Kamil E Barbour1, Li-Yung Lui2, Charles E McCulloch3, Kristine E Ensrud4, Peggy M Cawthon2, Kristine Yaffe3, Deborah E Barnes3, Lisa Fredman5, Anne B Newman6, Steven R Cummings2, Jane A Cauley6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. iyk1@cdc.gov. 2. California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. 4. University of Minnesota and Minneapolis VAHS. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have only considered one measurement of physical performance in its relationship to fractures and mortality. A single measurement is susceptible to large within-person changes over time, and thus, may not capture the true association between physical performance and the outcomes of interest. METHODS: Using data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, we followed 7,015 women enrolled prior to age 80 years who had outcome information beyond this age. Trajectories of walking speed (m/s) and chair stand speed (stands/s) were estimated up to the last visit prior to age 80 years using mixed-effects linear regression. Physical performance at age 80 (PF_age80) was assessed at the last visit prior to age 80 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression and multivariate models adjusted for all other covariates. RESULTS: Greatest walking speed decline and chair stand speed decline were both associated with higher risk of hip fracture (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.58 and HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.54, respectively), but not nonspine fractures. Greatest walking speed decline and chair stand speed decline were both associated with a significant 29% (95% CI: 17-42%) and 27% (95% CI: 15-39%) increased risk of mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Greatest declines in walking speed and chair stand speed were both associated with an increased risk of hip fracture and mortality independent of PF_age80 and other important confounders. Both physical performance change and the single physical performance measurement should be considered in the etiology of hip fracture and mortality.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have only considered one measurement of physical performance in its relationship to fractures and mortality. A single measurement is susceptible to large within-person changes over time, and thus, may not capture the true association between physical performance and the outcomes of interest. METHODS: Using data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, we followed 7,015 women enrolled prior to age 80 years who had outcome information beyond this age. Trajectories of walking speed (m/s) and chair stand speed (stands/s) were estimated up to the last visit prior to age 80 years using mixed-effects linear regression. Physical performance at age 80 (PF_age80) was assessed at the last visit prior to age 80 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression and multivariate models adjusted for all other covariates. RESULTS: Greatest walking speed decline and chair stand speed decline were both associated with higher risk of hip fracture (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.58 and HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.54, respectively), but not nonspine fractures. Greatest walking speed decline and chair stand speed decline were both associated with a significant 29% (95% CI: 17-42%) and 27% (95% CI: 15-39%) increased risk of mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Greatest declines in walking speed and chair stand speed were both associated with an increased risk of hip fracture and mortality independent of PF_age80 and other important confounders. Both physical performance change and the single physical performance measurement should be considered in the etiology of hip fracture and mortality.
Authors: John T Chang; Sally C Morton; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Walter A Mojica; Margaret Maglione; Marika J Suttorp; Elizabeth A Roth; Paul G Shekelle Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-03-20
Authors: Peggy M Cawthon; Terri L Blackwell; Lynn M Marshall; Howard A Fink; Deborah M Kado; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis Black; Eric S Orwoll; Steven R Cummings; John T Schousboe Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger Journal: JAMA Date: 1990-02-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cora E Lewis; Susan K Ewing; Brent C Taylor; James M Shikany; Howard A Fink; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Steven R Cummings; Eric Orwoll Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: K E Ensrud; L Palermo; D M Black; J Cauley; M Jergas; E S Orwoll; M C Nevitt; K M Fox; S R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Dawn C Mackey; Li-Yung Lui; Peggy M Cawthon; Douglas C Bauer; Michael C Nevitt; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Cora E Lewis; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Steven R Cummings Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-11-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Zhao Chen; Charles Kooperberg; Mary B Pettinger; Tamsen Bassford; Jane A Cauley; Andrea Z LaCroix; Cora E Lewis; Simon Kipersztok; Carolyn Borne; Rebecca D Jackson Journal: Menopause Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Lesley D Gillespie; M Clare Robertson; William J Gillespie; Catherine Sherrington; Simon Gates; Lindy M Clemson; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-09-12
Authors: Kamil E Barbour; Naoko Sagawa; Robert M Boudreau; Mary E Winger; Jane A Cauley; Michael C Nevitt; Tomoko Fujii; Kushang V Patel; Elsa S Strotmeyer Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Kathleen M Hovey; Katie L Stone; Chris A Andrews; Kamil E Barbour; Lauren Hale; Rebecca D Jackson; Karen C Johnson; Erin S LeBlanc; Wenjun Li; Oleg Zaslavsky; Heather Ochs-Balcom; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Carolyn J Crandall Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Joseph Larson; Jane A Cauley; John T Schousboe; Andrea Z LaCroix; John A Robbins; Nelson B Watts; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: JBMR Plus Date: 2019-11-30
Authors: Rod L Walker; Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman; John Bellettiere; Andrea Z LaCroix; David Wing; Michael Higgins; KatieRose Richmire; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane; Dori E Rosenberg Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Peggy M Cawthon; Neeta Parimi; Lisa Langsetmo; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Steven R Cummings; Nancy E Lane; Andrew R Hoffman; Jodi Lapidus; Thomas M Gill; Charles E McCulloch; Marcia L Stefanick; Deborah M Kado; Rebecca Drieling; Eric S Orwoll Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Leo D Westbury; Holly E Syddall; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Nicholas C Harvey; Jane A Cauley; Eric J Shiroma; Roger A Fielding; Anne B Newman; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2020-11-15 Impact factor: 4.333