Literature DB >> 25814380

Disruption of the auditory response to a regular click train by a single, extra click.

Bernd Lütkenhöner1, Roy D Patterson.   

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that the steady-state response to a periodic sequence of clicks can be modeled as the superposition of responses to single clicks. Here, this hypothesis is challenged by presenting an extra click halfway between two consecutive clicks of a regular series, while measuring the auditory evoked field. After a solitary click at time zero, the click series sounded from 100 to 900 ms, with the extra click presented around 500 ms. The silent period between two stimulus sequences was 310-390 ms (uniformly distributed) so that one stimulation cycle lasted, on average, 1250 ms. Five different click rates between 20 and 60 Hz were examined. The disturbance caused by the extra click was revealed by subtracting the estimated steady-state response from the joint response to the click series and the extra click. The early peaks of the single-click response effectively coincide with same-polarity peaks of the 20-Hz steady-state response. Nevertheless, prediction of the latter from the former proved impossible. However, the 40-Hz steady-state response can be predicted reasonably well from the 20-Hz steady-state response. Somewhat surprisingly, the amplitude of the evoked response to the extra click grew when the click rate of the train was increased from 20 to 30 Hz; the opposite effect would have been expected from research on adaptation. The smaller amplitude at lower click rates might be explained by forward suppression. In this case, the apparent escape from suppression at higher rates might indicate that the clicks belonging to the periodic train are being integrated into an auditory stream, possibly in much the same manner as in classical stream segregation experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25814380     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4260-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  57 in total

1.  Brain stem auditory evoked fields in response to clicks.

Authors:  B Lütkenhöner; C Lammertmann; B Ross; C Pantev
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The use of QSD (q-sequence deconvolution) to recover superposed, transient evoked-responses.

Authors:  Don L Jewett; Gideon Caplovitz; Bill Baird; Michael Trumpis; Marram P Olson; Linda J Larson-Prior
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Direct comparison between properties of adaptation of the auditory nerve and the ventral cochlear nucleus in response to repetitive clicks.

Authors:  K Meyer; E M Rouiller; G Loquet
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Generation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) explained using convolution.

Authors:  Jorge Bohórquez; Ozcan Ozdamar
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRs). I: Stimulus rate effects.

Authors:  G B Azzena; G Conti; R Santarelli; F Ottaviani; G Paludetti; M Maurizi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effect of natural sleep on auditory steady state responses in adult subjects with normal hearing.

Authors:  T Suzuki; K Kobayashi; Y Umegaki
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

7.  Recording of auditory brainstem response at high stimulation rates using randomized stimulation and averaging.

Authors:  Joaquin T Valderrama; Isaac Alvarez; Angel de la Torre; Jose Carlos Segura; Manuel Sainz; Jose Luis Vargas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Amplitude change with click rate in human brainstem auditory-evoked responses.

Authors:  Z D Jiang; Y Y Wu; L Zhang
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1991

10.  Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man.

Authors:  H Pratt; H Sohmer
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1976-05-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Improved Transient Response Estimations in Predicting 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Response Using Deconvolution Methods.

Authors:  Xiaodan Tan; Qiuyang Fu; Han Yuan; Lei Ding; Tao Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Simulation on the Comparison of Steady-State Responses Synthesized by Transient Templates Based on Superposition Hypothesis.

Authors:  Xiao-dan Tan; Xue-fei Yu; Lin Lin; Tao Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.238

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.