| Literature DB >> 25340545 |
Jadson P Alves1, Ramiro B Nunes1, Giuseppe P Stefani1, Pedro Dal Lago2.
Abstract
The role of resistance training on collagen deposition, the inflammatory profile and muscle weakness in heart failure remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the influence of a resistance training program on hemodynamic function, maximum strength gain, collagen deposition and inflammatory profile in chronic heart failure rats. Thirty-two male Wistar rats submitted to myocardial infarction by coronary artery ligation or sham surgery were assigned into four groups: sedentary sham (S-Sham, n = 8); trained sham (T-Sham, n = 8); sedentary chronic heart failure (S-CHF, n = 8) and trained chronic heart failure (T-CHF, n = 8). The maximum strength capacity was evaluated by the one maximum repetition test. Trained groups were submitted to an 8-week resistance training program (4 days/week, 4 sets of 10-12 repetitions/session, at 65% to 75% of one maximum repetition). After 8 weeks of the resistance training program, the T-CHF group showed lower left ventricular end diastolic pressure (P<0.001), higher left ventricular systolic pressure (P<0.05), higher systolic blood pressure (P<0.05), an improvement in the maximal positive derivative of ventricular pressure (P<0.05) and maximal negative derivative of ventricular pressure (P<0.05) when compared to the S-CHF group; no differences were observed when compared to Sham groups. In addition, resistance training was able to reduce myocardial hypertrophy (P<0.05), left ventricular total collagen volume fraction (P<0.01), IL-6 (P<0.05), and TNF-α/IL-10 ratio (P<0.05), as well as increasing IL-10 (P<0.05) in chronic heart failure rats when compared to the S-CHF group. Eight weeks of resistance training promotes an improvement of cardiac function, strength gain, collagen deposition and inflammatory profile in chronic heart failure rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25340545 PMCID: PMC4207701 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Representative illustration of the apparatus used for resistance training.
Figure 2Absolute values for one repetition maximal test (1RM).
(A). Relative values for one repetition maximal test (1RM) (B). Values are means ± SE; n = 8 for all groups. S-Sham, sedentary sham rats; T-Sham, training sham rats; S-CHF, sedentary chronic heart failure rats; T-CHF, training chronic heart failure rats. *P<0.001 compared to sedentary groups. †P<0.01 compared to sedentary groups ‡P<0.05 compared to S-Sham group.
Body weight, morphometric cardiac characteristics, infarct area and pulmonary and hepatic congestion of sham-operated rats and rats with left ventricular dysfunction.
| Variables | S-Sham | T-Sham | S-CHF | T-CHF |
| Initial Body Weight, g | 253.4±3 | 250.0±4 | 253.0±4 | 258.0±4 |
| Final Body Weight, g | 354.0±10 | 321.0±5 | 345.0±13 | 340.0±9 |
| Infarcted Area % | ---------- | ---------- | 41.5±2 | 39.3±1 |
| MW/BW mg/g | 3.1±0.05† | 3.5±0.10 | 4.2±0.16* | 3.8±0.09 |
| LVW/BW mg/g | 2.4±0.05† | 2.8±0.09 | 3.2±0.10‡ | 3.1±0.06 |
| RVW/BW mg/g | 0.69±0.03 | 0.64±0.04 | 1.02±0.09* | 0.74±0.05 |
| Pulmonary Congestion (PC) % | 73.2±0.57 | 70.7±1.2 | 77.0±1.3* | 71.9±1.1 |
| Hepatic Congestion (HC) % | 70.8±0.24 | 70.3±0.19 | 70.8±0.38 | 70.2±0.26 |
Values are means ± SE; n = 8 for all groups. S-Sham, sedentary sham rats; T-Sham, training sham rats; S-CHF, sedentary chronic heart failure rats; T-CHF, training chronic heart failure rats. MW/BW, myocardial weight-to-body weight ratio; LVW/BW, left ventricle-to-body weight ratio and RVW/BW, right ventricle-to-body weight ratio. *P<0.05 compared to all groups. † P<0.05 compared to trained groups. ‡ P<0.05 compared to Sham groups.
Mean blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, ventricular systolic pressure, left ventricular maximum change in pressure over time and left ventricular minimum change in pressure over time of sham-operated rats and rats with left ventricular dysfunction.
| Variables | S-Sham | T-Sham | S-CHF | T-CHF |
| MBP (mmHg) | 99.3±3.9 | 101.8±4.5 | 85.7±3.2 | 99.2±5.8 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 85.9±3.8 | 89.0±4.4 | 76.4±3.2 | 88.0±5.5 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 112.0±4.3 | 112.09±4.7 | 94.19±3.3* | 108.08±6.1 |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | 5.52±0.65 | 4.50±0.89 | 24.20±1.5* | 7.62±1.4 |
| LVSP (mmHg) | 113.00±6 | 107.80±4 | 88.14±3* | 102.61±6 |
| + dP/dtmax (mmHg) | 6071±603 | 5926±750 | 3548±320* | 5290±599 |
| − dP/dtmax (mmHg) | 4154±376 | 4024±358 | 2495±159* | 3519±414 |
Values are means ± SE; n = 8 for all groups. S-Sham, sedentary sham rats; T-Sham, training sham rats; S-CHF, sedentary chronic heart failure rats; T-CHF, training chronic heart failure rats. Mean blood pressure (MBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), maximal positive derivative of ventricular pressure (+dP/dtmax) and maximal negative derivative of ventricular pressure (−dP/dtmax). *P<0.05 compared to all groups.
Figure 3Representative images of ventricular sections stained with Picrosirius (A–D) and statistical analysis (E).
Values are means ± SE. The arrows indicate collagen detected in polarized light. A. S-Sham, sedentary sham rats (n = 7); B. T-Sham, training sham rats (n = 8); C. S-CHF, sedentary chronic heart failure rats (n = 8); D. T-CHF, training chronic heart failure rats (n = 8). *P<0.01 compared to trained groups. †P<0.001 compared with S-Sham group.
Figure 4Plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TNF- α to IL-10 ratio and IL-6 to IL-10 ratio (A–E).
Values are means ± SE. Figure A) S-Sham, sedentary sham rats (n = 5); T-Sham, training sham rats (n = 5); S-CHF, sedentary chronic heart failure rats (n = 5); T-CHF, training chronic heart failure rats (n = 6). Figure B, C and D, n = 6 for all groups. Figure E, n = 5 for all groups. *P<0.05 compared to all groups. †P<0.05 compared to sedentary groups. ‡P<0.05 compared to trained groups.