered, conservative measures such as physiotherapy and orthopedic aids should be used to the fullest possible extent. No randomized trials have yet been published comparing total ankle replacement with ankle fusion. Total ankle replacement with newer types of prosthesis yields good to very good intermediate-term and long-term results, with mean success rates of up to 90% at 10 years (range, 68-100%). Independent risk factors for the failure of ankle replacement are age over 70 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.84), primary osteoarthritis (OR 7.19), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OR 6.2), and type of prosthesis (e.g., single hydroxyapatite coating: OR 15.04). The average range of motion of the replaced ankle joint is 25° to 30°, with values as high as 60°. CONCLUSION: Total ankle replacement is a good treatment option for complete, end-stage ankle arthritis. It can restore joint function and make the patient mobile with little or no pain. There are, however, many contraindications to be taken into account. There is a need for further studies of the biomechanics of arthritic and replaced ankle joints and for long-term follow-up studies of total ankle replacement.
BACKGROUND: About 1% of adults suffer from painful osteoarthritis of the ankle. The current literature contains no information on the percentage of such patients who derive long-term relief of symptoms from conservative treatment. Advanced ankle osteoarthritis can be treated with non-joint-preserving measures, such as total ankle replacement and ankle fusion. METHODS: This review is based on selected relevant publications, guidelines from Germany and abroad, and the authors' personal experience. RESULTS: Before surgery is considered, conservative measures such as physiotherapy and orthopedic aids should be used to the fullest possible extent. No randomized trials have yet been published comparing total ankle replacement with ankle fusion. Total ankle replacement with newer types of prosthesis yields good to very good intermediate-term and long-term results, with mean success rates of up to 90% at 10 years (range, 68-100%). Independent risk factors for the failure of ankle replacement are age over 70 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.84), primary osteoarthritis (OR 7.19), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OR 6.2), and type of prosthesis (e.g., single hydroxyapatite coating: OR 15.04). The average range of motion of the replaced ankle joint is 25° to 30°, with values as high as 60°. CONCLUSION: Total ankle replacement is a good treatment option for complete, end-stage ankle arthritis. It can restore joint function and make the patient mobile with little or no pain. There are, however, many contraindications to be taken into account. There is a need for further studies of the biomechanics of arthritic and replaced ankle joints and for long-term follow-up studies of total ankle replacement.
Authors: Sandro Giannini; Matteo Romagnoli; John J O'Connor; Fabio Catani; Livio Nogarin; Bruno Magnan; Francesco Malerba; Leo Massari; Marco Guelfi; Luigi Milano; Antonio Volpe; Arturo Rebeccato; Alberto Leardini Journal: J Foot Ankle Surg Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: F Cenni; A Leardini; M Pieri; L Berti; C Belvedere; M Romagnoli; S Giannini Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Victor Valderrabano; Geert I Pagenstert; Andreas M Müller; Jochen Paul; Heath B Henninger; Alexej Barg Journal: Foot Ankle Clin Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 1.653
Authors: C Stadler; M Stöbich; B Ruhs; C Kaufmann; L Pisecky; S Stevoska; T Gotterbarm; M C Klotz Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Yves Gramlich; Oliver Neun; Alexander Klug; Johannes Buckup; Thomas Stein; Arvid Neumann; Sebastian Fischer; Hans-Peter Abt; Reinhard Hoffmann Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.075