| Literature DB >> 28793051 |
D L M Barretti1, S F S Melo1,2, E M Oliveira1, V G Barauna2.
Abstract
Elevated salt intake induces changes in the extracellular matrix collagen, leading to myocardial stiffness and impaired relaxation. Resistance training (RT) has been used as a remarkably successful strategy in the treatment of heart disease. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RT on preventing pathological adaptation of the left ventricle (LV) induced by salt overload. Male Wistar rats (10 weeks old) were distributed into four groups (n=8/group): control (CO), control+1% salt (CO+SALT), RT and RT+1% salt (RT+SALT). The RT protocol consisted of 4×12 bouts of squat training, 5/week for 8 weeks, with 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM). Echocardiographs were analyzed and interstitial collagen volume fraction (CVF) was determined in the LV. The 1RM tests in the RT and RT+SALT groups increased 145 and 137%, respectively, compared with the test performed before the training program. LV weight-to-body weight ratio and LV weight-to-tibia length ratio were greater in the RT and RT+SALT groups, respectively, compared with the CO group. Although there was no difference in the systolic function between groups, diastolic function decreased 25% in the CO+SALT group compared with the CO group measured by E/A wave ratio. RT partially prevented this decrease in diastolic function compared with the CO+SALT group. A 1% salt overload increased CVF more than 2.4-fold in the CO+SALT group compared with the CO group and RT prevented this increase. In conclusion, RT prevented interstitial collagen deposition in LV rats subjected to 1% NaCl and attenuated diastolic dysfunction induced by salt overload independent of alterations in blood pressure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28793051 PMCID: PMC5572849 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20176146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1.A, Apparatus used to perform resistance training in the rats adapted from Tamaki et al. (10); B, left ventricle (LV) weight-to-body weight (LV/BW) ratio (mg/g); C, LV weight-to-tibia length (LV/TL) ratio (mg/mm); D, myocardial interstitial collagen volume fraction; E, representative images of the collagen fibers stained with picro-sirius red in the myocardium. Data are reported as means±SE for 8 rats in each group. CO: control; CO+SALT: control+1% salt diet; RT: resistance trained; RT+SALT: resistance trained+1% salt diet. *P<0.05 vs CO and CO+SALT. For all variables, one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan post hoc test was used.
Body mass, absolute 1RM, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate.
| Data | CO | CO+SALT | RT | RT+SALT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | ||||
| 1st week | 396±8 | 370±7 | 383±5 | 386.8±6 |
| 8th week | 458±3 | 424±5 | 420±8 | 417.8±0 |
| 1RM (g) | ||||
| 1st week | 889±22 | 910±5 | 924±19 | 1011±44 |
| 8th week | 1010±84 | 1080±72 | 2271±74 | 2400±105 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 123±3 | 126±4 | 122±4 | 119±9 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 101±4 | 99±3 | 98±5 | 97±8 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 341±8 | 344±10 | 325±11 | 326±9 |
Data are reported as means±SE for 8 rats in each group. Body weight and 1RM values were measured in the 1st and 8th weeks of the training protocol. Direct measurement of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were performed 48 h after the last training session. 1RM: 1 repetition maximum; CO: control; CO+SALT: control+1% salt diet; RT: resistance-trained; RT+SALT: resistance-trained+1% salt diet.
P<0.05, 8th vs 1st week. For body weight and 1RM, two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan post hoc test was used. For blood pressure and heart rate, one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan post hoc test was used.
Heart rate, cardiac structure, systolic and diastolic left ventricle (LV) function by echocardiography.
| Data | CO | CO+SALT | RT | RT+SALT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 321±4 | 310±16 | 318±9 | 312±12 |
| LVIDd | 0.74±0.04 | 0.75±0.08 | 0.76±0.06 | 0.77±0.07 |
| PWTd | 0.144±0.006 | 0.140±0.004 | 0.155±0.005 | 0.158±0.004 |
| IVSTd | 0.143±0.007 | 0.141±0.005 | 0.154±0.003 | 0.157±0.004 |
| LVM (g) | 0.68±0.04 | 0.67±0.05 | 0.76±0.03 | 0.83±0.04 |
| Systolic function | ||||
| FS (%) | 35.2±0.8 | 33.4±1.1 | 36.8±1 | 36.2±1.4 |
| EF (%) | 71.8±1.4 | 67.8±1.5 | 72.2±1.2 | 72.4±1.8 |
| VCF (m/s) | 4.5±0.1 | 4.3±0.2 | 4.5±0.2 | 4.8±0.2 |
| Diastolic function | ||||
| E-wave (m/s) | 0.571±0.012 | 0.572±0.023 | 0.570±0.017 | 0.553±0.013 |
| A-wave (m/s) | 0.315±0.008 | 0.419±0.015 | 0.306±0.008 | 0.360±0.014 |
| E/A ratio | 1.81±0.01 | 1.37±0.03 | 1.87±0.05 | 1.55±0.05 |
Data are reported as mean±SE for 8 rats in each group. Echocardiography was performed 24 h after the last training session. CO: control; CO+SALT: control+1% salt diet; RT: resistance-trained; RT+SALT: resistance-trained+1% salt diet; LVIDd: left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter; PWTd: diastolic posterior wall thickness; IVSTd: diastolic interventricular septum thickness; LVM: left ventricular mass; FS: left ventricular fractional shortening; EF: left ventricular ejection fraction; VCF: velocity of circumferential fiber shortening; E and A: early and late waves.
P<0.05 vs CO and RT;
P<0.05 vs CO+SALT;
P<0.05 vs CO and CO+SALT (one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan post hoc test).