Literature DB >> 20006906

Does the presence of an epiretinal membrane alter the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane peeling?

Nihal Kenawy1, David Wong, Theodore Stappler, Mario R Romano, Ronald A Das, Gillian Hebbar, Wendy Prime, Heinrich Heimann, Syed K Gibran, Carl M Sheridan, Yin Him Cheung, Paul S Hiscott.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the presence of a clinically and/or microscopically detectable epiretinal membrane (ERM) alters the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, immunohistochemical study of ILM specimens using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one patients who had had ILM excision.
METHODS: Fifty-one ILM specimens peeled during vitrectomy for various etiologies were examined by light microscopy. The removal of ILM was assisted using Trypan blue (n = 30), indocyanine green (n = 7), or brilliant blue G (n = 14). Monoclonal antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein and to neurofilament protein were used to detect glial or neuronal cells respectively on the vitreous or retinal surfaces of the ILM. Specimens were divided into 2 groups: ILM peeled for full-thickness macular hole (MH; n = 31) and ILM peeled after removal of clinically detectable ERM (n = 20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the localization of immunohistochemical markers to neuronal or glial cells on the vitreous or retinal surfaces of ILM. The secondary outcome measure was the correlation of the results of the primary measure with the dyes used to facilitate ILM peeling.
RESULTS: Glial and/or neuronal cells were detected on the retinal surface of the ILM in 10 of 31 (32%) of the MH ILM specimens and in 13 of 20 (65%) of the ILM peeled after ERM excision; the difference was significant (P = 0.02). There was no association between the presence of neuronal and glial cells with the type of dye used (P = 0.2). Of the 23 ILM specimens with cells attached to the retinal surface, 21 (91%) were associated with clinical and/or histologic evidence of ERM and 2 (9%) were not. The correlation between the presence of cells on the vitreous and the retinal surfaces of ILM was high (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that ERM may be associated with sub-ILM changes that alter the plane of separation during ILM peeling. This study does not confirm any influence of dyes on the cleavage plane during surgery. Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006906     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  22 in total

1.  Is traction the cause or the effect?

Authors:  David Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Non-inverted pedicle internal limiting membrane transposition for large macular holes.

Authors:  Zizhong Hu; Xiaojian Ye; Xuehua Lv; Kang Liang; Weiwei Zhang; Xi Chen; Erbing Cao; Xunyi Gu; Qinghuai Liu; Ping Xie
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  INTRAOPERATIVE SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING AFTER INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE WITH CONNECTING STRANDS.

Authors:  Dong Heun Nam; Philip J Desouza; Paul Hahn; Vincent Tai; Monica B Sevilla; Du Tran-Viet; David Cunefare; Sina Farsiu; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Macular peeling-induced retinal damage: clinical and histopathological evaluation after using different dyes.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gennaro Ilardi; Mariantonia Ferrara; Gilda Cennamo; Barbara Parolini; Cesare Mariotti; Stefania Staibano; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  ILM peeling in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; does it improve the outcome?

Authors:  D H Steel; A M Joussen; D Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Deep and superficial OCT angiography changes after macular peeling: idiopathic vs diabetic epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gilda Cennamo; Stefano Schiemer; Claudia Rossi; Federica Sparnelli; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole.

Authors:  Suman Pilli; Robert J Zawadzki; John S Werner; Susanna S Park
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  LONG-TERM RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF VISUAL ACUITY AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOPOGRAPHIC CHANGES AFTER SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE PEELING DURING VITRECTOMY FOR MACULAR EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES.

Authors:  Jesse J Jung; Quan V Hoang; Megan L Ridley-Lane; Dov B Sebrow; Elona Dhrami-Gavazi; Stanley Chang
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Intraretinal changes in the presence of epiretinal traction.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gilda Cennamo; Francesca Amoroso; Daniela Montorio; Carlo Castellani; Michele Reibaldi; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  An evaluation of two heavier-than-water internal limiting membrane-specific dyes during macular hole surgery.

Authors:  David H W Steel; Ayesha A Karimi; Kathryn White
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.