Literature DB >> 989724

Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man.

H Pratt, H Sohmer.   

Abstract

The complex of five waves, which are the responses to click stimuli of the auditory nerve and the brainstem auditory nuclei, were recorded in ten human subjects by means of earlobe and scalp electrodes. The rate of the stimuli was varied from 5/s to 80/s and their intensity was varied over a 70 dB intensity range in order to study the rate and intensity functions of each of the response components. With increasing click intensity, the amplitude of the first wave (generated by the auditory nerve) increased proportionally while the amplitudes of the later waves (generated by the brainstem auditory nuclei) reached their maximum amplitudes at intermediate click levels (saturation), and at high intensities occasionally even decreased in amplitude. The latency of each of the waves decreased by similar amounts as the intensity was increased. With increasing click rates, the amplitude of the first wave decreased the most, while there were smaller effects on the amplitude of the later waves. There was no effect of click rate on the latency of the first wave, but the latency of the later waves increased with click rate, the effect being greater on the later waves. In the rate functions, the latency change of a wave was greater than that of the waves preceding it (accumulative effect). These results are explained by overlapping convergence and divergence in the ascending auditory pathway. These results support the notion that the principal component of each wave is activated by the principal component of the previous wave. These results may explain the relative ease with which several workers record the fourth wave of the complex, and their preference for this response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 989724     DOI: 10.1007/bf00454268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  22 in total

1.  Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat.

Authors:  J S Buchwald; C Huang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Electrocochleography during noise-induced temporary threshold shifts.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1975 Mar-Apr

3.  Numerical estimates of the auditory central nervous system of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  K L CHOW
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1951-08       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  [Influence of the pressure rise steepness of clicks to early neural responses (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Stecker
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1974-06-18

5.  Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard; H I Krausz; R Galambos
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

6.  Properties of an early AER of 5 - 10 ms latency.

Authors:  G Gerull; M Giesen; D Mrowinski
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1974 Jul-Aug

7.  Standard values of amplitude and latency of cochlear audiometry (electro-cochleography). Responses in different age groups.

Authors:  A Lieberman; H Sohmer; G Szabo
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1973-02-28

8.  Routine use of electrocochleography (cochlear audiometry) on human subjects.

Authors:  H Sohmer; M Feinmesser
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1973 May-Jun

9.  Sources of electrocochleographic responses as studied in patients with brain damage.

Authors:  H Sohmer; M Feinmesser; G Szabo
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-12

10.  Recording auditory-nerve potentials as an office procedure.

Authors:  P B Montandon; N D Megill; A R Kahn; W T Peake; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  8 in total

1.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence from auditory nerve and brainstem evoked responses for an organic brain lesion in children with autistic traits.

Authors:  M Student; H Sohmer
Journal:  J Autism Child Schizophr       Date:  1978-03

3.  Disruption of the auditory response to a regular click train by a single, extra click.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory brain-stem potentials studied with paired stimuli in normals.

Authors:  C W Hess; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  The effect of the click repetition rate on the latency of the auditory evoked brain stem response and its clinical use for a neurological diagnosis.

Authors:  T Yagi; K Kaga
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

6.  Acute and long-term effects of adrenocorticotropin and dexamethasone on the auditory brainstem response in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  J Born; B Schwab; R Schwab; H Schreiber
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Sound level context modulates neural activity in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Sonia Yasmin; Kurdo Araz; David W Purcell; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Optimizing Stimulus Repetition Rate for Recording Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Elicited by Air-Conduction Tone Bursts of 500 Hz.

Authors:  Niraj Kumar Singh; Peter Kadisonga; Palliyath Ashitha
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-06-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.