Literature DB >> 32282198

Further Optimization and Validation of the Classical Drude Polarizable Protein Force Field.

Fang-Yu Lin1, Jing Huang1,2, Poonam Pandey1, Chetan Rupakheti3, Jing Li3, Benoı T Roux3, Alexander D MacKerell1.   

Abstract

The CHARMM Drude-2013 polarizable force field (FF) was developed to include the explicit treatment of induced electronic polarizability, resulting in a more accurate description of the electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. While the Drude-2013 protein FF has shown success in improving the folding properties of α-helical peptides and to reproduce experimental observables in simulations up to 1 μs, some limitations were noted regarding the stability of β-sheet structures in simulations longer than 100 ns as well as larger deviations from crystal structures in simulations of a number of proteins compared to the additive CHARMM36 protein FF. The origin of the instability has been identified and appears to be primarily due to overestimated atomic polarizabilities and induced dipole-dipole interactions on the Cβ, Cγ, and Cδ side chain atoms. To resolve this and other issues, a number of aspects of the model were revisited, resulting in Drude-2019 protein FF. Backbone parameters were optimized targeting the conformational properties of the (Ala)5 peptide in solution along with gas phase properties of the alanine dipeptide. Dipeptides that contain N-acetylated and N'-methylamidated termini, excluding Gly, Pro, and Ala, were used as models to optimize the atomic polarizabilities and Thole screening factors on selected Cβ, Cγ, and Cδ carbons by targeting quantum mechanical (QM) dipole moments and molecular polarizabilities. In addition, to obtain better conformational properties, side chain χ1 and χ2 dihedral parameters were optimized targeting QM data for the respective side chain dipeptide conformations as well as Protein Data Bank survey data based on the χ1, χ2 sampling from Hamiltonian replica-exchange MD simulations of (Ala)4-X-(Ala)4 in solution, where X is the amino acid of interest. Further improvements include optimizing nonbonded interactions between charged residues to reproduce QM interaction energies of the charged-protein model compounds and experimental osmotic pressures. Validation of the optimized Drude protein FF includes MD simulations of a collection of peptides and proteins including β-sheet structures, as well as transmembrane ion channels. Results showed that the updated Drude-2019 protein FF yields smaller overall root-mean-square differences of proteins as compared to the additive CHARMM36m and Drude-2013 FFs as well as similar or improved agreement with experimental NMR properties, allowing for long time scale simulation studies of proteins and more complex biomolecular systems in conjunction with the remainder of the Drude polarizable FF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32282198      PMCID: PMC7306265          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  97 in total

1.  Designing a 20-residue protein.

Authors:  Jonathan W Neidigh; R Matthew Fesinmeyer; Niels H Andersen
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-06

2.  NMR solution structure of a highly stable de novo heterodimeric coiled-coil.

Authors:  Darrin A Lindhout; Jennifer R Litowski; Pascal Mercier; Robert S Hodges; Brian D Sykes
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2004-12-05       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  Determination of Electrostatic Parameters for a Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.

Authors:  Victor M Anisimov; Guillaume Lamoureux; Igor V Vorobyov; Niu Huang; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Conformation of the backbone in unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Zhengshuang Shi; Kang Chen; Zhigang Liu; Neville R Kallenbach
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Crystal structure of a ten-amino acid protein.

Authors:  Shinya Honda; Toshihiko Akiba; Yusuke S Kato; Yoshito Sawada; Masakazu Sekijima; Miyuki Ishimura; Ayako Ooishi; Hideki Watanabe; Takayuki Odahara; Kazuaki Harata
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  CHARMM additive and polarizable force fields for biophysics and computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-08-19

7.  Simulation study of ion pairing in concentrated aqueous salt solutions with a polarizable force field.

Authors:  Yun Luo; Wei Jiang; Haibo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoit Roux
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.008

8.  Combining the polarizable Drude force field with a continuum electrostatic Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvation model.

Authors:  Alexey Aleksandrov; Fang-Yu Lin; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Polarizable Force Field for DNA Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator: II. Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Duplex DNA.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: biology still waits for physics.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  16 in total

1.  Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; David J Hardy; Julio D C Maia; John E Stone; João V Ribeiro; Rafael C Bernardi; Ronak Buch; Giacomo Fiorin; Jérôme Hénin; Wei Jiang; Ryan McGreevy; Marcelo C R Melo; Brian K Radak; Robert D Skeel; Abhishek Singharoy; Yi Wang; Benoît Roux; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Laxmikant V Kalé; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Protein assembly and crowding simulations.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Yuji Sugita; Michael Feig
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Integration of Experimental Data and Use of Automated Fitting Methods in Developing Protein Force Fields.

Authors:  Marcelo D Polêto; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  Commun Chem       Date:  2022-03-18

4.  Electronic Polarization at the Interface between the p53 Transactivation Domain and Two Binding Partners.

Authors:  Alexsandra N Corrigan; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Impact of Electronic Polarization on Preformed, β-Strand Rich Homogenous and Heterogenous Amyloid Oligomers.

Authors:  Kelsie M King; Amanda K Sharp; Darcy S Davidson; Anne M Brown; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  J Comput Biophys Chem       Date:  2021-12-29

6.  Computational methods and theory for ion channel research.

Authors:  C Guardiani; F Cecconi; L Chiodo; G Cottone; P Malgaretti; L Maragliano; M L Barabash; G Camisasca; M Ceccarelli; B Corry; R Roth; A Giacomello; B Roux
Journal:  Adv Phys X       Date:  2022

7.  Extension of the CHARMM Classical Drude Polarizable Force Field to N- and O-Linked Glycopeptides and Glycoproteins.

Authors:  Abhishek A Kognole; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Effects of Familial Alzheimer's Disease Mutations on the Folding Free Energy and Dipole-Dipole Interactions of the Amyloid β-Peptide.

Authors:  Darcy S Davidson; Joshua A Kraus; Julia M Montgomery; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Preparing and Analyzing Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the Classical Drude Oscillator Model.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

10.  Biomolecular Modeling and Simulation: A Prospering Multidisciplinary Field.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Christopher G Myers; Lauren Beljak; Justin Chen; Sami Dakhel; Daniel Darling; Sayak Ghosh; Joseph Hall; Mikaeel Jan; Emily Liang; Sera Saju; Mackenzie Vohr; Chris Wu; Yifan Xu; Eva Xue
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.