Literature DB >> 25828499

Computed tomography evaluation of the normal craniocervical junction craniometry in 100 asymptomatic patients.

Ulysses C Batista1, Andrei F Joaquim, Yvens B Fernandes, Roger N Mathias, Enrico Ghizoni, Helder Tedeschi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Most of the craniometric relationships of the normal craniocervical junction (CCJ), especially those related to angular craniometry, are still poorly studied and based on measurements taken from simple plain radiographs. In this study, the authors performed a craniometric evaluation of the CCJ in a population without known CCJ anomalies. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the normal CCJ craniometry based on measurements obtained from CT scans.
METHOD: The authors analyzed 100 consecutive CCJ CT scans obtained in adult patients who were admitted at their tertiary hospital for treatment of non-CCJ conditions between 2010 and 2012. A total of 17 craniometrical measurements were performed, including the relation of the odontoid with the cranial base, the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus length, the clivus-canal angle (CCA)-the angle formed by the clivus and the upper cervical spine, and the basal angle.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 100 patients was 50.6 years, and the group included 52 men (52%) and 48 women (48%). In 5 patients (5%), the tip of the odontoid process was more than 2 mm above the Chamberlain line, and in one of these 5 patients (1% of the study group). it was more than 5 mm above it. One patient had a Grabb-Oakes measurement above 9 mm (suggesting ventral cervicomedullary encroachment). The mean ADI value was 1.1 mm. The thickness of the external occipital protuberance ranged from 7.42 to 22.36 mm. The mean clivus length was 44.74 mm, the mean CCA was 153.68° (range 132.32°-173.95°), and the mean basal angle was 113.73° (ranging from 97.06°-133.26°).
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in this study can be useful for evaluating anomalies of the CCJ in comparison with normal parameters, potentially improving the diagnostic criteria of these anomalies. When evaluating CCJ malformations, one should take into account the normal ranges based on CT scans, with more precise bone landmarks, instead of those obtained from simple plain radiographs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADI = atlantodental interval; CCA = clivus-canal angle (angle formed by a line extending from the surface of the clivus and a line extending from the inferodorsal portion of the C-2 body); CCJ = cranicervical junction; CM = Chiari malformation; CT scan; EOP = external occipital protuberance; FM = foramen magnum; craniocervical junction; craniometry; normal; relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25828499     DOI: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  12 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of classical radiological measurements for basilar invagination of type B at MRI.

Authors:  José J C Nascimento; Eulâmpio J S Neto; Carlos F Mello-Junior; Marcelo M Valença; Severino A Araújo-Neto; Paula R B Diniz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphological classification of the tubercle of insertion of the transverse atlantal ligament: A computer tomography-based anatomical study of 200 subjects.

Authors:  Kyle Mueller; Ashley MacConnell; Frank Berkowitz; Jean-Marc Voyadzis
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-07-10

Review 3.  [Occipitocervical junction: Aanatomy, craniometry and pathology].

Authors:  J Furtner; R Woitek; U Asenbaum; D Prayer; C Schueller-Weidekamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Occipitocervical Fixation: General Considerations and Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Andrei Fernandes Joaquim; Joseph A Osorio; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-09-24

Review 5.  Dural arteriovenous fistula of the lateral foramen magnum region: A review.

Authors:  Chao Li; Jing Yu; Kailing Li; Kun Hou; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Identification of clinical and radiographic predictors of central nervous system injury in genetic skeletal disorders.

Authors:  Antônio L Cunha; Ana P S Champs; Carla M Mello; Mônica M M Navarro; Frederico J C Godinho; Cássia M B Carvalho; Teresa C A Ferrari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Role of dynamic computed tomography scans in patients with congenital craniovertebral junction malformations.

Authors:  Otávio Turolo da Silva; Enrico Ghizoni; Helder Tedeschi; Andrei Fernandes Joaquim
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-18

8.  Comparison of imaging parameters pre- and post- reductive procedure for atlantoaxial dislocation via posterior fixation using pedicle screw and rod: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jia Shao; Yanzheng Gao; Kun Gao; Zhenghong Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Normal range of clivoaxial angle in adults using flexion and extension cervical magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Authors:  Anousheh Sayah; April D Farley; Eric C Munoz; Faheem A Sandhu; Frank Berkowitz
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-03-08

10.  Impact of imaging modality, age, and gender on craniocervical junction angles in adults without structural pathology.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Graham M Winston; Jacob Goldberg; Cloe Curri; Nicholas Williams; J Levi Chazen; Jeffrey P Greenfield; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.