Sebastian Fischer1, Alexander Klug2, Philipp Faul2, Reinhard Hoffmann2, Sebastian Manegold3, Yves Gramlich2. 1. Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany. dr.sebastian.fischer@me.com. 2. Department for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany. 3. Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of end-stage posttraumatic upper ankle arthrosis is challenging. Highly variable revision rates have been reported with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) of the upper ankle joint. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare revision rates with tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA) and TAA with a prosthesis to determine the superior treatment approach. METHODS: Data for 148 patients (96 males and 52 females) with end-stage posttraumatic upper ankle arthrosis-including 88 treated with TTA and 60 with TAA between 2008 and 2013, with a mean follow-up of 59 months-were analysed. Bone fusion was confirmed by x-ray radiography and computed tomography. RESULTS: The overall revision rate was 28%; the rate was higher with TAA (42%) than with TTA (18%). The TAA group showed an increase in revisions from 12- to 24-month postsurgery. The most common cause of revision in the TAA group was cysts (20%), and the most frequent reason for revision was nonunion (8%). Mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Foot and Ankle Outcome (FAO) scores in all patients were 55.5 and 53.1, respectively, with no significant difference between the TTA and TAA groups (p > 0.05). In nine cases (15%) the prosthesis was explanted or converted to TTA. TAA patients who underwent conversion to TTA had worse outcomes (AOFAS score = 39; FAO score = 35.29). CONCLUSION: TAA is associated with a high rate of revisions, especially from the 2nd year postsurgery. Therefore, TTA is the treatment of choice for end-stage posttraumatic upper ankle arthrosis. Level of evidence Level III, comparative series.
PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of end-stage posttraumatic upper ankle arthrosis is challenging. Highly variable revision rates have been reported with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) of the upper ankle joint. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare revision rates with tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA) and TAA with a prosthesis to determine the superior treatment approach. METHODS: Data for 148 patients (96 males and 52 females) with end-stage posttraumatic upper ankle arthrosis-including 88 treated with TTA and 60 with TAA between 2008 and 2013, with a mean follow-up of 59 months-were analysed. Bone fusion was confirmed by x-ray radiography and computed tomography. RESULTS: The overall revision rate was 28%; the rate was higher with TAA (42%) than with TTA (18%). The TAA group showed an increase in revisions from 12- to 24-month postsurgery. The most common cause of revision in the TAA group was cysts (20%), and the most frequent reason for revision was nonunion (8%). Mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Foot and Ankle Outcome (FAO) scores in all patients were 55.5 and 53.1, respectively, with no significant difference between the TTA and TAA groups (p > 0.05). In nine cases (15%) the prosthesis was explanted or converted to TTA. TAA patients who underwent conversion to TTA had worse outcomes (AOFAS score = 39; FAO score = 35.29). CONCLUSION: TAA is associated with a high rate of revisions, especially from the 2nd year postsurgery. Therefore, TTA is the treatment of choice for end-stage posttraumatic upper ankle arthrosis. Level of evidence Level III, comparative series.
Authors: Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Kerry Tai; Christopher Vannabouathong; Sohail M Mulla; Christina L Goldstein; Christopher Smith; Brendan Sales; Darryl Yeardley; Mohit Bhandari; Bradley A Petrisor Journal: J Foot Ankle Surg Date: 2020 Mar - Apr Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: Charles L Saltzman; Michael L Salamon; G Michael Blanchard; Thomas Huff; Andrea Hayes; Joseph A Buckwalter; Annunziato Amendola Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2005
Authors: Jeremy LaMothe; Josh R Baxter; Susannah Gilbert; Conor I Murphy; Sydney C Karnovsky; Mark C Drakos Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Hyun Jung Kim; Dong Hun Suh; Jae Hyuk Yang; Jin Woo Lee; Hak Jun Kim; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Seung Woo Han; Gi Won Choi Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.075