| Literature DB >> 25822872 |
Stéphano Freitas Soares Melo1, Valério Garrone Barauna2, Miguel Araújo Carneiro Júnior3, Luiz Henrique Marchesi Bozi4, Lucas Rios Drummond5, Antônio José Natali6, Edilamar Menezes de Oliveira7.
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the effects of resistance training (RT) on the expression of microRNA (miRNA)-214 and its target in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2a), and on the morphological and mechanical properties of isolated left ventricular myocytes. MAINEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25822872 PMCID: PMC4424992 DOI: 10.3390/ijms16046855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Body weight (BW), left ventricular (LV), left ventricular weight/body weight ratio of 7 animals per control (CO) and trained (TR) groups. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 when compared with the control group. One repetition maximum (1RM).
| Parameters | CO | TR |
|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 348.9 ± 6.7 | 341.7 ± 8.5 |
| LVW (mg) | 632.1 ± 30.9 | 753.5 ± 35.4 |
| LV/BW (mg/g) | 1.8 ± 0.06 | 2.2 ± 0.04 * |
| 1RM Initial (g) | 639.2 ± 35.2 | 643.7 ± 41.4 |
| 1RM Final (g) | 1070.4 ± 41.7 | 2168.2 ± 37.8 * |
Figure 1Cardiomyocyte dimensions of isolated LV myocytes. (A) Cell width; (B) Cell volume; and (C) Cell length. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation of 70 cells per group and 7 animals each group. At least 10 cells were analyzed from each animal. * p < 0.05 when compared to control group.
Figure 2Cell contractility (A) Time to half relaxation; and (B) Time to peak contraction of cardiomyocytes from trained (n = 7 rats and 108 cells) and control (n = 7 rats and 96 cells) groups. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 when compared to control group.
Figure 3Protein expression level and miRNA. (A) Representative western blot image and SERCA2a protein expression; (B) miRNA expression level; and (C) Schematic summary of the results showing both the morphological and functional adaptations induced by the resistance training. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 when compared to control group.
Figure 4Apparatus adapted from Tamaki et al. (1992) [50], used to perform resistance training in the rats [3,4].