Literature DB >> 3855607

An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.

S Järvinen.   

Abstract

The variation of the ANB angle was studied in a sample which consisted of 138 orthodontically untreated children 7 to 15 years of age with Class I, Class II, or Class III (Angle) malocclusion. A regression analysis was used in order to describe the proportion of the distorting variation caused by some usual changes in the cranial and facial skeleton. The results revealed that a part of the variation of the ANB angle could be attributed to factors other than the actual apical base difference, among these factors being the rotation of the S-N plane, the relative length of the S-N plane, and the rotation of the jaws. Because the ANB angle can vary without any marked abnormalities in the sagittal jaw relationship, the use of the so-called normal limits for the ANB angle is not justified. It would be better to replace the ANB angle with a more accurate indicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3855607     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  10 in total

1.  Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Björn Ludwig; Julia Spindler; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  P Aparna; Dilip N Kumar; Mandav Prasad; Naveen Shamnur; Arun Kumar G; Sridhar K R; Gopal Krishna B R; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  [Effects of activators in class II division 1 therapy].

Authors:  M Ulgen; G P Schmuth
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1987-02

4.  [Positional and morphologic relations of the facial skeleton].

Authors:  M Arat; F Gürbüz; Z Bayazit; B Berksü
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1988-12

5.  [Evaluation of the applicability of a mathematical model in the x-ray cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal bite anomalies. A clinical test].

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1989-10

6.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparing the range of μ and β angles in 6-17-year-old children of Isfahan with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Saeed Sadeghian; Maryam Hajiahmadi; Ladan Khorrami; Hadi Moshkelgosha
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

8.  Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?

Authors:  Shipra Nagar; Rohit Nagar; Pradeep Raghav
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

9.  Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perinetti; Michele Ceschi; Alessandro Scalia; Luca Contardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy.

Authors:  Luciana Abrao Malta; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; Kurt Faltin; James A McNamara
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.