Literature DB >> 6930164

Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle.

S Rotberg, N Fried, J Kane, E Shapiro.   

Abstract

The ANB and "Wits" values of fifty patients were correlated to see how accurately one can predict the "Wits" value, given the ANB measurement. There is no correlation between these two values when the "Wits" measurement is negative. In our study, when the positive ANB measurement was less than 4 degrees, the "Wits" values could be either positive or negative. When the ANB angle was between 4 and 8 degrees, all "Wits" values were positive. When both the "Wits values were positive and the ANB values ranged between 1 and 8 degrees, we could predict the "Wits" measurement with a 38 percent accuracy. If the ANB range was narrowed to 4 to 8 degrees, all "Wits" values were positive and we could predict them 28 percent of the time. Both these figures are statistically significant but clinically irrelevant. Further studies are needed to determine the exact nature of these interrelationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6930164     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  10 in total

1.  [Positional and morphologic relations of the facial skeleton].

Authors:  M Arat; F Gürbüz; Z Bayazit; B Berksü
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1988-12

2.  [Evaluation of the applicability of a mathematical model in the x-ray cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal bite anomalies. A clinical test].

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1989-10

3.  Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes.

Authors:  Anahit Lewandowska; Katarzyna Mańka-Malara; Jolanta Kostrzewa-Janicka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Influence of diabetes mellitus on the development and treatment of malocclusions--a case report with literature review.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; James Deschner; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Comparison of different parameters for recording sagittal maxillo mandibular relation using natural head posture: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar Singh; Sanjay V Ganeshkar; Praveen Mehrotra; Jitendra Bhagchandani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2013-01

6.  Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?

Authors:  Shipra Nagar; Rohit Nagar; Pradeep Raghav
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

7.  Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perinetti; Michele Ceschi; Alessandro Scalia; Luca Contardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Facial analysis using a new clinical device: The Kattan Facio-meter.

Authors:  Ehab S El Kattan; Omnia A Elhiny; Mohamed E El Kattan; Aya E El Kattan; Amira Elsheikh
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-01-01

9.  Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Authors:  Natalia Zamora; Rosa Cibrián; Jose-Luis Gandia; Vanessa Paredes
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-07-01

10.  Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Irfan Qamaruddin; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Fazal Shahid; Sadaf Tanveer; Marvee Umer; Erum Amin
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.