PURPOSE: To report the intraoperative optical coherence tomography findings in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) with connecting strands and to describe the postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective, case series study within a prospective observational intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging study was performed. Epiretinal membranes with connecting strands were characterized on preoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography images and assessed against corresponding intraoperative (after internal limiting membrane [ILM] peeling) and postoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. RESULTS: Eleven locations of the connecting strands in 7 eyes were studied. The connecting strands had visible connections from the inner retinal surface to the ERM in all locations, and the reflectivity was moderate in 8 locations and high in 3 locations. After ERM and ILM peeling, disconnected strands were identified in all of the intraoperative optical coherence tomography images. The reflectivity of the remaining intraoperative strands was higher than that of the preoperative lesions and appeared as "finger-like" and branching projections. The remaining disconnected lesions were contiguous with the inner retinal layers. Postoperatively, the intraoperative lesions disappeared completely in all locations, and recurrent formation of ERM was not identified in any eyes. CONCLUSION: In ERM eyes with connecting strands, intraoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging showed moderately to highly reflective sub-ILM finger-like lesions that persist immediately after membrane and ILM peeling. Postoperatively, the hyperreflective lesions disappeared spontaneously without localized nerve fiber layer loss. The sub-ILM connecting strands may represent glial retinal attachments.
PURPOSE: To report the intraoperative optical coherence tomography findings in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) with connecting strands and to describe the postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective, case series study within a prospective observational intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging study was performed. Epiretinal membranes with connecting strands were characterized on preoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography images and assessed against corresponding intraoperative (after internal limiting membrane [ILM] peeling) and postoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. RESULTS: Eleven locations of the connecting strands in 7 eyes were studied. The connecting strands had visible connections from the inner retinal surface to the ERM in all locations, and the reflectivity was moderate in 8 locations and high in 3 locations. After ERM and ILM peeling, disconnected strands were identified in all of the intraoperative optical coherence tomography images. The reflectivity of the remaining intraoperative strands was higher than that of the preoperative lesions and appeared as "finger-like" and branching projections. The remaining disconnected lesions were contiguous with the inner retinal layers. Postoperatively, the intraoperative lesions disappeared completely in all locations, and recurrent formation of ERM was not identified in any eyes. CONCLUSION: In ERM eyes with connecting strands, intraoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging showed moderately to highly reflective sub-ILM finger-like lesions that persist immediately after membrane and ILM peeling. Postoperatively, the hyperreflective lesions disappeared spontaneously without localized nerve fiber layer loss. The sub-ILM connecting strands may represent glial retinal attachments.
Authors: Tony H Ko; Andre J Witkin; James G Fujimoto; Annie Chan; Adam H Rogers; Caroline R Baumal; Joel S Schuman; Wolfgang Drexler; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2006-06
Authors: Robin Ray; David E Barañano; Jorge A Fortun; Bryan J Schwent; Blaine E Cribbs; Chris S Bergstrom; G Baker Hubbard; Sunil K Srivastava Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nihal Kenawy; David Wong; Theodore Stappler; Mario R Romano; Ronald A Das; Gillian Hebbar; Wendy Prime; Heinrich Heimann; Syed K Gibran; Carl M Sheridan; Yin Him Cheung; Paul S Hiscott Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Christian Viehland; Brenton Keller; Mark Draelos; Anthony N Kuo; Cynthia A Toth; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Mark Draelos; Brenton Keller; Christian Viehland; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Anthony Kuo; Joseph Izatt Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Chen D Lu; Nadia K Waheed; Andre Witkin; Caroline R Baumal; Jonathan J Liu; Benjamin Potsaid; Anthony Joseph; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; Alex Cable; Kinpui Chan; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Tisileli S Tuifua; Arjun B Sood; Joseph R Abraham; Sunil K Srivastava; Peter K Kaiser; Sumit Sharma; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; Rishi P Singh; Jamie Reese; Justis P Ehlers Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2021-02-27
Authors: Christian Viehland; Brenton Keller; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Derek Nankivil; Liangbo Shen; Shwetha Mangalesh; Du Tran Viet; Anthony N Kuo; Cynthia A Toth; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Brenton Keller; Christian Viehland; Liangbo Shen; Michael I Seider; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marc B Muijzer; Peter A W J Schellekens; Henny J M Beckers; Joke H de Boer; Saskia M Imhof; Robert P L Wisse Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.775