A Wihlborg1, M Englund, K Åkesson, P Gerdhem. 1. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Orthopedics, K54, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden, axel.wihlborg@karolinska.se.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: In a large cohort of elderly women followed for 10 years, we found that balance, gait speed, and self-reported history of fall independently predicted fracture. These clinical risk factors are easily evaluated and therefore advantageous in a clinical setting. They would improve fracture risk assessment and thereby also fracture prevention. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify additional risk factors for osteoporosis-related fracture by investigating the fracture predictive ability of physical performance tests and self-reported history of falls. METHODS: In the population-based Osteoporosis Prospective Risk Assessment study (OPRA), 1044 women were recruited at the age of 75 and followed for 10 years. At inclusion, knee extension force, standing balance, gait speed, and bone mineral density (BMD) were examined. Falls the year before investigation was assessed by questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine fracture hazard ratios (HR) with BMD, history of fracture, BMI, smoking habits, bisphosphonate, vitamin D, glucocorticoid, and alcohol use as covariates. Continuous variables were standardized and HR shown for each standard deviation change. RESULTS: Of all women, 427 (41%) sustained at least one fracture during the 10-year follow-up. Failing the balance test had an HR of 1.98 (1.18-3.32) for hip fracture. Each standard deviation decrease in gait speed was associated with an HR of 1.37 (1.14-1.64) for hip fracture. Previous fall had an HR of 1.30 (1.03-1.65) for any fracture; 1.39 (1.08-1.79) for any osteoporosis-related fracture; and 1.60 (1.03-2.48) for distal forearm fracture. Knee extension force did not show fracture predictability. CONCLUSION: The balance test, gait speed test, and self-reported history of fall all hold independent fracture predictability. Consideration of these clinical risk factors for fracture would improve the fracture risk assessment and subsequently also fracture prevention.
UNLABELLED: In a large cohort of elderly women followed for 10 years, we found that balance, gait speed, and self-reported history of fall independently predicted fracture. These clinical risk factors are easily evaluated and therefore advantageous in a clinical setting. They would improve fracture risk assessment and thereby also fracture prevention. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify additional risk factors for osteoporosis-related fracture by investigating the fracture predictive ability of physical performance tests and self-reported history of falls. METHODS: In the population-based Osteoporosis Prospective Risk Assessment study (OPRA), 1044 women were recruited at the age of 75 and followed for 10 years. At inclusion, knee extension force, standing balance, gait speed, and bone mineral density (BMD) were examined. Falls the year before investigation was assessed by questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine fracture hazard ratios (HR) with BMD, history of fracture, BMI, smoking habits, bisphosphonate, vitamin D, glucocorticoid, and alcohol use as covariates. Continuous variables were standardized and HR shown for each standard deviation change. RESULTS: Of all women, 427 (41%) sustained at least one fracture during the 10-year follow-up. Failing the balance test had an HR of 1.98 (1.18-3.32) for hip fracture. Each standard deviation decrease in gait speed was associated with an HR of 1.37 (1.14-1.64) for hip fracture. Previous fall had an HR of 1.30 (1.03-1.65) for any fracture; 1.39 (1.08-1.79) for any osteoporosis-related fracture; and 1.60 (1.03-2.48) for distal forearm fracture. Knee extension force did not show fracture predictability. CONCLUSION: The balance test, gait speed test, and self-reported history of fall all hold independent fracture predictability. Consideration of these clinical risk factors for fracture would improve the fracture risk assessment and subsequently also fracture prevention.
Authors: John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Fredrik Borgström; Oskar Ström; Eugene McCloskey Journal: Bone Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Didier B Hans; John A Kanis; Sanford Baim; John P Bilezikian; Neil Binkley; Jane A Cauley; Juliet E Compston; Cyrus Cooper; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; William D Leslie; E Michael Lewiecki; Marjorie M Luckey; Eugene V McCloskey; Socrates E Papapoulos; Catalina Poiana; René Rizzoli Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2011 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Stacey A Wainwright; Lynn M Marshall; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis M Black; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Molly T Vogt; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Nguyen D Nguyen; Chatlert Pongchaiyakul; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-05-31 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sarah D Berry; Andrew R Zullo; Yoojin Lee; Vincent Mor; Kevin W McConeghy; Geetanjoli Banerjee; Ralph B D'Agostino; Lori Daiello; David Dosa; Douglas P Kiel Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kamil E Barbour; Li-Yung Lui; Charles E McCulloch; Kristine E Ensrud; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine Yaffe; Deborah E Barnes; Lisa Fredman; Anne B Newman; Steven R Cummings; Jane A Cauley Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Allison M Gustavson; Jason R Falvey; Jeri E Forster; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: J Geriatr Phys Ther Date: 2019 Jul/Sep Impact factor: 3.381
Authors: R Asahi; Y Nakamura; M Kanai; K Watanabe; S Yuguchi; T Kamo; M Azami; H Ogihara; S Asano Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Dima Alajlouni; Thach Tran; Dana Bliuc; Robert D Blank; Peggy M Cawthon; Eric S Orwoll; Jacqueline R Center Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: N C Wright; E R Hooker; C M Nielson; K E Ensrud; S L Harrison; E S Orwoll; E Barrett-Connor Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.507