Literature DB >> 34086075

Intermediate to long-term clinical outcomes and survival analysis of the Salto Mobile Bearing total ankle prothesis.

C Stadler1, M Stöbich2, B Ruhs3, C Kaufmann4, L Pisecky5, S Stevoska5, T Gotterbarm5, M C Klotz5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis of the ankle is a major burden to affected patients. While tibio-talar arthrodesis has been the gold-standard regarding the treatment of osteoarthritis of the ankle joint for many years, at present total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) provides appealing clinical outcomes and is continually gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intermediate- to long-term clinical outcome including the survival rate of Salto Mobile Bearing TAA (Tonier SA, Saint Ismier, France).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study intermediate- to long-term outcomes measures [Ankle Range of Motion (ROM), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS score) and survival rate] of 171 consecutive TAA were analysed and compared before and after surgery. Revision was defined as secondary surgery with prothesis component removal, while reoperation was defined as a non-revisional secondary surgery involving the ankle.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up (FU) period of 7.2 ± 2.7 years (range 2.0 to 14.1 years) there was a significant improvement in ankle ROM (total ROM improved from 25.0° ± 15.0° to 28.7° ± 11.3°, p = 0.015; plantarflexion improved from 18.4° ± 11.7° to 20.6° ± 8.2°, p = 0.044; dorsiflexion improved from 6.6° ± 5.7° to 8.1° ± 4.9°, p = 0.011). AOFAS score increased significantly by 41 ± 15 points after surgery (43.3 ± 11.1 before and 84.3 ± 12.0 after surgery, p < 0.001). Overall survival rate within the FU was 81.3% (95% CI 75.3% to 87.3%) with any secondary surgery, 89.9% (95% CI 84.1% to 93.6%) with revision and 93.6% (95% CI 89.8% to 97.3%) with reoperation as endpoint.
CONCLUSION: This study endorses the previously reported appealing intermediate- to long-term outcomes of the Salto Mobile Bearing TAA. There was a significant increase in ROM and AOFAS score as well as decent implant survival at final FU.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle arthritis; Joint replacement; Salto; Total ankle arthroplasty; Total ankle replacement

Year:  2021        PMID: 34086075     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03946-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  32 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Dawson C Muir; Annunziato Amendola; Charles L Saltzman
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 2.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  A brief history of total ankle replacement and a review of the current status.

Authors:  John A Vickerstaff; Anthony W Miles; James L Cunningham
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Outcome after total ankle arthroplasty with a minimum of five years follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Kevin Phan; Benjamin Hickey; Michael Galvin; Harvinder Bedi
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.705

5.  Sports Participation, Functional Outcome, and Complications After Ankle Arthrodesis: Midterm Follow-up.

Authors:  Yvonne R A Kerkhoff; Noël L W Keijsers; Jan Willem K Louwerens
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  History of total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gougoulias; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.231

7.  Functional limitations of patients with end-stage ankle arthrosis.

Authors:  Julie Agel; J Chris Coetzee; Bruce J Sangeorzan; Matthew M Roberts; Sigvard T Hansen
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Comparison of Three Total Ankle Replacement Systems Done at a Single Facility.

Authors:  J Chris Coetzee; Daryle Petersen; Rebecca M Stone
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2016-09-20

9.  Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis: a comparative analysis of arc of movement and functional outcomes.

Authors:  D I Pedowitz; J M Kane; G M Smith; H L Saffel; C Comer; S M Raikin
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Outcome after 52 Salto Ankle Prostheses Implanted by a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Frank W M Faber; Monique J L Mastboom; Sabine T van Vliet-Koppert; Ilse C E Bouman; Paulien M van Kampen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-08-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Does Concurrent Distal Tibiofibular Joint Arthrodesis Affect the Nonunion and Complication Rates of Tibiotalar Arthrodesis?

Authors:  Carsten Schlickewei; Julie A Neumann; Sinef Yarar-Schlickewei; Helge Riepenhof; Victor Valderrabano; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Alexej Barg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Arthrodesis and Defect Bridging of the Upper Ankle Joint with Allograft Bone Chips and Allograft Cortical Bone Screws (Shark Screw®) after Removal of the Salto-Prosthesis in a Multimorbidity Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Klaus Pastl; Eva Pastl; Daniel Flöry; Gudrun H Borchert; Michel Chraim
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.