Literature DB >> 30498960

Diagnostic accuracy of classical radiological measurements for basilar invagination of type B at MRI.

José J C Nascimento1, Eulâmpio J S Neto2, Carlos F Mello-Junior3, Marcelo M Valença4,5,6, Severino A Araújo-Neto3, Paula R B Diniz4,6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of classical measurements for basilar invagination (BI) of type B at MRI.
METHODS: This study used head MRIs from 31 participants with BI type B and 96 controls. The radiological criterion for BI was the odontoid process invagination using the obex as reference. It based on the independent prospective reading of two neuroradiologists. Concordance between the two neuroradiologists was analysed through the KAPPA index, and the discrepancy was resolved in a consensus meeting. A third examiner measured in two occasions (double blind) the distance of the odontoid apex to Chamberlain's line (DOCL) and McGregor's line (DOMG), clivus canal angle (CCA), Welcker's basal angle (WBA), and Boogaard's angle (BOA). Intra-examiner reproducibility of the measurements was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the diagnostic accuracy by ROC curve. All analyses were at 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: Agreement between the two neuroradiologists was statistically relevant (KAPPA = .91; P = .0001). The intra-examiner reproducibilities were .98 (DOCL), .97 (DOMG), .96 (CCA), .94 (WBA), and .95 (BOA) (P < .05). The areas under the ROC curve were .963 (DOCL), .940 (DOMG), .880 (CCA), .867 (WBA), and .951 (BOA) (P < .05). The cut-off criteria were ≥ 7 mm (DOCL), ≥ 8 mm (DOMG), ≤ 145° (CCA), ≥ 142° (WBA), and ≥ 136° (BOA). The diagnostic accuracies were .904 (DOCL), .870 (DOMG), .844 (CCA), .810 (WBA), and .899 (BOA).
CONCLUSION: The DOCL and BOA presented the highest diagnostic accuracy for BI type B. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basilar invagination; Boogaard’s angle; Chamberlain line; Diagnostic accuracy; Roc curve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30498960     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5841-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation.

Authors:  Atul Goel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-10

3.  Cranial base abnormalities in osteogenesis imperfecta: phenotypic and genotypic determinants.

Authors:  Moira S Cheung; Heidi Arponen; Peter Roughley; Michel E Azouz; Francis H Glorieux; Janna Waltimo-Sirén; Frank Rauch
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  MRI evaluation and measurement of the normal odontoid peg position.

Authors:  C G Cronin; D G Lohan; J Ni Mhuircheartigh; C P Meehan; J M Murphy; C Roche
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  CT evaluation of Chamberlain's, McGregor's, and McRae's skull-base lines.

Authors:  C G Cronin; D G Lohan; J N Mhuircheartigh; C P Meehan; J Murphy; C Roche
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  The significance of certain measurements of the skull in the diagnosis of basilar impression.

Authors:  M McGREGER
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1948-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging study of the craniocervical junction.

Authors:  A Tassanawipas; S Mokkhavesa; S Chatchavong; P Worawittayawong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.118

Review 8.  Imaging the craniocervical junction.

Authors:  Wendy R K Smoker; Geetika Khanna
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Diagnosing basilar invagination in the rheumatoid patient. The reliability of radiographic criteria.

Authors:  K D Riew; A S Hilibrand; M A Palumbo; N Sethi; H H Bohlman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Basilar invagination, Chiari malformation, syringomyelia: a review.

Authors:  Atul Goel
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  Craniometric parameters for the evaluation of platybasia and basilar invagination on magnetic resonance imaging: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  Alexandre Tejo Pereira de Brito Silva; Lucas Tejo Pereira de Brito Silva; Alysson Emannuel Neves Rodrigues Vieira; Cibelle Ingrid Estevão de Melo; José Jailson Costa do Nascimento; Carlos Fernando de Mello Júnior; Selene Cordeiro Vasconcelos; Severino Aires de Araújo-Neto
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct

2.  Agenesis of the posterior arch of the atlas and complex alterations of the craniovertebral junction: A case report.

Authors:  Roberto Madeddu; Andrea Cecchini; Vittorio Mazzarello; Maria Alessandra Sotgiu; Cristiano Farace; Pasquale Bandiera
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-29

3.  Impact of imaging modality, age, and gender on craniocervical junction angles in adults without structural pathology.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Graham M Winston; Jacob Goldberg; Cloe Curri; Nicholas Williams; J Levi Chazen; Jeffrey P Greenfield; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-01-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.