Anousheh Sayah1, April D Farley2, Eric C Munoz3, Faheem A Sandhu4, Frank Berkowitz1. 1. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, USA. 2. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, USA. 3. ZIA Diagnostic Imaging, USA. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An abnormally decreased clivoaxial angle (CXA) is used during the clinical evaluation for corrective skull base surgery. Published normal ranges of CXA using x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vary dramatically, especially with neck flexion or extension. The aim of this study was to use high-resolution MRI to determine the normal range of CXA in various neck positions using a reproducible measurement technique. METHODS: The CXA was measured in 10 healthy volunteers on sagittal T2 SPACE c-spine MRI in supine and prone positions and with the neck both neck and extended. CXA is strictly defined as the angle between a line along the inferior third of the dorsal clival cortex and a line from the superior/posterior cortex of the dens to the posterior/inferior corner of the C2 body. Statistical analysis was performed in all positions and included mean CXA, range, standard deviation (SD), inter-reader agreement, and group comparisons. RESULTS: The mean CXA overall was 156.92° (SD=4.23°; range 134-179°). The mean value for extension CXA was 169.20° (SD=5.81°), and the mean value for flexion CXA was 144.73° (SD=5.71°), the difference being statistically significant (p<0.0001) regardless of supine or prone position. Concordant correlations of reader measurements showed substantial agreement in the supine position at 0.96, with lower agreement in the prone position at 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: We report normal ranges for CXA in various neck positions based on 3D T2-weighted MRI, using a reproducible measurement method. There was a significant difference in the CXA values between neck extended and neck flexed positions but not between supine and prone positions.
OBJECTIVE: An abnormally decreased clivoaxial angle (CXA) is used during the clinical evaluation for corrective skull base surgery. Published normal ranges of CXA using x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vary dramatically, especially with neck flexion or extension. The aim of this study was to use high-resolution MRI to determine the normal range of CXA in various neck positions using a reproducible measurement technique. METHODS: The CXA was measured in 10 healthy volunteers on sagittal T2 SPACE c-spine MRI in supine and prone positions and with the neck both neck and extended. CXA is strictly defined as the angle between a line along the inferior third of the dorsal clival cortex and a line from the superior/posterior cortex of the dens to the posterior/inferior corner of the C2 body. Statistical analysis was performed in all positions and included mean CXA, range, standard deviation (SD), inter-reader agreement, and group comparisons. RESULTS: The mean CXA overall was 156.92° (SD=4.23°; range 134-179°). The mean value for extension CXA was 169.20° (SD=5.81°), and the mean value for flexion CXA was 144.73° (SD=5.71°), the difference being statistically significant (p<0.0001) regardless of supine or prone position. Concordant correlations of reader measurements showed substantial agreement in the supine position at 0.96, with lower agreement in the prone position at 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: We report normal ranges for CXA in various neck positions based on 3D T2-weighted MRI, using a reproducible measurement method. There was a significant difference in the CXA values between neck extended and neck flexed positions but not between supine and prone positions.
Authors: Robert J Bollo; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Meghan M Brockmeyer; Douglas L Brockmeyer Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Ulysses C Batista; Andrei F Joaquim; Yvens B Fernandes; Roger N Mathias; Enrico Ghizoni; Helder Tedeschi Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Fraser C Henderson; Fraser C Henderson; William A Wilson; Alexander S Mark; Myles Koby Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Ibrahim Hussain; Graham M Winston; Jacob Goldberg; Cloe Curri; Nicholas Williams; J Levi Chazen; Jeffrey P Greenfield; Ali A Baaj Journal: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Date: 2020-01-23