Literature DB >> 25820518

Agreement between diurnal variations of intraocular pressure by Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients on topical anti-glaucoma medication.

Shikha Gupta1, Gautam Sinha2, Reetika Sharma1, Bhagabat Nayak1, Bharat Patil1, Bibhuti Kashyap1, Abdul Shameer1, Tanuj Dada1.   

Abstract

To estimate agreement in diurnal variations of intraocular pressure (IOP) by Tono-Pen (TP) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in glaucoma patients on topical anti-glaucoma medication(s). IOP was measured at every 3 h from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. in 50 eyes of glaucoma patients on topical medication(s). Diurnal fluctuation of IOP by each method was calculated as maximum-minimum IOP in a day. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymeter. There was good correlation between TP and GAT at all times during a day, minimum, and maximum IOPs during a day (Correlation coefficient, 0.706 at 7 a.m., 0.624 at 10 a.m., 0.682 at 1 p.m., 0.814 at 4 p.m., 0.652 at 7 p.m., 0.572 at 10 p.m., 0.668 minimum IOP, 0.689 maximum IOP). Mean IOPs by TP were always higher than GAT at all times during a day. Bland-Altman plots suggested a close relationship between the two sets of readings, and that this relationship was consistent at different times in a day, in maximum IOPs, minimum IOPs and also in fluctuation of IOPs. Linear regression analysis between the differences of diurnal fluctuation (diurnal fluctuation by GAT-diurnal fluctuation by TP) and CCT showed strong association (R 2 = 0.857, p < 0.001). The mean change in difference of diurnal fluctuation (GAT-TP) for a 10-micron increase in CCT was 0.69 mmHg. TP can be considered a reliable alternative to GAT in glaucoma patients for knowing the diurnal control of IOP; however these two methods should not be used interchangeably. Difference of diurnal fluctuation between two methods is dependent on CCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central corneal thickness; Diurnal fluctuation; Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation; Intraocular pressure; Tono-Pen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25820518     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-015-0067-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  26 in total

1.  Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes.

Authors:  V J Rao; L Gnanaraj; K W Mitchell; F C Figueiredo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  [Comparison of precision of the TonoPenXL with the Goldmann and Draeger applanation tonometer in a sitting and recumbent position of the patients -- a clinical study on 251 eyes].

Authors:  Arne Viestenz; Berthold Lausen; Anselm M Jünemann; Christian Y Mardin
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.700

3.  DIURNAL VARIATION OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN TREATED GLAUCOMA. SIGNIFICANCE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC SIMPLE GLAUCOMA.

Authors:  S M DRANCE
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1963-09

4.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Reliability of intraocular pressure by Tono-Pen XL over amniotic membrane patch in human.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Yoshita; Akira Kobayashi; Mami Takahashi; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Maria L Salvetat; Marco Zeppieri; Claudia Tosoni; Paolo Brusini
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2007-05

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  S Asrani; R Zeimer; J Wilensky; D Gieser; S Vitale; K Lindenmuth
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correlation between central corneal thickness and myopia.

Authors:  Michael Mimouni; Victor Flores; Yinon Shapira; Shmuel Graffi; Shmuel Levartovsky; Tzahi Sela; Gur Munzer; Igor Kaiserman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Healthy Pediatric Patients using Three Types of Tonometers.

Authors:  Muhsin Eraslan; Eren Çerman; Sena Sümmen
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.