Literature DB >> 2583629

[Evaluation of the applicability of a mathematical model in the x-ray cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal bite anomalies. A clinical test].

S Järvinen.   

Abstract

The mathematical model (Järvinen) for measuring the sagittal difference between the maxillary and mandibular apical bases has been clinically tested. The material for this study consisted of 30 lateral skull radiographs of orthodontically untreated children (aged seven to 15 years) with different types of skeletal and/or dento-alveolar malocclusions. A comparison of the model with two conventional and two more developed methods to measure the sagittal apical base difference showed that the correlation between the new and the older methods increased as the errors of the older methods were eliminated. The results seemed to indicate that sagittal malocclusions could be accurately diagnosed by means of the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2583629     DOI: 10.1007/bf02171181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  21 in total

1.  Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.

Authors:  H P Chang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Linear evaluation of the development of sagittal jaw relationship.

Authors:  S Williams; B C Leighton; J H Nielsen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-09

4.  An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-02

5.  [Tensor analysis in orthodontic x-ray cephalometric diagnosis. A further development of the methods].

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl       Date:  1987

6.  The JYD angle: a modified method of establishing sagittal apical base relationship.

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle.

Authors:  S Rotberg; N Fried; J Kane; E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-06

8.  Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.

Authors:  W Hussels; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-05

9.  Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications.

Authors:  S E Bishara; J A Fahl; L C Peterson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-08

10.  A method of cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.