Literature DB >> 21840736

Early clinical results of the BOX ankle replacement are satisfactory: a multicenter feasibility study of 158 ankles.

Sandro Giannini1, Matteo Romagnoli, John J O'Connor, Fabio Catani, Livio Nogarin, Bruno Magnan, Francesco Malerba, Leo Massari, Marco Guelfi, Luigi Milano, Antonio Volpe, Arturo Rebeccato, Alberto Leardini.   

Abstract

A new design for a 3-part ankle replacement was developed in an effort to achieve compatibility with the naturally occurring ligaments of the ankle by allowing certain fibers to remain isometric during passive motion. In order to test the design concept clinically, 158 prostheses were implanted in 156 patients within a 9-center trial and were followed up for a mean of 17 (range 6 to 48) months. The mean age at the time of surgery was 60.5 (range 29.7 to 82.5) years. Outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Surgery hindfoot-ankle score and range of motion measured on lateral radiographs of the ankle. The preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Surgery score of 36.3 rose to 74.6, 78.6, 76.4, and 79.0, respectively, at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. A significant correlation between meniscal bearing movement on the tibial component (mean 3.3 mm; range 2 to 11 mm) and range of flexion at the replaced ankle (mean 26.5°; range 14° to 53°) was observed in radiograms at extreme flexions. Two (1.3%) revisions in the second and third postoperative years necessitated component removal (neither were for implant failure), and 7 (4.4%) further secondary operations were required. The results of this investigation demonstrated that non-anatomic-shaped talar and tibial components, with a fully conforming interposed meniscal bearing, can provide safety and efficacy in the short term, although a longer follow-up period is required to more thoroughly evaluate this ankle implant.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840736     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  7 in total

Review 1.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Long-term follow-up of Bologna-Oxford (BOX) total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alberto Bianchi; Nicolò Martinelli; Eleonora Caboni; Giorgio Raggi; Francesca Manfroni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Bologna-Oxford ankle replacement: a case series of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Najefi; Karan Malhotra; Oliver Chan; Nicholas Cullen; Andy Goldberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Validity and reliability of ankle morphological measurements on computerized tomography-synthesized planar radiographs.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Kuo; Hsuan-Lun Lu; Tung-Wu Lu; Alberto Leardini; Mei-Ying Kuo; Horng-Chaung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antonio Mazzotti; Alberto Arceri; Simone Zielli; Simone Bonelli; Valentina Viglione; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18

6.  A new ligament-compatible patient-specific 3D-printed implant and instrumentation for total ankle arthroplasty: from biomechanical studies to clinical cases.

Authors:  C Faldini; A Mazzotti; C Belvedere; G Durastanti; A Panciera; G Geraci; A Leardini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-02

7.  The Infinity Total Ankle System: Early Clinical Results With 2- to 4-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Murray Penner; W Hodges Davis; Kevin Wing; Thomas Bemenderfer; Feras Waly; Robert B Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2018-06-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.