Literature DB >> 21536464

A low tube voltage technique reduces the radiation dose at retrospective ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography for anatomical and functional analyses.

Seitaro Oda1, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Yoshinori Funama, Kazuo Awai, Kazuhiro Katahira, Takeshi Nakaura, Yumi Yanaga, Tomohiro Namimoto, Yasuyuki Yamashita.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of low-tube-voltage technique on a cardiac computed tomography (CT) for coronary arterial and cardiac functional analyses and radiation dose in slim patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 80 patients (52women, 28 men; mean age, 68.7 ± 8.9 years) undergoing retrospective electrocardiogram-gated 64-slice cardiac CT. Forty were subjected to the low (80-kV) and 40 to the standard (120-kV) tube-voltage protocol. Quantitative parameters of the coronary arteries (ie, CT attenuation, image noise, and the contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were calculated, as were the effective radiation dose and the figure of merit (FOM). Each coronary artery segment was visually evaluated using a 5-point scale. Cardiac function calculated by using low-tube-voltage cardiac CT was compared with that on echocardiographs.
RESULTS: CT attenuation and image noise were significantly higher at 80- than 120-kV (P < .01). CNR of the left and right coronary artery was 18.4 ± 3.8 and 18.5 ± 3.3, respectively, at 80 kV; these values were 19.7 ± 2.7 and 19.8 ± 2.8 at 120 kV; the difference was not significant. The estimated effective radiation dose was significantly lower at 80 than 120 kV (6.3 ± 0.6 vs. 13.9 ± 1.1 mSv, P < .01) and FOM was significantly higher at 80 than 120 kV (P < .01). At visual assessment, 99% of the coronary segments were diagnostic quality; the two protocols did not differ significantly. We observed a strong correlation and good agreement between low-tube-voltage cardiac CT and echocardiography for cardiac functional analyses.
CONCLUSION: Low-tube-voltage cardiac CT significantly reduced the radiation dose by approximately 55% in slim patients while maintaining anatomical image quality and accuracy of cardiac functional analysis. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536464     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  20 in total

1.  Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Wm Guy Weigold; Gaby Weissman; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiation dose of coronary CT angiography with a third-generation dual-source CT in a "real-world" patient population.

Authors:  Aleksander Kosmala; Bernhard Petritsch; Andreas Max Weng; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Tobias Gassenmaier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation using low tube voltage coronary CT angiography with isotonic low-concentration contrast agent.

Authors:  Yuning Pan; Qiuli Huang; Yingchao Zhu; Xinrong Zou; Huimin Chu; Xianfeng Du; Aijing Li; Shizhong Bu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Impact of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction on myocardial late iodine enhancement in computed tomography and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Yuki Tanabe; Teruhito Kido; Akira Kurata; Naoki Fukuyama; Takahiro Yokoi; Tomoyuki Kido; Teruyoshi Uetani; Mani Vembar; Amar Dhanantwari; Shinichi Tokuyasu; Natsumi Yamashita; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Low contrast- and low radiation dose protocol for cardiac CT of thin adults at 256-row CT: usefulness of low tube voltage scans and the hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Takeshi Nakaura; Masafumi Kidoh; Naritsugu Sakaino; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Tetsuya Kawahara; Kazunori Harada; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  256-Slice coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: optimal reconstruction phase and image quality.

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Keiichi Honda; Akira Yoshimura; Kazuhiro Katahira; Katsuo Noda; Shuichi Oshima; Hideaki Yuki; Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Takeshi Nakaura; Tomohiro Namimoto; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Low tube voltage prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography: a systematic review of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Sock Keow Tan; Chai Hong Yeong; Raja Rizal Azman Raja Aman; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Kok Han Chee; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Recent advances in cardiac computed tomography dose reduction strategies: a review of scientific evidence and technical developments.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Vinit Baliyan; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-24

9.  Automatic spectral imaging protocol and iterative reconstruction for radiation dose reduction in typical hepatic hemangioma computed tomography with reduced iodine load: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Wei Li; Aiyin Li; Bin Wang; Xiuyuan Niu; Xin Cao; Xinyi Wang; Hao Shi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Quantitative assessment of right ventricular function and pulmonary regurgitation in surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot using 256-slice CT: comparison with 3-Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Yuzo Yamasaki; Michinobu Nagao; Kenichiro Yamamura; Masato Yonezawa; Yoshio Matsuo; Satoshi Kawanami; Takeshi Kamitani; Ko Higuchi; Ichiro Sakamoto; Yuichi Shiokawa; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.