Literature DB >> 25808885

Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation.

Joseph R Bennett1, Richard Maloney2, Hugh P Possingham3.   

Abstract

To address the global extinction crisis, both efficient use of existing conservation funding and new sources of funding are vital. Private sponsorship of charismatic 'flagship' species conservation represents an important source of new funding, but has been criticized as being inefficient. However, the ancillary benefits of privately sponsored flagship species conservation via actions benefiting other species have not been quantified, nor have the benefits of incorporating such sponsorship into objective prioritization protocols. Here, we use a comprehensive dataset of conservation actions for the 700 most threatened species in New Zealand to examine the potential biodiversity gains from national private flagship species sponsorship programmes. We find that private funding for flagship species can clearly result in additional species and phylogenetic diversity conserved, via conservation actions shared with other species. When private flagship species funding is incorporated into a prioritization protocol to preferentially sponsor shared actions, expected gains can be more than doubled. However, these gains are consistently smaller than expected gains in a hypothetical scenario where private funding could be optimally allocated among all threatened species. We recommend integrating private sponsorship of flagship species into objective prioritization protocols to sponsor efficient actions that maximize biodiversity gains, or wherever possible, encouraging private donations for broader biodiversity goals.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  biodiversity conservation; flagship fleet; flagship species; prioritization protocol; private sponsorship; threatened species

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808885      PMCID: PMC4389608          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

1.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?

Authors:  S J Andelman; W F Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Margaret Branton; John S Richardson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.

Authors:  Liana N Joseph; Richard F Maloney; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.

Authors:  Daniel P Faith
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Is conservation triage just smart decision making?

Authors:  Madeleine C Bottrill; Liana N Joseph; Josie Carwardine; Michael Bode; Carly Cook; Edward T Game; Hedley Grantham; Salit Kark; Simon Linke; Eve McDonald-Madden; Robert L Pressey; Susan Walker; Kerrie A Wilson; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs.

Authors:  Donal P McCarthy; Paul F Donald; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Graeme M Buchanan; Andrew Balmford; Jonathan M H Green; Leon A Bennun; Neil D Burgess; Lincoln D C Fishpool; Stephen T Garnett; David L Leonard; Richard F Maloney; Paul Morling; H Martin Schaefer; Andy Symes; David A Wiedenfeld; Stuart H M Butchart
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.

Authors:  Nick J B Isaac; Samuel T Turvey; Ben Collen; Carly Waterman; Jonathan E M Baillie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Use of surrogate species to cost-effectively prioritize conservation actions.

Authors:  Michelle Ward; Jonathan R Rhodes; James E M Watson; James Lefevre; Scott Atkinson; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  Single species conservation as an umbrella for management of landscape threats.

Authors:  Claire A Runge; John C Withey; David E Naugle; Joseph E Fargione; Kate J Helmstedt; Ashley E Larsen; Sebastian Martinuzzi; Jason D Tack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Factors Influencing the Sponsoring of Animals in Slovak Zoos.

Authors:  Jana Fančovičová; Pavol Prokop; Róberta Repáková; William Medina-Jerez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lynda Donaldson; Robert J Wilson; Ilya M D Maclean
Journal:  Biodivers Conserv       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.549

5.  Conservation prioritization can resolve the flagship species conundrum.

Authors:  Jennifer McGowan; Linda J Beaumont; Robert J Smith; Alienor L M Chauvenet; Robert Harcourt; Scott C Atkinson; John C Mittermeier; Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez; John B Baumgartner; Andrew Beattie; Rachael Y Dudaniec; Richard Grenyer; David A Nipperess; Adam Stow; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.